I dunno, I think it's fine if a company wants to limit the reach of a marketing campaign for a few hours.
If someone chooses to pay Netflix more than they otherwise would so they can watch an advertisement earlier then everyone else, then that says much more about the viewer than it does about the companies involved.
It does as much as does "testifying under oath" does to magically stop you from lying.
i.e., putting your hand on a significant bit of text and saying some special words doesn't stop you from lying, but it DOES create / enhance penalties if you do.
Nah it's a paradox. There's no such thing as just a freestanding Monte Carlo test that you can just "run" - you do actually need to define enough parameters to make it tell you anything.
This kind of self-referential stuff feels like a proof of Gödel's incompleteness theorems with extra steps.
In this case, that could be strategic voting. We in Michigan can vote for either the blue or the red primary (no party commitment ahead of time), but it has to be consistent the whole way down.
James was clearly going to win, so the strategic option for team red was to vote for whichever blue candidate they'd rather face in the general for this more competitive race.
Running a GameCube (23 watts) literally nonstop for a year would use a little over 200 kWh.
Assuming average USA electricity prices, in 2002 electricity cost ~$0.09 per kWh, so one year of that would cost an additional $18.00. That number only tends worse going forward.
You're absolutely right! It's not just flawed — it's impossible to enforce.
/s
More seriously, the core issue isn't completely novel to large established open-source projects. How do they deal with the possibility that someone might be contributing code from, say, a closed-source competing product (or one whose licence is otherwise incompatible)?
And then the term you'd want to look up for the claim about his last name is "endonym", though you also don't need to look further than the intro on this Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Hungary
I don't know about that...
JXL has a lossless mode, which is what they're referring to. Sounds like a fair comparison to me.
I dunno, I think it's fine if a company wants to limit the reach of a marketing campaign for a few hours.
If someone chooses to pay Netflix more than they otherwise would so they can watch an advertisement earlier then everyone else, then that says much more about the viewer than it does about the companies involved.
It does as much as does "testifying under oath" does to magically stop you from lying.
i.e., putting your hand on a significant bit of text and saying some special words doesn't stop you from lying, but it DOES create / enhance penalties if you do.
Nah it's a paradox. There's no such thing as just a freestanding Monte Carlo test that you can just "run" - you do actually need to define enough parameters to make it tell you anything.
This kind of self-referential stuff feels like a proof of Gödel's incompleteness theorems with extra steps.
In this case, that could be strategic voting. We in Michigan can vote for either the blue or the red primary (no party commitment ahead of time), but it has to be consistent the whole way down.
James was clearly going to win, so the strategic option for team red was to vote for whichever blue candidate they'd rather face in the general for this more competitive race.
Term limited
I think the person you're replying to was responding to this bit from the article:
I believe the comment you're responding to was referring to OP's post title, not the comment in the post that was responding to the DHS statement
Having started with OpenJUMP, I assure you that there are deeper depths to be explored.
This deal is getting worse all the time...
The IPO reportedly raised $85 billion
Valuation (which is where that "over $1 trillion" comes from) is a different thing entirely
fixed, lol
Was that supposed to be wcscoll, not wcsoll?
https://youtu.be/WLfAf8oHrMo
You're already traveling at the speed of light minus 1m/s relative to a reference frame that's traveling away from you at that speed.
Running a GameCube (23 watts) literally nonstop for a year would use a little over 200 kWh.
Assuming average USA electricity prices, in 2002 electricity cost ~$0.09 per kWh, so one year of that would cost an additional $18.00. That number only tends worse going forward.
A GameCube memory card would cost about $11.
As usual, it's more expensive to be poor.
This sure looks like C# to me, not C/C++
You're absolutely right! It's not just flawed — it's impossible to enforce.
/s
More seriously, the core issue isn't completely novel to large established open-source projects. How do they deal with the possibility that someone might be contributing code from, say, a closed-source competing product (or one whose licence is otherwise incompatible)?
The same answer ought to work here, probably.
/uj
I had to look it up.
Source confirming the main part of OP's post: https://telex.hu/zacc/2026/04/16/mi-a-fenet-jelent-az-hogy-abszolut-filmszinhaz
And then the term you'd want to look up for the claim about his last name is "endonym", though you also don't need to look further than the intro on this Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Hungary