"US does the same" posts article of a news site covering the topic that was "cracked down on". I don't think you know what cracked down on means in the PRC.
As a helicopter mechanic, this may not look like a lot, but I can 100% guarantee that the entire helicopter is a write off with that dammage. You would have to rip apart the entire helicopter and put it back together with a bunch of brand new parts for it to be safe again. This at the very least is a total refit requirement. Or some Russian pilots can go die after they did not realize one of those balls embeded itself in the transmission, either works.
I sure hope your right, but we did not just give them stuff and tell them to figure it out, we trained them for 20 years, with the most experienced soldiers in the world. It's obviously a motivation and culture issue, so maybe after they realize how shit things have gone they may make a change, but I am not holding my breath.
The largest military in the world occupied their country and gave them billions in equipment to keep it and they let the taliban retake everything in weeks. I don't think there is going to be any better opportunity then that. It's obvious that the fighting population already made their choice, and now everyone just has to enjoy it.
Actually if you measure by gdp then the us makes the top 10 along with a bunch of smaller eastern European countries, but all of the major European countries like Germany, France, or Spain don't even make the list.
The us completely outstrips the EU and all member states individual contributions militarily. The EU only beats the us if you consider only monetary contributions (which are then mostly used to purchase lend lease equipment at a discount from, again, the us.) Or have strings attached so they can't be used directly in the conflict. That's not to say the eu contributions are small, but it's not anywhere close to being twice, even if you include monetary donations that don't directly help the war effort until it is converted to military spending.
Yea it's very cute that all these islamic leaders just pretend the ugyars don't exist but when there is a chance to screw over Israel the first place they visit to ask for humanitarian assistance is the country that is currently ethnicly cleansing an entire population of Muslims. Israel should be called out, but coming from these guys its more about attacking Israel then saving the people of Gaza.
Yea the thing this article puts in the fine print is he has not been convicted of any crimes, he has not had his bail revoked by the judge, and none of the alleged crimes were fellonius. If any of these three conditions had been met, he would not have his weapons. The case was not struck down due to a 2A violation, it was struck down because it's unconstitutional under the due process clause, and pretty black and white at that. If he endangered the public after his arraignment the judge should have revoked his bail.
Unfortunately this glitch was patched recently after Jeff's assa- I mean suicide
and I am the tooth fairy.
"US does the same" posts article of a news site covering the topic that was "cracked down on". I don't think you know what cracked down on means in the PRC.
Graphic design is my passion ✨️
Sheepdog theory for the modern age, truly magnificent
Lmao biggest self report of 2k23, and almost at the very end too
Man just posts straight misinformation to the internet, how could he.
As a helicopter mechanic, this may not look like a lot, but I can 100% guarantee that the entire helicopter is a write off with that dammage. You would have to rip apart the entire helicopter and put it back together with a bunch of brand new parts for it to be safe again. This at the very least is a total refit requirement. Or some Russian pilots can go die after they did not realize one of those balls embeded itself in the transmission, either works.
IM AT SHIRT!
WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU'RE AT SHIRT? WHAT STORE ARE YOU IN?!
I AM AT THE SHIRT STORE!
WHY ARE YOU BUYING SHOES AT THE SHIRT STORE?
FUCK YOU!
I sure hope your right, but we did not just give them stuff and tell them to figure it out, we trained them for 20 years, with the most experienced soldiers in the world. It's obviously a motivation and culture issue, so maybe after they realize how shit things have gone they may make a change, but I am not holding my breath.
The largest military in the world occupied their country and gave them billions in equipment to keep it and they let the taliban retake everything in weeks. I don't think there is going to be any better opportunity then that. It's obvious that the fighting population already made their choice, and now everyone just has to enjoy it.
Actually if you measure by gdp then the us makes the top 10 along with a bunch of smaller eastern European countries, but all of the major European countries like Germany, France, or Spain don't even make the list.
The us completely outstrips the EU and all member states individual contributions militarily. The EU only beats the us if you consider only monetary contributions (which are then mostly used to purchase lend lease equipment at a discount from, again, the us.) Or have strings attached so they can't be used directly in the conflict. That's not to say the eu contributions are small, but it's not anywhere close to being twice, even if you include monetary donations that don't directly help the war effort until it is converted to military spending.
Yea it's very cute that all these islamic leaders just pretend the ugyars don't exist but when there is a chance to screw over Israel the first place they visit to ask for humanitarian assistance is the country that is currently ethnicly cleansing an entire population of Muslims. Israel should be called out, but coming from these guys its more about attacking Israel then saving the people of Gaza.
You can say that in any us state?
Digital License: commercial use, such as with video game osts, movie commissions, or streaming service licensing fees from record labels.
MP3: pay-to-download services.
Mil - seventeen-hundred Civ - seventeen-o'clock
Yea the thing this article puts in the fine print is he has not been convicted of any crimes, he has not had his bail revoked by the judge, and none of the alleged crimes were fellonius. If any of these three conditions had been met, he would not have his weapons. The case was not struck down due to a 2A violation, it was struck down because it's unconstitutional under the due process clause, and pretty black and white at that. If he endangered the public after his arraignment the judge should have revoked his bail.
Iranian navy sailors: now is an excellent time to consider retirement, just a bit of a hunch you see.