There's just...so much content out there about Hollow Knight if the answer to your question is of actual interest to you. No shade to you if it wasn't up your alley, but the only kind of response you can get is someone else's opinion. Like, I gave Bloodborne my best effort (30-40 hours of it) but eventually had to give it up, despite loving Demon's Souls and Elden Ring. But I love hearing about others' passion for it all the same and accept that there's a something there that didn't click for me.
Though creating a lemmy account is not that complex. Typically all you have to do is fill out a form on the websiten instructions included. The problem there is not the tech literacyn but the willingness of the people to even interact with systems they don’t know, like finding a home instance or understanding the concept of the fediverse. Most people could create a lemmy account, though also most people wouldn’t.
Spot on, it feels complicated because they don't understand what's being asked. I've said this before previously, but most people have no concept of frontends and backends. For most people, Twitter is just something that's on their phone, and it uses the internet to see what other people have in their Twitter apps on their phones.
Because internet usage and software generally is like 99.999% commercial, even the idea of closed and open source probably doesn't make sense to a lot of people. "Check out Mastodon, it's like Twitter but anyone can host it" would mean nothing to the average user. I'm on the absolute lower end of tech literacy in this community, so it's constantly apparent how much my Lemmy friends overestimate the general population.
Edit: To be clear, I say that non-critically. The tech industry has made it so astonishingly easy to interact with incredibly complicated systems, but they exploit the resulting ignorance for profit and market share because it severely limits our agency to choose something less antagonistic.
The couple times I've attempted a chargeback, my credit card company has sided with the business. The last time, we'd bought Switch controllers on sale from Walmart's website, but they were sold by a third party and the stick click button didn't work on them. We didn't notice for a couple months because we'd only used them for games that didn't use the stick click. We sent them to Nintendo for repair and they were returned unrepaired because they were counterfeit. We tried contacting Walmart 3 separate times after the seller failed to engage, after which point the return window was closed and the Walmart rep told me to dispute because their hands were tied.
So I did, and sent the product listing, my communication history with Walmart customer service, and the letter we received from Nintendo proving they were counterfeit. The credit card company reinstated the charge. I called them to ask why, and was told they asked Walmart to prove that the order had been fulfilled, and when they sent their evidence the chargeback was automatically canceled. I asked them to reopen it, and they did, and the supervisor told me that because the order was fulfilled and too much time had passed (probably around 6 months by then) there was nothing they could do.
Do not trust your credit card company to rectify malfeasance. The math is not on your side when they weigh the cost of pissing you off as an individual consumer versus the cost of pissing off a large business. They do not have your back.
I'm no less ignorant than you are, but "returning home" isn't as easy as it sounds when your leaders and neighbors were at best complicit and at worst eager conspirators (excepting those who rebelled either openly or secretly) in your extermination. Jews have a rather long history of being...mistreated, for lack of a more appropriate term within reach, so the abstract idea of having a self-governed homeland where you can feel safe as a Jew seems to make some degree of sense in context.
But because Zionism is generally practiced by nationalists and religious zealots, and because colonialism was (and evidently is) still considered a-ok by the global power brokers when all this started, the tone of the occupation became "we're taking your space because we deserve it and you don't" rather than "may we please share your space in mutual benefit for our safe refuge."
I think that's a neat idea, but we could instead, collectively, just do better at following other cars at a safe distance. I know it's impractical to expect all drivers on the road everywhere to change their behavior, but it's also persistently frustrating as someone who has for years frequently been stuck in traffic to see 95% of drivers insist on following less than a car-length behind. Following too closely to enable decision-making or accommodate other drivers is the cause of like 98% of both traffic accidents and congestion, according to my completely anecdotal and made up research.
I'll tell you something about heroin for me. I did very very poorly in school, until I started doing narcotics. Then I went to the top of my class because my mind was so restless and turbulent and I could not sit still. […] I'd probably today be diagnosed as ADHD, I was bouncing off the walls. I couldn't sit still, I just wanted to get in the woods. […] I started doing heroin, I went to the top of my class. Suddenly I could sit still, I could read, and I could concentrate, I could listen to what people were saying, things made sense to me. […] It worked for me. And if it still worked, I'd still be doing it. […] It killed my brother, and it destroys your relationships. It hollows out your whole life. You have a one-dimensional life. I was a bundle of appetites and it was a full time job to feed them, with drugs and sex and alcohol and extreme behavior.
Is he implying that an ADHD diagnosis would have been frivolous for him because...he self-medicated with heroin and it worked out dandy?? Hasn't he publicly criticized the rate of ADHD diagnoses and related medications?
