Even better when it also does "emergency avoidance" and sends you right into guardrails or oncoming traffic. That happens only once to you unwanted during the lifetime of the car and you immediately turn that shit off forever.
There should be a ceiling with patents, where if you make 10x back of what it cost your r&d (or whatever 5x of your yearly revenue), the patent should just be considered expired no matter how much time passed.
I mean that you would have to test yourself. To me it seems like AI funnily enough has the same issues as humans, and that's that it works worse in legacy codebases full of tech debt, and in large monoliths.
Personally, I think a moral company would offer permanent discounts to long term customers, but there isn't a single company on earth I'm aware of that actually does that.
JetBrains do it with their IDE subscriptions, they give you a massive discount if you're subscribed for a few years, and even time on stuff like their educational license counts towards that. Super refreshing to see.
I mean if you write malware "for a good cause" plenty of people will rightfully judge you for subverting their expectations, and the reasoning doesn't matter thst much. And it's not like they're completely in the wrong either.
...but do yoz "understand libraries" by reading every line of their code, or by reading the documentation? And only in the parts you're actually interested in?
No; I think these bills are terrible and should be resisted. But the outrage about (what is effectively) a database on your pc to store information that itself doesn't do anything is ridiculous.
If abyone wants or needs to implement a system like that (could be for work,for example), that's perfectly fine. What isn't fine is the existence of the laws in the first place, and they shouldn't be resisted with (just) technology.
I could imagine a parental control setup using this information, for example. Linux is really behind in this regard and it's time it started catching up IMO.
Soooo you're not actually arguing for cURL but for bash scripts and potentially something else.
And now you come across all the issues that come with that, like portability, the inevitable messiness of Bash (and the fact that people actually need to learn it unlike a GUI tool that uses simple JS for scripting), and you lose all the convenience of a nice UX and stuff like validation that comes with it.
In other words your argument is about as valid as people who argue that vim is the peak of IDEs and noone ever needs anything else. Which - I really hope - you realize is a bit crazy.
Commissions are perfectly fine as long as they're upfront about the price and it's not percentage based. Then you basically just pay for a service / someone's time.
And title.search is a problem with the government... Civilized countries have national registries of who exactlx owns what, and in the best ones you can freely look it up online, too.
Efficient yes, but humanoid robots are much more likely to be accepted by the general public.
Have you considered that the down votes are because your comment adds nothing to the discussion except ragebait?
Even better when it also does "emergency avoidance" and sends you right into guardrails or oncoming traffic. That happens only once to you unwanted during the lifetime of the car and you immediately turn that shit off forever.
There should be a ceiling with patents, where if you make 10x back of what it cost your r&d (or whatever 5x of your yearly revenue), the patent should just be considered expired no matter how much time passed.
It should never be an infinite source of money.
I mean that you would have to test yourself. To me it seems like AI funnily enough has the same issues as humans, and that's that it works worse in legacy codebases full of tech debt, and in large monoliths.
But it can still be an invaluable tool.
Indeed the more skilled you are the more infuriating it becomes when it does the dumbest shit.
It can write code decently well and fast, and is amazing at finding stuff in a large project.
But you still 100% need to verify what it does and truly understand it.
JetBrains do it with their IDE subscriptions, they give you a massive discount if you're subscribed for a few years, and even time on stuff like their educational license counts towards that. Super refreshing to see.
OpenAI literally has Google connectors to work with your documents. This is meaningless.
It can still be pretty difficult to jump ship for any large corporation, but yeah there's certainly harder things.
I mean if you write malware "for a good cause" plenty of people will rightfully judge you for subverting their expectations, and the reasoning doesn't matter thst much. And it's not like they're completely in the wrong either.
...but do yoz "understand libraries" by reading every line of their code, or by reading the documentation? And only in the parts you're actually interested in?
Yeah, and I'm never going to use it, just like I don't use any of the other existing fields - it doesn't matter.
No; I think these bills are terrible and should be resisted. But the outrage about (what is effectively) a database on your pc to store information that itself doesn't do anything is ridiculous.
If abyone wants or needs to implement a system like that (could be for work,for example), that's perfectly fine. What isn't fine is the existence of the laws in the first place, and they shouldn't be resisted with (just) technology.
I could imagine a parental control setup using this information, for example. Linux is really behind in this regard and it's time it started catching up IMO.
There are even open source tools that do the same thing.
Also, yeah, if something solves a problem, it can be worth it to pay for it even if it's proprietary.
There are genuinely useful use cases for it, and unlike what you suggest it is completely harmless.
Soooo you're not actually arguing for cURL but for bash scripts and potentially something else.
And now you come across all the issues that come with that, like portability, the inevitable messiness of Bash (and the fact that people actually need to learn it unlike a GUI tool that uses simple JS for scripting), and you lose all the convenience of a nice UX and stuff like validation that comes with it.
In other words your argument is about as valid as people who argue that vim is the peak of IDEs and noone ever needs anything else. Which - I really hope - you realize is a bit crazy.
Commissions are perfectly fine as long as they're upfront about the price and it's not percentage based. Then you basically just pay for a service / someone's time.
And title.search is a problem with the government... Civilized countries have national registries of who exactlx owns what, and in the best ones you can freely look it up online, too.