SmokeInFog

u/SmokeInFog@midwest.social
137 posts · 252 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

Given that

  1. readers were given unreliable information about whether they were reading an AI story or human story as a control
  2. Readers rated stories as better when they thought it was written by a human

This seems to be a result about bias, namely that readers are generally biased against AI. I see nothing in this that would warrant saying AI generated stories are better

I'll probably get downvoted for having some hope (cope?) in thinking that Trump really does represent an extreme and not a new normal. There's no way future DOJ will enforce this asinine "forever" stipulation. In a sane world it would jump them to the top of the list as soon as new leadership is installed, and I do actually think we are going to head back to at least a slightly more sane world