Narcissism maybe? It's infuriating and really dissuades me from contributing in-depth answers here, which is such a shame. If I'm responding to someone I'm not just responding to help the person, I want to help anyone who might be searching for an answer in the future. It seems like a real design flaw that the OP can unilaterally decide to (effectively) remove an entire topic on their whim when others have contributed more to it than they did.
By my definition it's harmless almost by definition. It's meant to be fun mischief, otherwise it's not really trolling. I suppose somebody could take it the wrong way but "I'm just trolling" should be enough to counteract that otherwise it's something more serious.
The media latched on to the term in some time in the 2010s and equated it to serious online harassment but that's not how it was originally used.
Of course, there it is, they took their time on that one. It does kind of undermine the argument against the BBC though by posting fake quotes while waiting for the actual evidence.
That doesn't contain the quote and was released months ago.
It's not that I disagree with @BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 's sentiment here, I just think it's bad to misattribute a quote like that, there's enough misinformation going around as it is.
I never look at my phone for the time, it's inconvenient to get out every time I want to check the time, but a wall clock is just there to glance over at.
It's dangerous, yes, but why put any weight on anything he says? He lies all the time. If Trump says a boulder is about to fall on my head I wouldn't believe it. Beyond that I don't really care much about "American discourse" if it doesn't involve getting rid of Trump.
I suppose they could, but it would almost definitely be proprietary software and almost definitely include all the anti-features you see in Windows 11 which would defeat the point. If they released it as free software (FOSS) that would be an unqualified win but that's very unlikely.
Well that's what Wine is, it's native Linux software, so if you're running something on Wine you're (technically) running it natively on Linux, it's a compatibility layer for Windows applications to run on Linux without breaking patents or having need to use Windows code. Of course clearly, as you know, there are shortcomings to Wine but that answers your question of where we are with this.
I've been using it for 20+ years so it's unlikely I'll ever change now. Can't say switching back and forth is too much of a pain, it's supported by virtually all desktop environments and switching back and forth is usually just a keyboard shortcut once set up (in GNOME, which I use, it's super+space, though you can potentially annoy other people by leaving it in Dvorak).
I'd say some valid reasons not to switch are: common shortcuts are sometimes not so convenient (Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V both require two hands), can be worked around with customised hotkeys; relearning takes time, if you're already fluent in QWERTY it might not be worth the cost and personally I think speed benefits are overrated; also one-thumb typing on touchscreens tends to not be that efficient on Dvorak (I use Thumb-Key on my phone, though my phone is very much secondary for me). That said, I don't regret switching, and if you didn't learn to touch-type properly on QWERTY you may as well start fresh on Dvorak.
The problem is that TV is a slowly dying format, so any attempt at saving the BBC is an uphill struggle even with the best will for it. Which I think is a shame, I think it's culturally important. It needed to have evolved quicker and sooner, but how exactly I don't know.
The other alternatives: if all parties had contested it would split the vote. Any united progressive candidate would have trouble winning in Clacton. An all-party backed opposition candidate would have been unlikely and would easily be painted as "the establishment" by Farage.
As things are: an independent novelty candidate might actually have the best chance, small as it may be, of beating Farage if they can capture all the protest vote (the absolute majority of Clacton didn't vote Farage in the last election). Or worst, most likely, case Farage wins a hollow victory unopposed by major parties, he hasn't made his point, things stay the same only now he's seen as wasting everyone's time.
Narcissism maybe? It's infuriating and really dissuades me from contributing in-depth answers here, which is such a shame. If I'm responding to someone I'm not just responding to help the person, I want to help anyone who might be searching for an answer in the future. It seems like a real design flaw that the OP can unilaterally decide to (effectively) remove an entire topic on their whim when others have contributed more to it than they did.
By my definition it's harmless almost by definition. It's meant to be fun mischief, otherwise it's not really trolling. I suppose somebody could take it the wrong way but "I'm just trolling" should be enough to counteract that otherwise it's something more serious.
The media latched on to the term in some time in the 2010s and equated it to serious online harassment but that's not how it was originally used.
Of course, there it is, they took their time on that one. It does kind of undermine the argument against the BBC though by posting fake quotes while waiting for the actual evidence.
What's interesting is the BBC article from two years ago about the case contains much less bias.
That doesn't contain the quote and was released months ago.
It's not that I disagree with @BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 's sentiment here, I just think it's bad to misattribute a quote like that, there's enough misinformation going around as it is.
Where did you see that?
I never look at my phone for the time, it's inconvenient to get out every time I want to check the time, but a wall clock is just there to glance over at.
It's dangerous, yes, but why put any weight on anything he says? He lies all the time. If Trump says a boulder is about to fall on my head I wouldn't believe it. Beyond that I don't really care much about "American discourse" if it doesn't involve getting rid of Trump.
Trump says a lot of things...
I suppose they could, but it would almost definitely be proprietary software and almost definitely include all the anti-features you see in Windows 11 which would defeat the point. If they released it as free software (FOSS) that would be an unqualified win but that's very unlikely.
Well that's what Wine is, it's native Linux software, so if you're running something on Wine you're (technically) running it natively on Linux, it's a compatibility layer for Windows applications to run on Linux without breaking patents or having need to use Windows code. Of course clearly, as you know, there are shortcomings to Wine but that answers your question of where we are with this.
I've been using it for 20+ years so it's unlikely I'll ever change now. Can't say switching back and forth is too much of a pain, it's supported by virtually all desktop environments and switching back and forth is usually just a keyboard shortcut once set up (in GNOME, which I use, it's super+space, though you can potentially annoy other people by leaving it in Dvorak).
I'd say some valid reasons not to switch are: common shortcuts are sometimes not so convenient (Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V both require two hands), can be worked around with customised hotkeys; relearning takes time, if you're already fluent in QWERTY it might not be worth the cost and personally I think speed benefits are overrated; also one-thumb typing on touchscreens tends to not be that efficient on Dvorak (I use Thumb-Key on my phone, though my phone is very much secondary for me). That said, I don't regret switching, and if you didn't learn to touch-type properly on QWERTY you may as well start fresh on Dvorak.
I wouldn't necessarily say easier, but more ergonomic.
Another Dvorak user here, wouldn't be surprised if there are quite a few of us on Lemmy.
That means I can type without looking at the keyboard since my keyboard isn't labelled in Dvorak.
Then why bother us with it?
Correct, yes.
It's Cornish
I think that's Cornish actually.
The problem is that TV is a slowly dying format, so any attempt at saving the BBC is an uphill struggle even with the best will for it. Which I think is a shame, I think it's culturally important. It needed to have evolved quicker and sooner, but how exactly I don't know.
Good, that's the only way to play this one.
The other alternatives: if all parties had contested it would split the vote. Any united progressive candidate would have trouble winning in Clacton. An all-party backed opposition candidate would have been unlikely and would easily be painted as "the establishment" by Farage.
As things are: an independent novelty candidate might actually have the best chance, small as it may be, of beating Farage if they can capture all the protest vote (the absolute majority of Clacton didn't vote Farage in the last election). Or worst, most likely, case Farage wins a hollow victory unopposed by major parties, he hasn't made his point, things stay the same only now he's seen as wasting everyone's time.
I guess that to understand the concept of independence you'd also have to conceptualise other countries and there lies the problem.