This looks like something that might upset me very much if I knew what the fuck was going on. Fortunately, I'm 100% clueless, so I can happily go about my day.
The issue with using AI is that the author doesn't openly disclose the use at the beginning of the paper.
Yes, I know this particular write-up isn't for official submission to an academic journal, but sharing methodology is important.
I would have no problem with AI-assisted writing IF the author credited the service used and, where applicable, included the prompts used.
It should be similar to documenting any sourced material. It's not just about giving credit where credit is due. It's also about accountability.
What a dumb comment.
Why is this necessary? Does this add anything at all to the conversation?
I’ve run a honeypot for the last month and the data is near-identical to this. It’s definitely credible.
Ah, well then. Problem solved. Someone on the internet said it's credible, therefore it must be credible. Tell ya what - when you create a webpage to display your data and then provide an analysis of said data, I'll consider you credible. Until then, though, you are just some short-tempered, rude, anonymous voice shouting into the void.
Audience is an important piece to this discussion.
If the assumption is that therapy is an option, then the audience for @ScoffingLizard's comment is very narrow - literate, health-conscious, a person of some means. It's good advice within that narrow audience.
For the rest of the world, though, it's abysmal advice. "Codependency" isn't really an accurate description of relationship dynamics in oppressive societies like Saudi Arabia or the harsh realities in the slums of Bangladesh.
Why would the U.S. embassy in Bangkok be issuing this statement? Does this only apply to Thai citizens? And is this actually a change to U.S. policy? Hasn't ICE already been checking spot-checking social media accounts on mobile phones when people enter the country?
was the hit of recreational drug that important to take the risk
He didn't get executed for taking a "hit".
He got executed for trafficking a kilo.
Which is still pretty stupid, because 500 grams is the cutoff for the death penalty. He would have been better off to bring in 499 grams. But I assume he was going to make a pretty good profit, and that money was his main motivation.
Yeah, I think people are making some pretty naive assumptions about all the new datacenters popping up for AI.
What the fuck do you think the government is asking AI to do for them? Shitty cartoon artwork? Photoshopping vacation photos? Or, maaaaaaybe...I dunno....something like data collection and analysis on every byte of information sent across the tubes of the interwebs?
I'd love to see this - but not for this situation. Totally pointless. Counter-productive.
Cops got her on disorderly conduct, after the fact. Jt's a bullshit charge. They had nothing to charge her with otherwise.
But she's got a civil rights violation lawsuit in the bag. She's clearly heard repeating "Am I being detained?" The officer didn't answer and then used physical force to bring her down.
And even outside the law, the court of public opinion matters. Starting a riot by beating the shit out of a cop might not look so good. It's 20 on 1, and he could get disoriented and fire into the crowd.
But, for the record, if you are EVER dressed as a life-sized penis and a cop asks "What am I supposed to tell my kids?", you should answer "Tell them Trump is a dick."
Because that's an honest answer and there's nothing inherently sexual about this situation. Half the world has penises, there's naked statues and painting and pics of penises in every culture around the world. Kids can handle it.
You're not wrong, but this isn't a prudism problem. It's more like a "if it offends YOU, you're a snowflake, but if it offends ME, then you're under arrest" problem.
She turned her back on a cop and walked away. No better way to get arrested than to remind them how small they really are.
"Aliens" is really the only correct answer here. The rest lack vision.
Kitchenappliances.Washer/dryer come to mind as well.
Not to nitpick, but can you give an example?
I can't think of any which don't already have a better non-"smart" alternative.
This looks like something that might upset me very much if I knew what the fuck was going on. Fortunately, I'm 100% clueless, so I can happily go about my day.
The issue with using AI is that the author doesn't openly disclose the use at the beginning of the paper.
Yes, I know this particular write-up isn't for official submission to an academic journal, but sharing methodology is important.
I would have no problem with AI-assisted writing IF the author credited the service used and, where applicable, included the prompts used.
