Guess what, there was a time when even USSR thought of joining NATO, but the motive was same a modern day Russia. We all know NATO was made to counter USSR (current day Russia). This was purely a part of Russian strategy, if they let USSR join NATO back then the whole point of existence of NATO would become pointless and if they refused, Russia would get to show the world the proof that the alliance was against them, enabling them to make their own. Russia is the successor of USSR.
I am not justifying any side, I am just explaining each side. Peace can only be brought through understanding of both oneself and the other. It is best that the world knows about all the sides involved in a conflict.
You didn't get what I meant, lemme explain.
See the world map and you will notice, in the east, Japan and South Korea have presence of US military, In the West (around central west more accurately), Turkey is a part of the NATO alliance and so is Poland in the West of Ukraine which also borders it.
Now imagine how a country would feel being sorrounded by its worst enemy from all the sides, this would have had definitely become the case if Ukraine joined NATO if its biggest enemy, it is totally unacceptable and this is the exact reason of Russian aggression towards Ukraine. The thing is, Russia is deliberately not trying to end or win this war.
If Russia captures all of Ukraine, then Poland and Romania will become its immediate neighbours who are already a part of the NATO. The problem would still remain the same. If Russia stops the war then Ukraine will immediately join NATO which it is not able to do now as NATO does not makes countries already engaged in war a part of it. The goal is to keep NATO away from immediate Russian neigborhood.
The best thing Russia can do is prolong the war to the extent which Ukraine cannot afford it, establish a puppet goverenment and leave, Ukraine in such a case would work as a wall between Russia and NATO.
Do you really think Russia is failing, and even if it is, if USA launches a boots on the ground operation Iran, the resources would definitely shift from Ukraine to Iran where USA is directly engaged, and when this significant aid is stopped, Russia will definitely get an upper hand.
I mean man he may act dumb but that does not mean he necesarrily is one. The real point is, wheather the toddler is ready to pay the price of Invading Iran, which will be all of its competing major powers landing in a better position.
Nice video for knowing History of India and its global contributions. Thanks for contributing and please feel free to post your views in this community.
the real issue in India are not big corruptions but corruptions at grass root levels, we need a system which allows us to complaint against such things formally, and action must be assured.
The thing, no Indian assets during this conflict have been harmed. Chabahar port, which Israel always claimed they would strike first in any conflict with Iran, is still safe. Do you really think USA will allow Chinese oil to pass through Starit of Hormuz?
China's BRI project has seen significant damages.
Remember, Pm modi went to Israel hours before conflict, maybe he was told about it beforehand and was requested to remain neutral, he must've had asked for protection of Indian assets in order of that, it does not sound impossible.
About the two naval vessels of Iran, it did not happen in our territory then how does it matter to us?
I am not saying that there was no airframe loss, but the sheer numbers advocated are fake. wheater you accept it or not, Rafael is the best in its class for a 4.5 gen fighter. The main goal of OP Sindoor was to attack and destroy Pakistani terrorist camps and military outposts which was achieved, in a conflict you cannot expect no loss, but the thing that matters is that wheather you achieved your target or not. Multipl Pak airbases were targeted and many grounded fighter jets were destroyed as well by India, I have shown multiple proves about that on this community and they are actually verified IAF sources but the most of the clips shown by PAF are highly questionable. So the losses were on both the sides, but the difference was, India was able to achieve its targets.
We have learnt from our mistakes, intensity however may vary, but we are learning and improving. Nothing is completely good or bad, it isgrey, in today's time, if 5 things are bad, 5 things are good too. Initiatives are being taken.
Yes, OUR so called Abdul Kalam and Bhabha (The way you address them) got the environment and that is why they were able to bring that change, but was that environment always there? No, they fought fo it and they eventually got it. Goverenment too has limits and now it must listen, The goverenment gave priority to space, now it is booming, it is a living example of this fact that change is possible through systemic reforms rather than money intense forceful ones, and if we strive enough, the goverenment will be forced to obey.
The problem today is, no one is truly doing their duty. No citizen obeys rules, politicians crumble the rules they themselves made, that is the problem, the problem is detachment from duty, duty towards society and nation.
About Bihar elections and Sonam Wangchuk, I will only say after gatherng proper information because I have not yet studied those subjects. But yes, this nation can be repaired, and if you don't agree, take your passport and feel free to leave.
😅 😭
Guess what, there was a time when even USSR thought of joining NATO, but the motive was same a modern day Russia. We all know NATO was made to counter USSR (current day Russia). This was purely a part of Russian strategy, if they let USSR join NATO back then the whole point of existence of NATO would become pointless and if they refused, Russia would get to show the world the proof that the alliance was against them, enabling them to make their own. Russia is the successor of USSR.
