3D printed stuff is not geat for hygienic reasons because the little groves accumulate dirt over time and is hard to clean. Did you coat the print somehow?
Reading those comments drops your IQ by 5 points. Now calculate the economic impact that will have... You can't because reading this comment drops your IQ by another 5 points :(
No, but I think he means that people hold back opposing ideas because of fear of hurting others. Then there are other group dynamics involved which suppress people expressing them selfies.
I would have thought this wold be less of a problem in online meetings
Can you provide a link to that video? And also a link to a good example how they present the data and the different confounding factors? Do they pubish the data somewhere other than in the videos? Thanks 👍
Lets say you run a single test and collect 10 samples at steady-state for temperature and power. This data will have some degree of variability depending on many factors such as airflow at that exact moment, CPU utilization and also inherent noise in the measurement device itself. Additionally, if you repeat the same test multiple times on different days with different testers, you will not get the exact same results.
So if you then compare a system A to system B you might see that system B is 12% "better" (depending on your metric), then you must answer the question--> is this observed difference due to system B actually being better or can this difference be explained by the normal variability in your test setup. Most of the time there are so many external factors influencing your measurement that even if you see a difference in your data, this difference is not significant but due to chance. You should always present your data in a way that its clear to the reader how much variability was in your test setup.
All valid points. But regarding the measurements, neither LTT or GN testing methodology are realy scientific. Those are youtubers with limited understanding of experimental design and analysis. I have never seen them do simple significance tests or try to explain the variability in the data. But I havent watched all the videos so 乁( •_• )ㄏ
Is this not similar to the introduction of calculators in schools? We don't need to use our brains anymore to do the "mechanical calculation". Instead we can offload this task to the machine and use our brain for other tasks.
You have a plethora of entertaining videos on youtube... but you like to watch ads? You are quiet peculiar my friend :-)
3D printed stuff is not geat for hygienic reasons because the little groves accumulate dirt over time and is hard to clean. Did you coat the print somehow?
Not just Reddit bots... "There is a discussion on [Reddit, Hacker News, etc...] but feel free to comment here as well." (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
The amount of details in this painting is astonishing 🧐😍
Impressive!😲
Hmm... sad to hear😞
Is there a paper about it? I have read about similar approaches: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.20030.pdf
Reading those comments drops your IQ by 5 points. Now calculate the economic impact that will have... You can't because reading this comment drops your IQ by another 5 points :(
It's not over until it's over. And it's not over yet.
What an insightful comment.
No, but I think he means that people hold back opposing ideas because of fear of hurting others. Then there are other group dynamics involved which suppress people expressing them selfies. I would have thought this wold be less of a problem in online meetings
Zoom has had a whiteboard since multiple years... But yeah, issuing tablets would make that feature more productive.
Can you provide a link to that video? And also a link to a good example how they present the data and the different confounding factors? Do they pubish the data somewhere other than in the videos? Thanks 👍
Lets say you run a single test and collect 10 samples at steady-state for temperature and power. This data will have some degree of variability depending on many factors such as airflow at that exact moment, CPU utilization and also inherent noise in the measurement device itself. Additionally, if you repeat the same test multiple times on different days with different testers, you will not get the exact same results.
So if you then compare a system A to system B you might see that system B is 12% "better" (depending on your metric), then you must answer the question--> is this observed difference due to system B actually being better or can this difference be explained by the normal variability in your test setup. Most of the time there are so many external factors influencing your measurement that even if you see a difference in your data, this difference is not significant but due to chance. You should always present your data in a way that its clear to the reader how much variability was in your test setup.
All valid points. But regarding the measurements, neither LTT or GN testing methodology are realy scientific. Those are youtubers with limited understanding of experimental design and analysis. I have never seen them do simple significance tests or try to explain the variability in the data. But I havent watched all the videos so 乁( •_• )ㄏ
My feeling exactly. Smaller communities nurture much more healthier engagement than bigger ones
I feel like it will get even more interesting ... (ꏿ﹏ꏿ;)
What about other tech companies like Microsoft or Google? Do they comply?
Is this not similar to the introduction of calculators in schools? We don't need to use our brains anymore to do the "mechanical calculation". Instead we can offload this task to the machine and use our brain for other tasks.