It was the fifth time that Mr. Braun had been arrested since Mr. Trump commuted his 10-year sentence just before leaving office in 2021, which was among a raft of last-minute clemencies granted to those with ties to the president. Mr. Braun’s sentence was commuted after his family used a connection with Charles Kushner, the father of Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law who was a senior White House adviser, to get the matter before Mr. Trump.
That episode highlighted Mr. Trump’s ad hoc process for granting clemency, favoring defendants who have gained access to the White House, often with scant vetting of their criminal histories. At the end of his first term, Mr. Trump granted clemency to a number of allies and well-connected people, including his longtime strategist Stephen K. Bannon and Elliott Broidy, a top fund-raiser.
I think the argument is that even if you're not consciously noticing it, your brain picks it up and that's part of the unsettling feeling you get. Is that true? I don't know. I was unsettled as hell watching Hereditary, but there's a lot more unsettling content besides the quasi-noticeable woman in the corner of the ceiling.
I'm glad to see It Follows included in the essay though. Watching characters converse in the grass, in the sunlight, in a scenario that in almost all other horror movies would be a tension-relieving safe scene, until you notice another character, blurry and deep in the distance, walking robotically on a straight path toward the central characters, still gives me chills. It remains one of my favorite effects, and is a top-tier reason why I love horror movies even though I don't love feeling tense or scared.
Because email federation is inherent to everyone's understanding of how that service works. And perhaps more importantly, email "instances" are run by corporations. Laymen are not signing up on a "server" or "instance," they're signing up for Google, Apple, or Microsoft - the service they get aligns to a company that provides it. Nearly every single service that anyone has ever signed up for online has followed the same essential process: go to fixed url, create id and password, gain access.
It's easy to underestimate, especially in communities like this, how enigmatic the entire infrastructure of the internet is to the general population. Think of those videos where people are asked what "the cloud" is: they pause and ponder and then guess "satellites?" because they've never even wondered about it. I'm guessing that for many people, something like Twitter is just something that lives in their app store that they can choose to "enable" on their phone by installing it.
People know that software is "made up of code," but they don't understand what that means. The idea that an "application" is a collection of services run by code, that there are app servers and web servers, that there are backends and frontends, is completely unknown to (I'd guess) a significant majority of people. And if someone doesn't understand that, it's honestly near impossible to understand what anything in the fediverse is.
We need more, and more accessible, and friendlier, tech literacy in general. The complexity of our world is running away from us ("I have a foreboding [of a time...] when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues" - Carl Sagan) and we simply can't deeply understand many of the things that directly impact us. But because of its ubiquity, IT may be the best chance people have of getting better at understanding.
I fear Matthew Vaughn has just lost his grip on the humanity that so brilliantly balanced the silly stories he likes to tell. Stardust is one of my all-time favorite movies, and Kick-Ass, X-Men First Class, and Kingsman are some of the most entertaining blockbuster flicks available, where the action is satisfyingly contextualized through excellent character work.
But his last three movies just don't have the right equation. From what I remember, Argyle started out really strongly but seriously devolved after the halfway point. I think he's indulging too much in the overwrought spectacle that he first toed the line of at the end of the first Kingsman.
Lincoln was a great biopic. Hyperfocusing on one pivotal moment in the man's illustrious life, and using the complexity of those circumstances to explore his intelligence and charisma from all angles was so much more effective than the whole-life-in-fast-forward approach so many other biopics follow.
Plus Daniel Day Lewis in peak form. Just an indescribably good performance.
Disney's creative integrity is dogshit. The MCU is overstuffed and meandering. I planned to be skeptical.
But goddammit if this trailer didn't give me chills. Charlie Cox's interpretation of Daredevil is quite possibly the best adapted superhero performance I've ever seen. I'd have watched this series beginning to end just to see him playing the part, but the tension, the action, the emotion, the score all worked in this trailer.
Despite my better wisdom I am fucking excited.
Does anyone know what is required viewing going into this? I watched She-Hulk but I think Daredevil was also in Echo or something? Anything else?
Some teams put a little more effort into these than others lol (looking at you Polyphony). Housemarque's is delightfully twisted in context. ZA/UM's is really cool but spoiled by...that whole thing. My favorite just on pure aesthetics might be Sucker Punch.
Fair enough. I love the 80s vibe otherwise, but the brands have the awkward blocking and lingering-too-long-shot quality of bad product placement. Maybe in the final product it will make more sense if it's supposed to be thematic and not just paid sponsorship.
Really impressed with how distinct a direction they went for this, it looks really promising.
I'm not tapped into the conversation over the show last night but I assume I'm not the only one who thinks the advertisements in this 4-minute video were fucking horrendous though.
