It's like trying to prove an author didn't use a ghostwriter. You might be able to find some clues, but the smaller the sample and the more cleanup the author did, the less chance there is to detect it.
Now what if they're using AI for debugging? Code from the AI may not even make it into the project, but that doesn't mean AI wasn't used. So how do you enforce a "no AI" policy in that scenario?
If there's no practical way to enforce a rule or tell if it has been broken, it's a pointless rule. Better programmers than me have settled on the policy of "If you track in shit on your shoes, you will be the one cleaning it up, and may well be told to not come back if you do." Make people responsible for the code they submit, and if they can't do it right, however they do it, don't merge their code and kick them out.
I expect better from an actual newspaper publisher. The proper word is 'reining', although the Freudian slip of saying we are bringing on the rule of AI is very on the nose.
Edit: looks like they fixed the typo in the headline, but hyperlinks are forever...ish.
Yeah, I can absolutely appreciate people of any background not being okay with Harris's stance on Israel, non-Israeli Middle Eastern people in particular. I just can't see turning to Trump and the GOP as any kind of improvement. That isn't rational behavior.
Ah, you saw AI and completely turned off your brain. I saw AI, saw information that could be relevant, went to the US government url, verified it was relevant, and linked it.
And there is no url in any of your comments in th9s entire thread.
But every person has a finite amount of time, and being required to learn a skill to function in society simply because society has decided to require it is a waste of the most valuable resource we have.
Do you think the government is inflating those numbers? Clearly you didn't try finding a source yourself. My actual search was "how many Americans make less than $580 per month", truly a difficult search to come up with, given the topic. This was the source the AI generated response used. But technically, you're correct - this is the number of Americans who live below the poverty line, which includes the kids of people making poverty wages. Does that make you feel better?
...at $20/hr. How many people do you think make that kind of wage and are only getting one shift per week? Do you think it's more than the nearly 1 million Americans who are making minimum wage?
FYI my very brief search says 50 million make less than the $580 per month you listed. I didn'tcheck how many of those are on Medicare. I guess the good news is only half of them don't qualify for medicaid.
I can appreciate useful skills, like how to make rope or make a meal or change a diaper, but being able to drive is only useful because we have made it necessary. I'd rather people have time to learn skills that have some inherent use than have to waste time learning how to drive.
It's like trying to prove an author didn't use a ghostwriter. You might be able to find some clues, but the smaller the sample and the more cleanup the author did, the less chance there is to detect it.
Now what if they're using AI for debugging? Code from the AI may not even make it into the project, but that doesn't mean AI wasn't used. So how do you enforce a "no AI" policy in that scenario?
If there's no practical way to enforce a rule or tell if it has been broken, it's a pointless rule. Better programmers than me have settled on the policy of "If you track in shit on your shoes, you will be the one cleaning it up, and may well be told to not come back if you do." Make people responsible for the code they submit, and if they can't do it right, however they do it, don't merge their code and kick them out.
You're getting a lot of down votes not for being wrong, but for being right.
I expect better from an actual newspaper publisher. The proper word is 'reining', although the Freudian slip of saying we are bringing on the rule of AI is very on the nose.
Edit: looks like they fixed the typo in the headline, but hyperlinks are forever...ish.
In truly misery fashion, I will watch this from a free streaming site. Ebenezer would approve.
Everything sweats (or boils) that close to the sun.
I have to believe she takes care of it all on the first of the month so she knows she'll have 4 full weeks of peace.
Get NileBlue on the case!
Yeah, I can absolutely appreciate people of any background not being okay with Harris's stance on Israel, non-Israeli Middle Eastern people in particular. I just can't see turning to Trump and the GOP as any kind of improvement. That isn't rational behavior.
I found them more fun than work after 8 or 10.
Bingo bango.
Ah, you saw AI and completely turned off your brain. I saw AI, saw information that could be relevant, went to the US government url, verified it was relevant, and linked it.
And there is no url in any of your comments in th9s entire thread.
There is 11"×17", it's called Ledger paper.
This doesn't make the american system okay.
But every person has a finite amount of time, and being required to learn a skill to function in society simply because society has decided to require it is a waste of the most valuable resource we have.
Do you think the government is inflating those numbers? Clearly you didn't try finding a source yourself. My actual search was "how many Americans make less than $580 per month", truly a difficult search to come up with, given the topic. This was the source the AI generated response used. But technically, you're correct - this is the number of Americans who live below the poverty line, which includes the kids of people making poverty wages. Does that make you feel better?
...at $20/hr. How many people do you think make that kind of wage and are only getting one shift per week? Do you think it's more than the nearly 1 million Americans who are making minimum wage?
FYI my very brief search says 50 million make less than the $580 per month you listed. I didn'tcheck how many of those are on Medicare. I guess the good news is only half of them don't qualify for medicaid.
OpenBSD is Canadian, but it also isn't Linux.
I can appreciate useful skills, like how to make rope or make a meal or change a diaper, but being able to drive is only useful because we have made it necessary. I'd rather people have time to learn skills that have some inherent use than have to waste time learning how to drive.
And in spite of all that, he was still a shitty person. He also happened to be good at marketing and functional design.
Aw shit, you got me. I'm not even married!
A thin atmosphere provides less lift, and I thought of the toxic atmosphere after I hit post.