Really depends on how we want it to work, I always program in redundant interactions that perform the same task, since some people like to tap and others swipe
His whole series is worth watching. And seriously, this post is so much more informative and less party-politics than the other post on here about that “war-time” housing plan 🙄
The article specifically says will “explore” higher density in the future, which is a vague promise at best. Other local articles I’ve read also paint a picture of mostly SFH designs or at best some other kind of low density design. They’ve had 7 years to address this issue, “explore” is hardly promising.
I thought we moved past this unconstructive, passive aggressive behaviour on Lemmy when we left Reddit? Other posters here have been a lot more constructive, like Cygnus and LostWon, for example.
Oh nice, I read another article that didn’t mention have as much detail than CBC’s. but that’s still low rise builds, and “potentially” explore higher density…that’s a big if
Their solution is more single family zoning urban sprawl…this is sheer insanity, they’ve had 7 years and all they’ve got is “we’ve tried nothing and we’re out of ideas”?
Truly feels like a “we’ve tried nothing, and we’re out of ideas!” situation, it’s almost comical.
It seems like these are blueprints for single family homes, so we’ll be stuck with car-based city designs that aren’t helping us solve the housing crisis in the first place…
Good point 👀
Really depends on how we want it to work, I always program in redundant interactions that perform the same task, since some people like to tap and others swipe
mlem 👻🐱
Oh wow feels bad :/
What happened to Evermote? 😂 I used it so much when u was in uni, so sad
Agreed haha 🤤🤤
His whole series is worth watching. And seriously, this post is so much more informative and less party-politics than the other post on here about that “war-time” housing plan 🙄
The article specifically says will “explore” higher density in the future, which is a vague promise at best. Other local articles I’ve read also paint a picture of mostly SFH designs or at best some other kind of low density design. They’ve had 7 years to address this issue, “explore” is hardly promising.
I thought we moved past this unconstructive, passive aggressive behaviour on Lemmy when we left Reddit? Other posters here have been a lot more constructive, like Cygnus and LostWon, for example.
Ya co-ops would be a nice addition too. And removing parking space requirements/single family/duplex zoning from most urban areas.
Oh nice, I read another article that didn’t mention have as much detail than CBC’s. but that’s still low rise builds, and “potentially” explore higher density…that’s a big if
Their solution is more single family zoning urban sprawl…this is sheer insanity, they’ve had 7 years and all they’ve got is “we’ve tried nothing and we’re out of ideas”?
The tab bar navigation branch has just been merged in ahaha🤭
I suppose we could make it a double tap gesture 👀
Truly feels like a “we’ve tried nothing, and we’re out of ideas!” situation, it’s almost comical.
It seems like these are blueprints for single family homes, so we’ll be stuck with car-based city designs that aren’t helping us solve the housing crisis in the first place…
🫶
Probably? I haven’t been paying attention to the icon stuff 🙈 yea I’m not happy about that delay either
Branch is ready, would love some testing before we start looking at merging it in 🫶
Will do this sometime this week, then get the feature merged in!
In the meantime, there’s a temporary thing coming before that lets you tap to scroll to top (not the same PR or feature set)
Fix is incoming for QuickLook view (images) disappearing when rotating device 🫠
You good :p Would appreciate feedback when feature makes it out in the wild 🤓