Thanks @Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show ,
"Packaging" is not mandatory when creating a software, like it's was written It could run as .py trough python executable. but here it seem not
root: file /boot/broadcom/initrd.gz
initrd.gz: Zstandard compressed data ....
root: unmkinitramfs /boot/broadcom/initrd.gz Extracted/
# data where extracted to Extracted/
# but I go few error like:
# cpio: cannot link usr/sbin/vconfig to usr/sbin/watchdog: Operation not permitted
Nix stores all packages in isolation from each other; as a result there are no /bin, /sbin, /lib or /usr directories and all packages are kept in /nix/store instead.
Thank you @skami@sh.itjust.works
Xpra works ! tons of features, floss and Python π ! β€
Thanks everyone,
I figured out also the missing
./but meanwhile I got already 4 reply ! \Thanks so much !
Ideally running the .py
python foobar.pywill be ideal, otherwise an .appimageI think I will have to build it my self (the .appimage ) :)
I like light system and moreover I like the simplicity of .appimage
source: https://www.booleanworld.com/creating-linux-apps-run-anywhere-appimage/
Thanks @fratermus@lemmy.sdf.org But graph-easy is text to graph. and I'm looking to draw ! so draw to ~graph(ASCII) but it's a nice program too.
I'm not, I'm on MX Linux with SysVinit.
Thanks @Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show , "Packaging" is not mandatory when creating a software, like it's was written It could run as .py trough python executable. but here it seem not
Otherwise I'm ok with .appimage format/packing.
RSS guard NoWebEngine version
SOLVED
The following works !
I guess one of my others rules was blocking
Hi, Thank to all of you.
I made a test environment with the following.
The goal is to send a ping A to B, B forward to C
So
ping -4c 1 192.168.y.2from A, should ping B fw CI've set the following rule in /etc/nftables.conf
but is not working :'(
I see B receive the package
but it seem C receive nothing..
Any ideas ?
As I want the system to be quite ( not sending data ) I was suspected the
outputhook to be the one. what are you suggesting ?Obviously, but I'm anyway wondering why it doesn't blocking like it should
I hope nftables do not let other pass like this...
Thank you very much all, for your inputs !
I've did
::: spoiler
tree -Fan -L 2 Extracted:::
So it tend to confirm that even if the file is named initrd.gz it's actually an
initramfsmethod.... ( damn this is so misleading )So I guess I can follow preparing-linux from the guide and overwrite the initrd.gz ?
Thanks @SteveTech@programming.dev
I suppose the file
linux/arch/Kconfigis the base the menuconfig to know which option is available ? right ?Thanks.
Thanks, how can we verify this ?
I'm using Devuan ( systemd free ! ) :)
I believe my initramfs do not support luks encryption, but the link of @DrDystopia@lemy.lol might work.... π€
Thanks @DrDystopia@lemy.lol ! indeed https://github.com/gitbls/sdm/blob/master/Docs/Disk-Encryption.md#the-sdm-cryptconfig-script seem what I need. I'll try
ohh ! great ! I'll see if I manage to install it on Devuan Thanks.
π€© Woo I didn't know
nix. It seem a better way to handle package !!!But so if I have already
aptthat handle packages, is it compatible to use both on the same system !?