Cruel

u/Cruel@programming.dev
2 posts · 243 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

Not true at all. Have you not seen all the NES emulators that apply anti-aliasing or other modern graphics techniques to old NES games? Completely changes the dev's vision. You need to disable them.

Or you can just realize that modern devs are working with FSR/DLSS and tweaking it how they want. Just like they been doing with anti-aliasing. They can literally mask portions of the scene so DLSS 5 doesn't apply to it.

Now, many games they showcased likely didn't put much effort into tweaking their performance for DLSS 5 since it's new and they didn't get the chance, but newer games will use it. It's not like raytracing and pathtracing just enhance whatever GPU driver devs want it to. The devs can control it.

Do you guys turn your graphics settings to lowest to make sure not to interfere with "artistic vision"? Or do you just not understand the technology at all?

The dev can literally control the vectors for DLSS 5 and test it for themselves until it looks how they like. If you don't like modifying frames, you should disable all post-processing shaders and most modern anti-aliasing too.

on disgusting pigs! · c/microblogmemes · -1 pts · 144d

Okay. Let's just start with Ron Johnson.

I can't find any evidence or quotes of him talking about Trump having raped minors.

Any Trump supporter ever say they believe Trump had sex with minors? Or are you just assuming that every Republican believes Trump raped minors? Because that's what it seems like, and that defies reality.

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/lemmyshitpost · 30 pts · 149d

Good for women who don't want to give birth, but still half-raise kids. You get a break from the kids during joint custody with ex-wife.

on Go stroke your lobes bro · c/tenforward · 2 pts · 149d

Idgi. What word are you supposed to use when referencing females now? It's not "woman," unless you're wanting to talk about gender. Or are people back to equating the two?

Didn't people complain about the lack of redactions for victims, even though it has now been confirmed, by those who viewed the unredacted files, that many of those redacted victims were trafficking minors and were authors of some of the questionable emails?

Yet when they take them down temporarily to review redactions, people are mad about that too?

People have all the documents backed up already. If they fail to restore any of them, then we'll know. 🤷‍♂️