I thought the fan theory was the route included a near pass by a black hole or something, and 12 parsecs would be the shortest "sane" route that didn't either
Require bravery/luck verging on stupidity
God tier course charting to get the orbital routing just right
So to do it in less than 12 would just be generally unheard of
That's a bit of a leading question, as if I advocated for single use Plastic specifically.
I'm not a food health scientist so I'd leave it at: as a consumer I want whatever keeps people safe, and is of the least impactful material. Commonly that's plastic, but as we see with glass bottles, options exist.
I'm not denying any of that but this community and others had much more friendly us eu relations just a year ago (edit compared to closer relationships with Russia...ever?) I'm just sad about that, not calling it uncalled for or something
Op why don't you suggest what an acceptable reply looks like? You're pretty restricted on what type of advice you're seeking.
Maybe then folks can ad libs in the thing that will help.
I'm all for packaging minimization but I also acknowledge that if I, the consumer seek single serving products, I'm pretty glad they are food safe and isolated. This is the part where "reduce" in the recycling slogan can manifest: what's the absolute minimum packaging needed to keep a consumer safe?
I'm not saying companies shouldn't ever be responsible for their packaging waste, it's a good idea. But I think municipal trash is meant to be that answer, in that rather than every company managing their own streams of returns, the locality does it, and sorts them by general type for efficiency/efficacy.
Therefore I think it best to factor waste costs from the company into that centralized system, so efficiencies of scale can manifest. This allows for better oversight and lower overall costs. The game is not allowing companies to be absent from this stage.
With acknowledgment that increased costs would land on the consumer one way or another, I'd conclude by saying centralized waste management needs to be better funded, and more sophisticated recycle/reuse systems implemented with those new funds.
And ultimately if you are trying to macgyver together anti drone tech you are beyond fucked and should have spent that energy pursuing other means of privacy.
American here. I'm legit sad that we aren't represented among our brothers, we lost the right due to our behavior
It feels like we called Grandma a bitch at Thanksgiving dinner and the cousins just threw us out
Edit for clarity: I'm not suggesting the US is part of the EU, instead highlighting that we are distantly APART from Europe now (because of our current behavior) and that sucks.
Final edit: this was either poorly worded or poorly received. This was an American speaking to a generally western, freedom loving shitposting group of planefuckers, where I was lamenting the state of American relations with Europe, and that a group of former allies feels the legitimate need to band together in a time of American fuckery.
I'm sorry some took this as butting in or assuming to be a member of the EU or something. It wasn't. It was an acknowledgement of a low in relations, and this American's sadness in that.
But that doesn't make sense, one beer a week is absolutely not triggering chemical addiction. At that rate you could attack any ritual behavior, or regular consumption of anything beyond nutrient paste and water
To me the important distinction is between chemical and behavioral addiction, habits and compulsions.
Ah never saw it
I thought the fan theory was the route included a near pass by a black hole or something, and 12 parsecs would be the shortest "sane" route that didn't either
So to do it in less than 12 would just be generally unheard of
Lereddit hoomor
I only use work hardware for work. I only use work networks for work. I have a cell phone off wifi for everything else
Not really the point of the post but sure, or directly relevant to my comment no contest with the options you laid out
Who brought up plastics?
That's a bit of a leading question, as if I advocated for single use Plastic specifically.
I'm not a food health scientist so I'd leave it at: as a consumer I want whatever keeps people safe, and is of the least impactful material. Commonly that's plastic, but as we see with glass bottles, options exist.
Synopsis complete
Dick like a tree
They sure did. Cashing chips every day now
I'm not denying any of that but this community and others had much more friendly us eu relations just a year ago (edit compared to closer relationships with Russia...ever?) I'm just sad about that, not calling it uncalled for or something
Op why don't you suggest what an acceptable reply looks like? You're pretty restricted on what type of advice you're seeking. Maybe then folks can ad libs in the thing that will help.
I'm all for packaging minimization but I also acknowledge that if I, the consumer seek single serving products, I'm pretty glad they are food safe and isolated. This is the part where "reduce" in the recycling slogan can manifest: what's the absolute minimum packaging needed to keep a consumer safe?
I'm not saying companies shouldn't ever be responsible for their packaging waste, it's a good idea. But I think municipal trash is meant to be that answer, in that rather than every company managing their own streams of returns, the locality does it, and sorts them by general type for efficiency/efficacy.
Therefore I think it best to factor waste costs from the company into that centralized system, so efficiencies of scale can manifest. This allows for better oversight and lower overall costs. The game is not allowing companies to be absent from this stage.
With acknowledgment that increased costs would land on the consumer one way or another, I'd conclude by saying centralized waste management needs to be better funded, and more sophisticated recycle/reuse systems implemented with those new funds.
And ultimately if you are trying to macgyver together anti drone tech you are beyond fucked and should have spent that energy pursuing other means of privacy.
Super wholesome lol
https://youtu.be/X6OowkRjVLc
Which is why I said I was sad, I'm acknowledging the moment that we deserve isolation when we should be brothers with the eu/Europe
Edited original for clarity
Edit you think I thought North America was part of Europe, or that the US was a member nation of the EU? Why would that possibly be my point?
American here. I'm legit sad that we aren't represented among our brothers, we lost the right due to our behavior
It feels like we called Grandma a bitch at Thanksgiving dinner and the cousins just threw us out
Edit for clarity: I'm not suggesting the US is part of the EU, instead highlighting that we are distantly APART from Europe now (because of our current behavior) and that sucks.
Final edit: this was either poorly worded or poorly received. This was an American speaking to a generally western, freedom loving shitposting group of planefuckers, where I was lamenting the state of American relations with Europe, and that a group of former allies feels the legitimate need to band together in a time of American fuckery.
I'm sorry some took this as butting in or assuming to be a member of the EU or something. It wasn't. It was an acknowledgement of a low in relations, and this American's sadness in that.
Canards are sexy.
He's just a dude, not a government judicial system
Athletic golden is great.
But that doesn't make sense, one beer a week is absolutely not triggering chemical addiction. At that rate you could attack any ritual behavior, or regular consumption of anything beyond nutrient paste and water
To me the important distinction is between chemical and behavioral addiction, habits and compulsions.