Open Ai wouldn't use something or someone without consent?
There's a plethora of lawsuits and evidence that they did that with pretty much every medium out there.
Nah you're good. People just like to feel smart/feel like they did a "gotcha" when they "prove" someone wrong who spoke in a absolute. When it was blatantly obvious it was implied to not be an absolute term
Unfortunately not just that, but also similar to some potatoes, it's capitalism killing it. golden Rice and their seeds are private and must be bought by a monopoly company only.
I rarely see that,. But what I see all the time is Linux lovers being toxic fanboys trying to shove their "passion" down everyone's throat. Also, 99% of them being wrong about what it can "offer".
Or keep all communities public and stop using walled garden communities full stop.
Along with keeping forum threads alive for easier documentation and searchability.
I'm sorry to hear about the fire, but I think you missed the point.
The reason for a loss matters and the emotions around the reason also change. Just having blank acceptance is dangerous and people/corporatations would love to take advantage of you if you just accept bullshit.
Wtf is this thinking.
Open Ai wouldn't use something or someone without consent? There's a plethora of lawsuits and evidence that they did that with pretty much every medium out there.
Nah you're good. People just like to feel smart/feel like they did a "gotcha" when they "prove" someone wrong who spoke in a absolute. When it was blatantly obvious it was implied to not be an absolute term
Unfortunately not just that, but also similar to some potatoes, it's capitalism killing it. golden Rice and their seeds are private and must be bought by a monopoly company only.
I dislike this sentiment. Just because something is FOSS or open source, doesn't mean it's not harvesting your data or doing something nefarious.
Not just users, users who post.
Old.reddit.com and if you have an account, go into settings and opt out of the redesign.
I'm sure you have a definition of your own. So I'll cast a wide web to see what sticks for you.
ASML, ADYEN, NXP, NOKIA, SAP, DASSAULT, BAT, Spotify, LOGI
And yes, I know these don't hold a candle to the Mag7 of America.....
Oh sorry. I forgot you made the goal posts so that only you can be right. Fucking hell.....
You do know Europe has it's own stock market with hundreds of fin and big techs?
I think this must be the new dumbest comment on Lemmy. congratulations on being it.
Wtf is your problem copy and pasting your comment everywhere? No one keeps asking for your opinion on each comment.
When?
Anyone have a non-paywalled link?
Teach me to how to code a compiler to spit out fully realistic and accurate videos via text prompts.
quick maths.
modern day media has a big impact on that, also you being part of that history.
I rarely see that,. But what I see all the time is Linux lovers being toxic fanboys trying to shove their "passion" down everyone's throat. Also, 99% of them being wrong about what it can "offer".
Its a pure superiority complex fanbase.
Or keep all communities public and stop using walled garden communities full stop. Along with keeping forum threads alive for easier documentation and searchability.
So your answer to "not owning" anything is to borrow the "thing" from someone/something else that owns it?
With your library example literally not being possible under the dystopic future OP projects.
I'm sorry to hear about the fire, but I think you missed the point.
The reason for a loss matters and the emotions around the reason also change. Just having blank acceptance is dangerous and people/corporatations would love to take advantage of you if you just accept bullshit.