Fun part, even thirty-years ago there were pastors (no idea how many) that didn't write their own sermons. Even thirty-years ago there were services that provided series of sermons and sermons for pastors to use, and teacher their congregations. I heard that from a family member that was close to several pastors; they were a true-believer, after all. Kind of explained why there wasn't a whole lot of diversity in what was being taught or which books were being read from for sermons.
I hate this sentiment so much, because it implies that everyone can just wait for change:
Also: "Don't let perfect be the enemy of good [enough]."
Societal Progress is an exercise in iterative steps. Electric cars today, something even better tomorrow (and by tomorrow I mean in fifty to a hundred years because lord knows people refuse to fund mass transit in some countries).
Look at it from the other direction: Why do most large software vendors now require "The Cloud" for licensing instead of it being on the Device?
So, if the Local can inevitably be tampered with or bypassed (just like other parental controls which they apparently think aren't sufficient) what really is the point? Children's safety isn't improving. Who's benefiting?
Not that "The Cloud" is safer or in any way better. Just trading liability, culpability, and making enforcement more difficult to bypass. "Oops, lost your data, we're really [not] sorry. Here's $2, get yourself something nice. No, no, you still have to give us your data and pray it doesn't happen again. We promise it won't. Maybe."
One you have a chance in hell at changing their mind on that topic, and the other will tell you to fuck off or perhaps strap you to one of those bombs. But, sure, protest vote away, I guess. "Both sides" and all that.
I trust you've volunteered for it to replace you then. It being so beneficial to society, and all.
It means less people do more work.
And then those people no longer working... do what, exactly? Fewer well-paying jobs, same number of people, increasing costs. Math not working out here.
The fact that people are being replaced means that AI actually has tremendous value for our society.
Oh, it has value. Just not for society (it could that's the sad part). For very specific people though, yeah, value. Just got to step on all the little people along the way, like we've always done, eh?
Yeah, rather than volunteering its more likely you lack a basic characteristic of humanity some of like to refer to as "empathy" instead. And if -- giving you the benefit of the doubt -- you're just a troll... well, my statement stands.
why we need a moderate candidate just like hillary and kamala.
Screw the "don't rock the boat" candidates... unless they're the only option compared to the "let's destroy America!" candidate on the other side.
Not rocking the boat is better than setting the country on fire for no goddamn reason (if the system were burning down with a reasonable expectation we could make it better that'd be arguably different). I'm sure there are plenty that feel smugly superior for having "protested" by not voting, and I trust you don't mind the whole "country's on fire" thing going on (insert "this is fine" meme).
Right. They should resign. So 100% of the organization can support Israel in peace. That'll fix everything. Good plan.
Better Plan: vote in representatives that represent you, and stop listening to those that make you feel warm and fuzzy. But, this is a harder plan. Requires the majority of voters to, you know, try.
And then Democratic voters will get complacent, or get all pissy about how their pet project for change isn't getting enough attention fast enough, and not vote the next time leading to a Republican getting back in office BECAUSE SURELY THAT WILL HELP THEIR FUCKING PRECIOUS INTERESTS. It worked out so~ well this past Fall, didn't it? Nothing at all~ to be concerned about, worried about, uncertain about, or terrified about now.
If Democrats elect competent leaders
Pelosi and Schumer, and all their fanbois (people listening to them even when they aren't in office), would need to go.
Merrick Garland. That AG's name is Merrick Garland. It should not be forgot. Merrick Garland. He sat on his ass just like Mitch McConnell thinking things would magically work themselves out without needing to do their jobs and lo and behold things did not magically work themselves out.
Dude, 9/11 was "never forget" -- it was forgotten by the 15th year. The lessons of World War II? Not a lot of faith left in the ol' education system these days. (I know that's America centric, but I bet this trend isn't unusual for most places)
"R-Word" is a ridiculous over correction. It demeans the reason why "N-Word" exists. We collectively said the N-Word is out of bounds because it's the very least anyone can do given historical events that continue to resonate to this very day (god dammit). Now the Internet thinks "R-Word" is a good idea. Why? The word is "Retard." It's okay to say retard. What's not okay is demeaning people by calling them any derogatory term, and blacklisting words thinking that will somehow correct the problem is the height of hubris -- as if there are no other suitable replacements. It's an attempt to take a shortcut to a societal problem. It is, in a word, retarded (you can look up the definition in a dictionary and see it's an appropriate usage).
Guys (and Gals), hold on now. Sure, it's a recall for all Cybertrucks, but don't overreact! I'm sure an over-the-air software patch is incoming to fix this issue!
Fun part, even thirty-years ago there were pastors (no idea how many) that didn't write their own sermons. Even thirty-years ago there were services that provided series of sermons and sermons for pastors to use, and teacher their congregations. I heard that from a family member that was close to several pastors; they were a true-believer, after all. Kind of explained why there wasn't a whole lot of diversity in what was being taught or which books were being read from for sermons.
Imagine, if you will, what it's like today.
