Soros has donated literally hundred of millions of dollars to liberal and left wing causes. Some of his donations have been referred to as "dark money". This is not news - it's been well documented.
My point is that he's a left wing guy, so no one in the media cares.
LA recently reaffirmed its status as a sanctuary city. And the cities and states along the Southern border are overwhelmed by illegal immigrants. So this is a match made in heaven.
He never claimed to be an absolutist. He never planned in allowing things like vioent threats, for example.
And he's right about those terms - they are used as slurs to shut down discussion. It's a quick and easy way to belittle someone and trivialize their argument.
Bad example. The cases where businesses could refuse service to a customer were due to religious freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Not liking Trump would not fall under that category. Not sure about the other example though.
In general though, I think this would be fine. As long as this business is not funded or supported by taxpayer money.
You may think it overused, but it's accurate. Access to education may be a human right (i.e. a person is free to seek out an education), but forcing someone else to pay for it is not.
Are you a female Senator from MA?
Lol. Funny that you are being downvoted because you are absolutely correct.
I guess the deadbeats don't care - they just want their free money from the taxpayers.
What about those who took out loans, paid them back, AND paid $80k+ in extra taxes due to the degree they got?
Fuck those people, right?
If you took out a loan, you pay it back. You. Not the taxpayers.
Soros has donated literally hundred of millions of dollars to liberal and left wing causes. Some of his donations have been referred to as "dark money". This is not news - it's been well documented.
My point is that he's a left wing guy, so no one in the media cares.
Lol. It's not "judicial overreach" to stop an unconstitutional spending spree by the President. That spending must go through Congress.
Wahhh! The Court is following the Constitution and I don't like it!!!
Just like they faked the Hunter Biden laptop story
Trump is such a moron. I really want him to just go away. Just go play golf and eat McDonald's.
But thank God for his SJC picks. I shudder to think who Hillary would've appointed.
Big surprise. When Democrats don't get what they want, they change the rules.
Any politician who supports a court packing scheme should be removed from office.
When FDR (Democrat) tried something similar, his own party was outraged. Luckily his "court packing scheme" never came to be.
God, she's such a dolt. Like most Democrats, she thinks the court exists to further their agenda. That's not how it works.
The SC decides whether or not something is Constitutional. The Court is beholden to the Constitution, not any particular political party.
This is wonderful news.
LA recently reaffirmed its status as a sanctuary city. And the cities and states along the Southern border are overwhelmed by illegal immigrants. So this is a match made in heaven.
The Supreme Court is simply following the Constitution, as it should. It's refreshing to see.
He should propose that those who took out student loans should pay them back. That is what really should happen.
He never claimed to be an absolutist. He never planned in allowing things like vioent threats, for example.
And he's right about those terms - they are used as slurs to shut down discussion. It's a quick and easy way to belittle someone and trivialize their argument.
Bad example. The cases where businesses could refuse service to a customer were due to religious freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Not liking Trump would not fall under that category. Not sure about the other example though.
In general though, I think this would be fine. As long as this business is not funded or supported by taxpayer money.
Lol. It's totally cool when the money comes from George Soris though, right?
Wonderful news. Two great legal decisions.
This is why electing Trump was so important. He's just awful, but Hillary's SJC picks would've been a disaster.
I think this is the only workable solution.
What a great piece of tv history. They should publish that and sell it.
Perhaps. But the government forced companies to close. So it seems appropriate that the government should reimburse them.
No one "forced" anyone to get a student loan. The government certainly didn't.
You may think it overused, but it's accurate. Access to education may be a human right (i.e. a person is free to seek out an education), but forcing someone else to pay for it is not.