"Other animals do it to each other, so why not us?" "Animals don't have sophisticated minds, so it doesn't actually cause them real suffering." "Humans need animal protein to be healthy." etc. All terribly weak arguments that are easily refuted.
if you care to articulate these refutations, i'd be fascinated to see how strong your arguments are.
operation mocking bird seems relevant
communism is stateless and classless. there is no top
you can leave
you can leave
I, too, cried.
I decided to turn 24 the next year.
no. words mean things.
if you voted for Kamala, you got the same result as everyone else.
how's that iran war going? we sure helped palestine by throwing away our vote, huh? fucking idiot clowns
I like it
this can't be true
you seem to be creating a link between emotion and consent, but you haven't explicated any of it.
the post either is true or it is not. your characterization side steps any real discussion of the topic and it's, on its face, bad faith
and pretty much no one does that anyway
I love this community
Wikipedia
too fast. it needs a little more setup.
this is a strawman
if you care to articulate these refutations, i'd be fascinated to see how strong your arguments are.
so why do you keep bringing it up? it's absurd to discuss consent from something that is incapable of consent.
you haven't shown why you think this is reasonable from subjects which are incapable of consent, nor bothered to define feelings.
the only respect that matters, in this case, is the ability to consent.