Not always. Sometimes it's the firewall.
Also: "Don't let perfect be the enemy of good [enough]."
Societal Progress is an exercise in iterative steps. Electric cars today, something even better tomorrow (and by tomorrow I mean in fifty to a hundred years because lord knows people refuse to fund mass transit in some countries).
vi because it's everywhere, even on servers where packages can't be downloaded or shouldn't be installed.
Look at it from the other direction: Why do most large software vendors now require "The Cloud" for licensing instead of it being on the Device?
So, if the Local can inevitably be tampered with or bypassed (just like other parental controls which they apparently think aren't sufficient) what really is the point? Children's safety isn't improving. Who's benefiting?
Not that "The Cloud" is safer or in any way better. Just trading liability, culpability, and making enforcement more difficult to bypass. "Oops, lost your data, we're really [not] sorry. Here's $2, get yourself something nice. No, no, you still have to give us your data and pray it doesn't happen again. We promise it won't. Maybe."
"MARK OF THE BEAST! GET YOUR MARK OF THE BEAST! 19.99! CALL NOW AND GET 66.7% OFF!"
"Please come inside." - Target CEO, reminiscent of "Please clap" Jeb Bush.
One you have a chance in hell at changing their mind on that topic, and the other will tell you to fuck off or perhaps strap you to one of those bombs. But, sure, protest vote away, I guess. "Both sides" and all that.
There's a tariff for that.
I trust you've volunteered for it to replace you then. It being so beneficial to society, and all.
And then those people no longer working... do what, exactly? Fewer well-paying jobs, same number of people, increasing costs. Math not working out here.
Oh, it has value. Just not for society (it could that's the sad part). For very specific people though, yeah, value. Just got to step on all the little people along the way, like we've always done, eh?
Yeah, rather than volunteering its more likely you lack a basic characteristic of humanity some of like to refer to as "empathy" instead. And if -- giving you the benefit of the doubt -- you're just a troll... well, my statement stands.
Screw the "don't rock the boat" candidates... unless they're the only option compared to the "let's destroy America!" candidate on the other side.
Not rocking the boat is better than setting the country on fire for no goddamn reason (if the system were burning down with a reasonable expectation we could make it better that'd be arguably different). I'm sure there are plenty that feel smugly superior for having "protested" by not voting, and I trust you don't mind the whole "country's on fire" thing going on (insert "this is fine" meme).
Right. They should resign. So 100% of the organization can support Israel in peace. That'll fix everything. Good plan.
Better Plan: vote in representatives that represent you, and stop listening to those that make you feel warm and fuzzy. But, this is a harder plan. Requires the majority of voters to, you know, try.
"We didn't start the fire. It's always been burning since the world's been turning..."
God: "No, yeah, that was me. I started it. Flicked over the first domino. Still watching the picture unfold. Quite the sight, wish you could see it."
And then Democratic voters will get complacent, or get all pissy about how their pet project for change isn't getting enough attention fast enough, and not vote the next time leading to a Republican getting back in office BECAUSE SURELY THAT WILL HELP THEIR FUCKING PRECIOUS INTERESTS. It worked out so~ well this past Fall, didn't it? Nothing at all~ to be concerned about, worried about, uncertain about, or terrified about now.
Pelosi and Schumer, and all their fanbois (people listening to them even when they aren't in office), would need to go.
Merrick Garland. That AG's name is Merrick Garland. It should not be forgot. Merrick Garland. He sat on his ass just like Mitch McConnell thinking things would magically work themselves out without needing to do their jobs and lo and behold things did not magically work themselves out.
Dude, 9/11 was "never forget" -- it was forgotten by the 15th year. The lessons of World War II? Not a lot of faith left in the ol' education system these days. (I know that's America centric, but I bet this trend isn't unusual for most places)
"R-Word" is a ridiculous over correction. It demeans the reason why "N-Word" exists. We collectively said the N-Word is out of bounds because it's the very least anyone can do given historical events that continue to resonate to this very day (god dammit). Now the Internet thinks "R-Word" is a good idea. Why? The word is "Retard." It's okay to say retard. What's not okay is demeaning people by calling them any derogatory term, and blacklisting words thinking that will somehow correct the problem is the height of hubris -- as if there are no other suitable replacements. It's an attempt to take a shortcut to a societal problem. It is, in a word, retarded (you can look up the definition in a dictionary and see it's an appropriate usage).
According to some (now in power):
States have Rights only while the States conform. (See the Governor of Maine's "I'll see you in court" to Trump?)
Much like Speech is Free so long as it conforms. (The Washington Post continues to find out.)
Guys (and Gals), hold on now. Sure, it's a recall for all Cybertrucks, but don't overreact! I'm sure an over-the-air software patch is incoming to fix this issue!
(That's a joke.)
Right. Just because sometimes we have to accept something, doesn't mean we have to like it.
(Though the other commenter implied people commonly or always angered by fact, but then we have nothing to talk about.)