“We’ve never been the party that was about checking boxes or identity politics, but the difference is we have women that are qualified to be chairs, and I don’t know why there wasn’t one who was able to become a chairperson of a committee," she added.
They've created this cartoonish simulacrum of diversity that they treat like some rabid, overzealous movement so they can ignore it.
Nicole, this thing you're disappointed about is what that thing you dismiss as "identity politics" is actually all about, you weiner.
There's just...so much content out there about Hollow Knight if the answer to your question is of actual interest to you. No shade to you if it wasn't up your alley, but the only kind of response you can get is someone else's opinion. Like, I gave Bloodborne my best effort (30-40 hours of it) but eventually had to give it up, despite loving Demon's Souls and Elden Ring. But I love hearing about others' passion for it all the same and accept that there's a something there that didn't click for me.
FWIW, this is the video that convinced me to play Hollow Knight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm9Q4YLaWLk. It's a long one but it makes a good case.
Spot on, it feels complicated because they don't understand what's being asked. I've said this before previously, but most people have no concept of frontends and backends. For most people, Twitter is just something that's on their phone, and it uses the internet to see what other people have in their Twitter apps on their phones.
Because internet usage and software generally is like 99.999% commercial, even the idea of closed and open source probably doesn't make sense to a lot of people. "Check out Mastodon, it's like Twitter but anyone can host it" would mean nothing to the average user. I'm on the absolute lower end of tech literacy in this community, so it's constantly apparent how much my Lemmy friends overestimate the general population.
Edit: To be clear, I say that non-critically. The tech industry has made it so astonishingly easy to interact with incredibly complicated systems, but they exploit the resulting ignorance for profit and market share because it severely limits our agency to choose something less antagonistic.
"You're not giving any context for your incredulity" might be the most helpful phrase I can remember hearing for communicating on the internet.
The couple times I've attempted a chargeback, my credit card company has sided with the business. The last time, we'd bought Switch controllers on sale from Walmart's website, but they were sold by a third party and the stick click button didn't work on them. We didn't notice for a couple months because we'd only used them for games that didn't use the stick click. We sent them to Nintendo for repair and they were returned unrepaired because they were counterfeit. We tried contacting Walmart 3 separate times after the seller failed to engage, after which point the return window was closed and the Walmart rep told me to dispute because their hands were tied.
So I did, and sent the product listing, my communication history with Walmart customer service, and the letter we received from Nintendo proving they were counterfeit. The credit card company reinstated the charge. I called them to ask why, and was told they asked Walmart to prove that the order had been fulfilled, and when they sent their evidence the chargeback was automatically canceled. I asked them to reopen it, and they did, and the supervisor told me that because the order was fulfilled and too much time had passed (probably around 6 months by then) there was nothing they could do.
Do not trust your credit card company to rectify malfeasance. The math is not on your side when they weigh the cost of pissing you off as an individual consumer versus the cost of pissing off a large business. They do not have your back.
I'm no less ignorant than you are, but "returning home" isn't as easy as it sounds when your leaders and neighbors were at best complicit and at worst eager conspirators (excepting those who rebelled either openly or secretly) in your extermination. Jews have a rather long history of being...mistreated, for lack of a more appropriate term within reach, so the abstract idea of having a self-governed homeland where you can feel safe as a Jew seems to make some degree of sense in context.
But because Zionism is generally practiced by nationalists and religious zealots, and because colonialism was (and evidently is) still considered a-ok by the global power brokers when all this started, the tone of the occupation became "we're taking your space because we deserve it and you don't" rather than "may we please share your space in mutual benefit for our safe refuge."
I think that's a neat idea, but we could instead, collectively, just do better at following other cars at a safe distance. I know it's impractical to expect all drivers on the road everywhere to change their behavior, but it's also persistently frustrating as someone who has for years frequently been stuck in traffic to see 95% of drivers insist on following less than a car-length behind. Following too closely to enable decision-making or accommodate other drivers is the cause of like 98% of both traffic accidents and congestion, according to my completely anecdotal and made up research.
Exactly what I immediately thought of.
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/06a73aad-0ef6-4664-8247-25c19d84cae9
Is he implying that an ADHD diagnosis would have been frivolous for him because...he self-medicated with heroin and it worked out dandy?? Hasn't he publicly criticized the rate of ADHD diagnoses and related medications?
I think the argument is that even if you're not consciously noticing it, your brain picks it up and that's part of the unsettling feeling you get. Is that true? I don't know. I was unsettled as hell watching Hereditary, but there's a lot more unsettling content besides the quasi-noticeable woman in the corner of the ceiling.
