Great question! Thanks for setting me up to reply: by spying on all us adults, that is the only way they can know. Their goal is to spy on all us adults!
It’s mentioned below. This post appears to align with this community’s rules but I see there are additional guidelines. I may make a few more changes to ensure it fits, though I’m cautious not to deviate too far from the original source of this cross post.
The first was a guide on how to respond to the term "sideloading" and the second was a video about the rise of facial recognition in supermarkets. The link provided was to a YouTube video titled "What You Don't Know About SAINSBURY'S and the AI BIOMETRIC PANOPTICON", although it was not clear that YouTube was referenced in the rules. The post above mentions that attempts were made to contact the admin for clarification but no response has been received.
Cross posts have been made no more than once to only few relevant communities, either as relevance was realised or at the request of other users. A clear explanation has been included at the top of each post. It’s not spamming, just sharing where it’s relevant.
Thanks for sharing this, really appreciate the clarity. Honestly, the interface, which they themselves created, doesn’t exactly make it obvious. You’re absolutely right that the original post doesn’t fall under that rule 4 either. And while I can’t say your sentiment on its content is unreasonable, removing the whole post, despite the constructive comments that were being left, doesn’t actually change the minds of the overwhelming number of users who left positive votes on both occasions.
Awful idea, if that worked we would have done it from the start.
Libre software is for taking back our computers, not controlling what others do with theirs.
You mean GNU+Linux. GNU does not make Linux.
Don't stop but the most direct response should be top.
Great question! Thanks for setting me up to reply: by spying on all us adults, that is the only way they can know. Their goal is to spy on all us adults!
Downvoted, this is never about kids, their goal is always to spy on adults. See my comment below.
That means spying on adults. Age bans cannot exist without spying on adults.
Never scroll past a post like that without exposing this.
Cut the personal attacks, like yours on the original commenter, and people in real life will talk to you too.
Getting on LinkedIn don't fix that.
When's the last time you put your real name, current location, employer, coworkers and work history on Lemmy?
It’s mentioned below. This post appears to align with this community’s rules but I see there are additional guidelines. I may make a few more changes to ensure it fits, though I’m cautious not to deviate too far from the original source of this cross post.
The first was a guide on how to respond to the term "sideloading" and the second was a video about the rise of facial recognition in supermarkets. The link provided was to a YouTube video titled "What You Don't Know About SAINSBURY'S and the AI BIOMETRIC PANOPTICON", although it was not clear that YouTube was referenced in the rules. The post above mentions that attempts were made to contact the admin for clarification but no response has been received.
This has already been addressed.
Unlikely to post this again, unless you or other users find or request that this be cross post to another relevant community.
Thanks for adding this. I encourage others to see comments on the linked post first.
Cross posts have been made no more than once to only few relevant communities, either as relevance was realised or at the request of other users. A clear explanation has been included at the top of each post. It’s not spamming, just sharing where it’s relevant.
Yes, a cross post to this community was requested in the comments, as shown at the top and bottom of this cross post.
A cross post to this community was requested in the comments, as shown at the top and bottom of this cross post.
Done, thanks!
Thanks for the analysis but there is no indication that any video was posted more than once or that the creator is a Lemmy user.
Thanks for sharing this, really appreciate the clarity. Honestly, the interface, which they themselves created, doesn’t exactly make it obvious. You’re absolutely right that the original post doesn’t fall under that rule 4 either. And while I can’t say your sentiment on its content is unreasonable, removing the whole post, despite the constructive comments that were being left, doesn’t actually change the minds of the overwhelming number of users who left positive votes on both occasions.