Yeah, I've already read it. And yeah, the language is a bit biased, aside of the short explanations not covering too much as for me. So I should look somwehere else.
Horrible? Okay, then. Can you explain why? I mean, I know that Ren'Py is using MIT, and there are no problems with anything as far as I can tell. So, what's wrong with it?
I thought of using GPL, but it would mean someone else would be obliged to open their source code if they base their software on my engine. Though open-source is good and must exist (speaking of Ren'Py, which is not GPL, but still an open-source engine considered a golden standard of VN development), I'd like to give others the right to make their derivative works either open or closed, by their choice.
Okay! Thank you very much, I think.
Aah, okay then. Well, it does make sense indeed.
Okay, thank you for the explanation. Cases can be different here.
Huh, lol. No, I didn't know that. One of my friends uses FreeBSD, and he likes it. But yeah, that's a good point.
Do you mean that without GPL my access to my own project can vanish?
I'm glad you appreciate it! This made my day!
BSD 3-Clause.
I definitely will.
That's why I was considering a permissive license in the first place, yes.
That's a good explanation, thank you for teaching me.
Roflolmao
Aha, okay. The same Ren'Py does. Thank you, I'll think about it.
Yeah, I've already read it. And yeah, the language is a bit biased, aside of the short explanations not covering too much as for me. So I should look somwehere else.
Nevertheless, thank you for the explanation!
Okay, so it's a threat if I use a permissive license. Thank you very much! I'll think about it.
Okay, thanks for the advice. LGPL might be a good option, I'll look into it.
Okay, thank you very much. As for now, I hope my engine will be known enough for anyone to recognise the hoax.
Horrible? Okay, then. Can you explain why? I mean, I know that Ren'Py is using MIT, and there are no problems with anything as far as I can tell. So, what's wrong with it?
I thought of using GPL, but it would mean someone else would be obliged to open their source code if they base their software on my engine. Though open-source is good and must exist (speaking of Ren'Py, which is not GPL, but still an open-source engine considered a golden standard of VN development), I'd like to give others the right to make their derivative works either open or closed, by their choice.
As for AGPL, I know nothing, unfortunately.
What about the non-endorsement clause, then?
Well, the only difference is a so-called "non-endorsement clause". I wanted to know where can I use it, and if I even should.