I'm glad to see It Follows included in the essay though. Watching characters converse in the grass, in the sunlight, in a scenario that in almost all other horror movies would be a tension-relieving safe scene, until you notice another character, blurry and deep in the distance, walking robotically on a straight path toward the central characters, still gives me chills. It remains one of my favorite effects, and is a top-tier reason why I love horror movies even though I don't love feeling tense or scared.
Because email federation is inherent to everyone's understanding of how that service works. And perhaps more importantly, email "instances" are run by corporations. Laymen are not signing up on a "server" or "instance," they're signing up for Google, Apple, or Microsoft - the service they get aligns to a company that provides it. Nearly every single service that anyone has ever signed up for online has followed the same essential process: go to fixed url, create id and password, gain access.
It's easy to underestimate, especially in communities like this, how enigmatic the entire infrastructure of the internet is to the general population. Think of those videos where people are asked what "the cloud" is: they pause and ponder and then guess "satellites?" because they've never even wondered about it. I'm guessing that for many people, something like Twitter is just something that lives in their app store that they can choose to "enable" on their phone by installing it.
People know that software is "made up of code," but they don't understand what that means. The idea that an "application" is a collection of services run by code, that there are app servers and web servers, that there are backends and frontends, is completely unknown to (I'd guess) a significant majority of people. And if someone doesn't understand that, it's honestly near impossible to understand what anything in the fediverse is.
And most importantly: this is not any user's fault. IT and the Internet developed so quickly, and it was made so seamlessly accessible by corporations who at first just wanted their services to be adopted, and then wanted everything even more deliberately opaque so those users were more likely to feel locked in and dependent while the services themselves tail-spun in degradation.
We need more, and more accessible, and friendlier, tech literacy in general. The complexity of our world is running away from us ("I have a foreboding [of a time...] when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues" - Carl Sagan) and we simply can't deeply understand many of the things that directly impact us. But because of its ubiquity, IT may be the best chance people have of getting better at understanding.
I fear Matthew Vaughn has just lost his grip on the humanity that so brilliantly balanced the silly stories he likes to tell. Stardust is one of my all-time favorite movies, and Kick-Ass, X-Men First Class, and Kingsman are some of the most entertaining blockbuster flicks available, where the action is satisfyingly contextualized through excellent character work.
But his last three movies just don't have the right equation. From what I remember, Argyle started out really strongly but seriously devolved after the halfway point. I think he's indulging too much in the overwrought spectacle that he first toed the line of at the end of the first Kingsman.
Lincoln was a great biopic. Hyperfocusing on one pivotal moment in the man's illustrious life, and using the complexity of those circumstances to explore his intelligence and charisma from all angles was so much more effective than the whole-life-in-fast-forward approach so many other biopics follow.
Plus Daniel Day Lewis in peak form. Just an indescribably good performance.
Disney's creative integrity is dogshit. The MCU is overstuffed and meandering. I planned to be skeptical.
But goddammit if this trailer didn't give me chills. Charlie Cox's interpretation of Daredevil is quite possibly the best adapted superhero performance I've ever seen. I'd have watched this series beginning to end just to see him playing the part, but the tension, the action, the emotion, the score all worked in this trailer.
Despite my better wisdom I am fucking excited.
Does anyone know what is required viewing going into this? I watched She-Hulk but I think Daredevil was also in Echo or something? Anything else?
Some teams put a little more effort into these than others lol (looking at you Polyphony). Housemarque's is delightfully twisted in context. ZA/UM's is really cool but spoiled by...that whole thing. My favorite just on pure aesthetics might be Sucker Punch.
An early proposal for The Last of Us 2.
Fair enough. I love the 80s vibe otherwise, but the brands have the awkward blocking and lingering-too-long-shot quality of bad product placement. Maybe in the final product it will make more sense if it's supposed to be thematic and not just paid sponsorship.
Really impressed with how distinct a direction they went for this, it looks really promising.
I'm not tapped into the conversation over the show last night but I assume I'm not the only one who thinks the advertisements in this 4-minute video were fucking horrendous though.
They've created this cartoonish simulacrum of diversity that they treat like some rabid, overzealous movement so they can ignore it.
Nicole, this thing you're disappointed about is what that thing you dismiss as "identity politics" is actually all about, you weiner.
Best month I can remember in a long time.
Forspoken: never planned on paying for it but I'm excited to play it for free.
Sonic Frontiers: I actually already own this on Switch but we've been saving it to give as a Xmas present. Solid addition to the catalog though.
F.I.S.T.: Forged In Shadow Torch: never heard of it but I've been devouring metroidvanias this year, and apparently this scored well so I'm pumped.
A Space for the Unbound: looks great, love the art style.
PHOGS & Biped: two coop puzzle games that sound great to play with the family.