I am not justifying any side, I am just explaining each side. Peace can only be brought through understanding of both oneself and the other. It is best that the world knows about all the sides involved in a conflict.
You didn't get what I meant, lemme explain. See the world map and you will notice, in the east, Japan and South Korea have presence of US military, In the West (around central west more accurately), Turkey is a part of the NATO alliance and so is Poland in the West of Ukraine which also borders it. Now imagine how a country would feel being sorrounded by its worst enemy from all the sides, this would have had definitely become the case if Ukraine joined NATO if its biggest enemy, it is totally unacceptable and this is the exact reason of Russian aggression towards Ukraine. The thing is, Russia is deliberately not trying to end or win this war. If Russia captures all of Ukraine, then Poland and Romania will become its immediate neighbours who are already a part of the NATO. The problem would still remain the same. If Russia stops the war then Ukraine will immediately join NATO which it is not able to do now as NATO does not makes countries already engaged in war a part of it. The goal is to keep NATO away from immediate Russian neigborhood.
The best thing Russia can do is prolong the war to the extent which Ukraine cannot afford it, establish a puppet goverenment and leave, Ukraine in such a case would work as a wall between Russia and NATO.
Do you really think Russia is failing, and even if it is, if USA launches a boots on the ground operation Iran, the resources would definitely shift from Ukraine to Iran where USA is directly engaged, and when this significant aid is stopped, Russia will definitely get an upper hand.
I mean man he may act dumb but that does not mean he necesarrily is one. The real point is, wheather the toddler is ready to pay the price of Invading Iran, which will be all of its competing major powers landing in a better position.
Thanks man. Really appreciate someone saw my efforts. Please keep Posting for supporting us. Adios my friend. Best of Luck
Let Iran cook man, cuz thats 🔥 🔥
Nice video for knowing History of India and its global contributions. Thanks for contributing and please feel free to post your views in this community.
Fcking Disturbing man.
the real issue in India are not big corruptions but corruptions at grass root levels, we need a system which allows us to complaint against such things formally, and action must be assured.
The thing, no Indian assets during this conflict have been harmed. Chabahar port, which Israel always claimed they would strike first in any conflict with Iran, is still safe. Do you really think USA will allow Chinese oil to pass through Starit of Hormuz? China's BRI project has seen significant damages. Remember, Pm modi went to Israel hours before conflict, maybe he was told about it beforehand and was requested to remain neutral, he must've had asked for protection of Indian assets in order of that, it does not sound impossible.
About the two naval vessels of Iran, it did not happen in our territory then how does it matter to us?
Shiit
I am not saying that there was no airframe loss, but the sheer numbers advocated are fake. wheater you accept it or not, Rafael is the best in its class for a 4.5 gen fighter. The main goal of OP Sindoor was to attack and destroy Pakistani terrorist camps and military outposts which was achieved, in a conflict you cannot expect no loss, but the thing that matters is that wheather you achieved your target or not. Multipl Pak airbases were targeted and many grounded fighter jets were destroyed as well by India, I have shown multiple proves about that on this community and they are actually verified IAF sources but the most of the clips shown by PAF are highly questionable. So the losses were on both the sides, but the difference was, India was able to achieve its targets.
Maybe because no rafael never fell. Pakistan has shown no viable proof for it. We may be buying it becuase they were effective?
Which font is best according to you?
yeah, I don't understand what both the goverenment and courts are doing. Nice job in highlighting this major event.
We have learnt from our mistakes, intensity however may vary, but we are learning and improving. Nothing is completely good or bad, it isgrey, in today's time, if 5 things are bad, 5 things are good too. Initiatives are being taken.
Yes, OUR so called Abdul Kalam and Bhabha (The way you address them) got the environment and that is why they were able to bring that change, but was that environment always there? No, they fought fo it and they eventually got it. Goverenment too has limits and now it must listen, The goverenment gave priority to space, now it is booming, it is a living example of this fact that change is possible through systemic reforms rather than money intense forceful ones, and if we strive enough, the goverenment will be forced to obey.
The problem today is, no one is truly doing their duty. No citizen obeys rules, politicians crumble the rules they themselves made, that is the problem, the problem is detachment from duty, duty towards society and nation.
About Bihar elections and Sonam Wangchuk, I will only say after gatherng proper information because I have not yet studied those subjects. But yes, this nation can be repaired, and if you don't agree, take your passport and feel free to leave.
Still, thnks for telling your views