Clickbait. Cashing in on people wanting to know what the "heartbreaking question" is. And since the article buries it and refuses to directly identify what the question is, this is the excerpt from the article I assume it's referencing:
"I got close to her and she's like, 'Mom, am I still pretty?'" she said. "I said, 'Of course. You're beautiful.'"
Since nobody here is giving any actual reasons and just putting up straw men, let me give you the real reasons.
Crowded and high cost of living.
And because politics, those two points extend into lots of homeless (crowded) and "liberal initiatives" (cost of living). But it's always rooted into crowded and high cost of living.
But what about large cities in the red states? Yes, the same is said of those. Crowded and high cost of living.
I particularly like the "in these unprecedented times" bit. Every company I've called in the past 5 years has had that line on their recording. When every time is unprecedented, no time is unprecedented.
It is possible for both sides to be wrong in this. It was wrong for the driver to fail to comply. It was wrong for the police officers to assault this man. Not everything is black and white (lol, except this is black and white race thing...)
This is ALSO why no service should ever require or get my driver's license information. Fuck that. Also, yet another Constance to those who can't afford a car or want to improve the environment by living car free.
Are they married to other people? Don't know those people by name. I know affair implies they are married to other people, but sometimes media can be too judgemental.
I don't want to algorithm thinking I care about this stuff and annoying me with it, but this is the third post I've seen today about this. Who is this person and what's the affair?
See for yourself here! Apparently the call sounds like "go-way", which I can KIND OF get from the audio clip on that page? Not sure I would have naturally made that connection, but sure.
Is this a bad thing? Definitely shouldn't be driving during these conditions due to low visibility, high risk of significant damage leading to crash, etc.
I can't speak to that aspect. But I firmly believe that if our military planned and carried out this strike, then we had very good evidence that their bunkers were at a depth these ordinance could reach.
I was suspicious of that as well, but I'm not knowledgeable enough on that subject to speak on it, so didn't include it. But I doubt any country can build that extensive of a nuclear factory in so few years.
First off, this article is from 2022, re-released to farm clicks from the current hype cycle.
Secondly, this is conjecture on top of conjecture. They discuss that we can't know the current damage from satellite, and Iran down plays the damage. Then they go on to say "concrete is strong and can be stronger".
Articles like this annoy me. It's all based on lots of unsubstantiated claims, and then one guy's theoretical research. We don't know the strength of the bombs. We don't know the strength of Iran's bunkers. We don't know how much damage was done. None of this has changed. I doubt we'll ever really know. But throw whatever political spin on it you want, and now you've got a click worthy news article.
On this topic, we also board the plane incredibly wrong. Always in the name of corporate profits.
Clickbait. Cashing in on people wanting to know what the "heartbreaking question" is. And since the article buries it and refuses to directly identify what the question is, this is the excerpt from the article I assume it's referencing:
Since nobody here is giving any actual reasons and just putting up straw men, let me give you the real reasons.
Crowded and high cost of living.
And because politics, those two points extend into lots of homeless (crowded) and "liberal initiatives" (cost of living). But it's always rooted into crowded and high cost of living.
But what about large cities in the red states? Yes, the same is said of those. Crowded and high cost of living.
I particularly like the "in these unprecedented times" bit. Every company I've called in the past 5 years has had that line on their recording. When every time is unprecedented, no time is unprecedented.
It is possible for both sides to be wrong in this. It was wrong for the driver to fail to comply. It was wrong for the police officers to assault this man. Not everything is black and white (lol, except this is black and white race thing...)
This is ALSO why no service should ever require or get my driver's license information. Fuck that. Also, yet another Constance to those who can't afford a car or want to improve the environment by living car free.
I don't get it at all. What does that make me?
TIL a new word. Propitiatory is to gain or regain favor.
Are they married to other people? Don't know those people by name. I know affair implies they are married to other people, but sometimes media can be too judgemental.
I don't want to algorithm thinking I care about this stuff and annoying me with it, but this is the third post I've seen today about this. Who is this person and what's the affair?
Given the inherent unreliability of LLM (called AI in the article), how can we go about exploiting this to purchase ridiculously discounted tickets?
Literally noticed it for the first time typing the aforementioned comment. It is indeed weird to me...
It is the Internet after all, but your comment seemed to be obviously satire to me. You did have me in the first half, not going to lie.
AMA is a toothless mouthpiece for the political side of medicine. And their the wrong side of politics.
Medical licenses are done at the state level by the state medical board. But yes, they should revoke the license.
See for yourself here! Apparently the call sounds like "go-way", which I can KIND OF get from the audio clip on that page? Not sure I would have naturally made that connection, but sure.
Is this a bad thing? Definitely shouldn't be driving during these conditions due to low visibility, high risk of significant damage leading to crash, etc.
I can't speak to that aspect. But I firmly believe that if our military planned and carried out this strike, then we had very good evidence that their bunkers were at a depth these ordinance could reach.
I was suspicious of that as well, but I'm not knowledgeable enough on that subject to speak on it, so didn't include it. But I doubt any country can build that extensive of a nuclear factory in so few years.
That's what they want you to think, but we have no evidence to either direction. And I doubt we will ever have a definitive answer.
Holy nothing burger, Batman!
First off, this article is from 2022, re-released to farm clicks from the current hype cycle.
Secondly, this is conjecture on top of conjecture. They discuss that we can't know the current damage from satellite, and Iran down plays the damage. Then they go on to say "concrete is strong and can be stronger".
Articles like this annoy me. It's all based on lots of unsubstantiated claims, and then one guy's theoretical research. We don't know the strength of the bombs. We don't know the strength of Iran's bunkers. We don't know how much damage was done. None of this has changed. I doubt we'll ever really know. But throw whatever political spin on it you want, and now you've got a click worthy news article.