It should be similar to documenting any sourced material. It's not just about giving credit where credit is due. It's also about accountability.
Why is this necessary? Does this add anything at all to the conversation?
Ah, well then. Problem solved. Someone on the internet said it's credible, therefore it must be credible. Tell ya what - when you create a webpage to display your data and then provide an analysis of said data, I'll consider you credible. Until then, though, you are just some short-tempered, rude, anonymous voice shouting into the void.
Custom t-shirts for all the crew!
Get on Amazon (or Etsy, etc) and order shirts with clever Flock-related quotes.
"My employer gives a Flock about me!"
"This Flocking job....sometimes, man, sometimes."
"I wanted a raise but I got Flocked instead."
Pass 'em out for free, ask folx to wear them on Fridays.
Audience is an important piece to this discussion.
If the assumption is that therapy is an option, then the audience for @ScoffingLizard's comment is very narrow - literate, health-conscious, a person of some means. It's good advice within that narrow audience.
For the rest of the world, though, it's abysmal advice. "Codependency" isn't really an accurate description of relationship dynamics in oppressive societies like Saudi Arabia or the harsh realities in the slums of Bangladesh.
No, there is nothing artistic or educated about my taste in film. I survive on the worst kind of commercial drivel.
So many unanswered questions.
Why would the U.S. embassy in Bangkok be issuing this statement? Does this only apply to Thai citizens? And is this actually a change to U.S. policy? Hasn't ICE already been checking spot-checking social media accounts on mobile phones when people enter the country?
Anyway, fuck this trend.
He didn't get executed for taking a "hit".
He got executed for trafficking a kilo.
Which is still pretty stupid, because 500 grams is the cutoff for the death penalty. He would have been better off to bring in 499 grams. But I assume he was going to make a pretty good profit, and that money was his main motivation.
"Asia" is a HUGE place, with all kinds of different people, countries and cultures.
60% of the world's population lives in Asia.
I am currently smoking a joint in Asia. I bought it legally, in the shop down the street.
So....yeah....no death penalty for me.
7 Mary 3.
They had a hit that sounded dark and grungy. "Cumbersome". The rest of the album was much less angsty/original/grungy. Disappointing.
Nice to see a little hairband love in here.
For those curious, Extreme was featured in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure. Great hair metal band with exquisite technical lead guitar skills.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7Nwih9dCQs
Dammit! I only have 29 chickens, will this method still work?
The word is appreciated, but a link would be better...
Yeah, I think people are making some pretty naive assumptions about all the new datacenters popping up for AI.
What the fuck do you think the government is asking AI to do for them? Shitty cartoon artwork? Photoshopping vacation photos? Or, maaaaaaybe...I dunno....something like data collection and analysis on every byte of information sent across the tubes of the interwebs?
I'd love to see this - but not for this situation. Totally pointless. Counter-productive.
Cops got her on disorderly conduct, after the fact. Jt's a bullshit charge. They had nothing to charge her with otherwise.
But she's got a civil rights violation lawsuit in the bag. She's clearly heard repeating "Am I being detained?" The officer didn't answer and then used physical force to bring her down.
And even outside the law, the court of public opinion matters. Starting a riot by beating the shit out of a cop might not look so good. It's 20 on 1, and he could get disoriented and fire into the crowd.
But, for the record, if you are EVER dressed as a life-sized penis and a cop asks "What am I supposed to tell my kids?", you should answer "Tell them Trump is a dick."
Because that's an honest answer and there's nothing inherently sexual about this situation. Half the world has penises, there's naked statues and painting and pics of penises in every culture around the world. Kids can handle it.
You're not wrong, but this isn't a prudism problem. It's more like a "if it offends YOU, you're a snowflake, but if it offends ME, then you're under arrest" problem.
She turned her back on a cop and walked away. No better way to get arrested than to remind them how small they really are.
I think you would need to first make the case that software is making the world a better place. So far, it's got a spotty record....