Where do you think Engels would place them on his "stages of barbarism"? The "lower stage of barbarism" he gave to the Iroquois Confederacy and I would be interested in the assessment of the working family of cavelivers.
The discussion about forcibly moving a community from blahaj to dbz0 without participation from the other mods. I do not respect someone who has a form of power taking actions like that.
However aomeone's behaviour on another instance does not mean we need to follow their example. I do not know if this is the mask that slipped to use the expression or if they intended to always be a trojan. But the actions on moving an instance here without consultation with the mods is not good.
I am not sure what the other preventative actions have been taken. Is it feasible to defederate from this and any other instance that is administered from this person who has virtually attacked the flotilla?
The people need to take high humidity more seriously. The difference between low and high humidity while sit in the shade with the fan and the lack of clothing can be a hot summer's day and certain death.
It had to be recognised this doesn't happen in a vacuum. The raw materials are already being mined and people are refining them and people already creating optics and so on. All of these people already exist in the world and there thousands of people in hundreds of universities and schools that are eager to do this.
I am expecting that you assume this can happen only in a command and control structure as today rather than the free association of people which is why it would surprise me that after anarchism is achieved that medicine collapses and technology collapses. I hope that people continue what they are doing (in ASML for example) because they love what they do. The hammers are not taken to industry like luddites.
The discussion then is not could this work (because people do this today and people want to continue to do this today and more people want to do this in the future) but instead the allocation of resources and tasks. Our understanding of how to connect and collaborate and create have evolved many since Engel in 1840s manchester factory.
"The common plan" is not synonymous with "the organisational structure" or "the company".
The common goal is to build a chip fabrication plant.
The expertise to do this is plentiful and the desire to do this are common. If tomorrow the technology were fully open and available and not guarded behind trademarks and trade secregts and if the detailed instructions are available to all what else is there to stop people from doing the building?
The people who want to cooperate with the other people to build the plant... can?
If the people do not want to, there is nothing that will force them. Why should they be forced?
They say that the communists are a cancer, a threat to civilization. They should be identified and debanked and persecuted. They then label everyone they dont like as communists...
What has helped me with my imagination is the idea of the abolishment of money and private (not personal) property. In any society without those two things the burden of being is just not there.
In most societies the pressure that you mustwork for the sake of working because you must have money makes people desperate. If you do not work you do not get money and then you starve and you are homeless. I ask people "imagine if money is no longer issue. What would you do..." then they see the world through different eyes.
Your question on trust and law today is with that punishing system of work and money and capital. Remove that burden and you remove a lot of those challenges. You begin to no longer judge crimes of need, you begin to mediate conflict of interests.
It is a long path. It is not easy and is against the nature of everything around you. That is why it is revolutionary.
AHH! It can talk!
But you so ooky dooky spoopy scary bogmonster!
Where do you think Engels would place them on his "stages of barbarism"? The "lower stage of barbarism" he gave to the Iroquois Confederacy and I would be interested in the assessment of the working family of cavelivers.
The discussion about forcibly moving a community from blahaj to dbz0 without participation from the other mods. I do not respect someone who has a form of power taking actions like that.
However aomeone's behaviour on another instance does not mean we need to follow their example. I do not know if this is the mask that slipped to use the expression or if they intended to always be a trojan. But the actions on moving an instance here without consultation with the mods is not good.
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/73031377
The bookmark looks so cute!
I am not sure what the other preventative actions have been taken. Is it feasible to defederate from this and any other instance that is administered from this person who has virtually attacked the flotilla?
I was going to joke that it gets good in season 3? Season 4? And it turns out that it is season 4!
DS9 is just a soap opera but in space.
When does it get good?
That is unhinged behaviour and that sounds explicitly malicious and WE should defederate from hostile instances that target our infrastructure.
I'm sure DDOSes are a crime in the jurisdiction they are in and in whatever value system they respect.
Open-source enthusiasts and proprietary software? That does not sound like the happy union.
The people need to take high humidity more seriously. The difference between low and high humidity while sit in the shade with the fan and the lack of clothing can be a hot summer's day and certain death.
It had to be recognised this doesn't happen in a vacuum. The raw materials are already being mined and people are refining them and people already creating optics and so on. All of these people already exist in the world and there thousands of people in hundreds of universities and schools that are eager to do this.
I am expecting that you assume this can happen only in a command and control structure as today rather than the free association of people which is why it would surprise me that after anarchism is achieved that medicine collapses and technology collapses. I hope that people continue what they are doing (in ASML for example) because they love what they do. The hammers are not taken to industry like luddites.
The discussion then is not could this work (because people do this today and people want to continue to do this today and more people want to do this in the future) but instead the allocation of resources and tasks. Our understanding of how to connect and collaborate and create have evolved many since Engel in 1840s manchester factory.
"The common plan" is not synonymous with "the organisational structure" or "the company".
The common goal is to build a chip fabrication plant.
The expertise to do this is plentiful and the desire to do this are common. If tomorrow the technology were fully open and available and not guarded behind trademarks and trade secregts and if the detailed instructions are available to all what else is there to stop people from doing the building?
The people who want to cooperate with the other people to build the plant... can?
If the people do not want to, there is nothing that will force them. Why should they be forced?
What in the LLM response is this.
They say that the communists are a cancer, a threat to civilization. They should be identified and debanked and persecuted. They then label everyone they dont like as communists...
First they came for the anti-capitalists, the anti-imperialists, the communists, the anarchists and the marxist.
If the 8 sided shape looked more like the "symbol of chaos" with the 8 arrows then it might work better as the flag
This is not fine
What has helped me with my imagination is the idea of the abolishment of money and private (not personal) property. In any society without those two things the burden of being is just not there.
In most societies the pressure that you must work for the sake of working because you must have money makes people desperate. If you do not work you do not get money and then you starve and you are homeless. I ask people "imagine if money is no longer issue. What would you do..." then they see the world through different eyes.
Your question on trust and law today is with that punishing system of work and money and capital. Remove that burden and you remove a lot of those challenges. You begin to no longer judge crimes of need, you begin to mediate conflict of interests.
It is a long path. It is not easy and is against the nature of everything around you. That is why it is revolutionary.
The swoletariat stronk.