Freedom and taking ownership (responsibility) for one's actions go hand in hand.
People irritated at having to make their own choices don't get to then be mad that choices are being made for them when they outsource that decision making process, imo.
I'm going to counter all the "this mechanic could be good or bad" with... Yeah? Isn't that the point of experimentation?
I'm personally happy with the risk of blunders if it means devs aren't just doing the same things as always. If it sucks, it sucks, but hopefully it brings something with discussing to the table in the process.
Jokes aside, what a weirdly leading question that doesn't actually lead anywhere— the only reason it is given a name is because the social dominance of theism necessitated the distinction.
There are also plenty of phrases regarding the rejection of something. Put "anti" at the front of plenty of philosophies or systems and boom, there you go.
One doesn't have to think that all humans are trash and deserve to die in order to think that it's not cool to bring a whole ass human into a shitty situation so that the labor pool stays stable.
Honestly at this point I consider those who peddle this narrative either bots or literally worse than those who are captured by the cult of MAGA — because they have "reasoned" that giving MAGA free reign makes them morally superior to those who voted for the Democrats. But I have to ask:
Do you basically just... Not believe in harm reduction?
Because the argument seems to hinge on the idea that you'd refuse to engage in behaviors that reduce TOTAL harm because there would still BE harm.
I agree that none of us are truly free until we all are, but I fail to see how outright christofascism AND genocide are the preferable outcome for you here. How exactly does sending people to El Salvadorian work camps and secreting away protesters improve our foothold on this issue, exactly?
If your idea is that, if gets bad enough, people will have enough anger to fuel your dreams of an uprising of some kind... At the end of the day you're STILL using human suffering as a bargaining chip while patting yourself on the back for being exactly the kind of non-resistance that MAGA relies on to gain power and momentum.
Tl;Dr: I really fucking hope you're an account made for astroturfing and not a real person because "dogshit take" is too soft a descriptor for this line of thinking.
"The worst thing about someone harming others and/or breaking laws is how often I have to hear about it."
"What do you mean I'm only able to say that because I'm not directly affected by it? I'M just trying to go about my day— calling my attitude short sighted is EXACTLY why these bad things are happening"
Does anyone know of a FOSS launcher that actually does the one thing from Nova I haven't been able to see anyone replicate: empty pages
No I don't want you to automatically delete my pages when I delete all the icons from a page— I have a KLWP I built with the page count in mind.
It seems like such an easy thing that I have such a hard time finding.
I just want an app drawer and two empty pages.
Freedom and taking ownership (responsibility) for one's actions go hand in hand.
People irritated at having to make their own choices don't get to then be mad that choices are being made for them when they outsource that decision making process, imo.
This just feels like an enlightened centrist take or worse, playing cover for bigotry.
Cile is less strawmanning and more exemplifying the absurdity of applying this mentality to literal Nazis and white supremacists.
Can you give an example of your assertion, historical or imagined, where we SHOULDN'T act against acts of intolerance due to some muddying factor?
I'm going to counter all the "this mechanic could be good or bad" with... Yeah? Isn't that the point of experimentation?
I'm personally happy with the risk of blunders if it means devs aren't just doing the same things as always. If it sucks, it sucks, but hopefully it brings something with discussing to the table in the process.
Republican = not believing in science and/or data
Jokes aside, what a weirdly leading question that doesn't actually lead anywhere— the only reason it is given a name is because the social dominance of theism necessitated the distinction.
There are also plenty of phrases regarding the rejection of something. Put "anti" at the front of plenty of philosophies or systems and boom, there you go.
I need a version of this with Zuma
You'd rather pay money AND watch ads than sign into a private tracker once a month?
Yup, fuck organized religion
One doesn't have to think that all humans are trash and deserve to die in order to think that it's not cool to bring a whole ass human into a shitty situation so that the labor pool stays stable.
Jesus Christ
Honestly at this point I consider those who peddle this narrative either bots or literally worse than those who are captured by the cult of MAGA — because they have "reasoned" that giving MAGA free reign makes them morally superior to those who voted for the Democrats. But I have to ask:
Do you basically just... Not believe in harm reduction?
Because the argument seems to hinge on the idea that you'd refuse to engage in behaviors that reduce TOTAL harm because there would still BE harm.
I agree that none of us are truly free until we all are, but I fail to see how outright christofascism AND genocide are the preferable outcome for you here. How exactly does sending people to El Salvadorian work camps and secreting away protesters improve our foothold on this issue, exactly?
If your idea is that, if gets bad enough, people will have enough anger to fuel your dreams of an uprising of some kind... At the end of the day you're STILL using human suffering as a bargaining chip while patting yourself on the back for being exactly the kind of non-resistance that MAGA relies on to gain power and momentum.
Tl;Dr: I really fucking hope you're an account made for astroturfing and not a real person because "dogshit take" is too soft a descriptor for this line of thinking.
Energy bending
"The worst thing about someone harming others and/or breaking laws is how often I have to hear about it."
"What do you mean I'm only able to say that because I'm not directly affected by it? I'M just trying to go about my day— calling my attitude short sighted is EXACTLY why these bad things are happening"
Holy fuck lol
Sure but as far as the topic at hand goes, I have a hard time imagining a single-nation-centric solution to global climate change.