Capricorn

u/Capricorn@lemmy.today
5 posts · 31 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

I know bespoke synth. It's very nice, but at least I need some controller. Moreover, I don't like programming for doing music. I'm looking for something faster. Also, I found it a little buggy, with random crashes here and there. I think that for those kind of stuffs it's better staying on reliable software like puredata and derivatives

These are the DuckDuckGo AI and Proton Lumo pages. No google stuffs around. Ok uBlock thinks it's tracking, but that's a questionable level.

BTW, it's terrific that mozilla uses tracking bits by external aggregator companies

Google tag manager and clarify.ms are not about AI. Also, not all (actually, only few) AI services track you in the traditional way of using cookies, urls, and so on.

The thing is that the qdbus command only works from inside the terminal, because it needs to know the correct konsole instance. Anyway, I moved to alacritty because the konsole support for ANSI codes is terrible...

Qdbus command: qdbus $KONSOLE_DBUS_SERVICE $KONSOLE_DBUS_SESSION runCommand "!!"

on thinking of trying linux, · c/linux · -1 pts · 2y

I never tried PopOS, but I would never suggest Ubuntu. Manjaro is easy, updated, there are many people using it, offers large number of software, works well with Nvidia and other propietary drivers (the thing that generates issues for new users, usually). I know people think they had "security" problems, but they always explained what happened, and they just had a bad contract with the CDN service and a misleading error message in pamac, that didn't impact the security of the user.

on thinking of trying linux, · c/linux · 3 pts · 2y

The thing is that people use Linux and than find it so good that they try to find problems in order to spend time playing with it. It's like a hobby, or a game... But you can also use it without making it a hobby. Ubuntu was born for this, but for that I would honestly suggest something like Manjaro

I guess there are many benefits if subprocesses (usually written in C) are replaced with functions (usually wrapping C code). That way, you could run an entire OS scripts via Python, with sensible performance improvements.

BUT

Does this tool replace shell commands with python functions? Or does it just call many times subprocesses.run()?