even if they don’t falsely report they can omit information
That's why you always read the reports from all perspectives to fill in the gaps. You literally discount the "our freedom fighters" vs. "Their terrorists" speak yourself, instead of your convenient solution of appealing to mbfc (appeal to authority)
In these cases it’s better as a rule to compare the reporting with that of other sources.
It would be great if you actually lived by your own words and engaged with the topic at hand and not lazily cite mbfc.
Pretty good tbh. I was torn between Zorin, PopOS and Mint and settled Zorin because it also syncs nice with Graphene/Android via the App. You can choose between Mac, Windows and other type of Desktop looks and don't need an Terminal if you don't want to
IBM, IG Farben, Coca Cola, Hugo Boss, Volkswagen, Krupp, and many others were just doing regular business. And "privatization" definitely wasn't something invented by the Nazis. Got it.
Sovereign countries can’t choose their allies? Really? When long-time neutral countries have decided that not even being neutral will protect them anymore from invasion, your answer is that they should be invaded?
History started only in the 2000s for you. I understand.
Can you explain why supporting US interests in the middle east is bad (among others arms sales in "Israel"), but supporting US interests in Ukraine (arms sales, privatization) is good somehow?
I did you even acknowledged the example of banning beards but then pretend like you weren’t given evidence.
I acknowledged it, by telling you to focus on proving cultural genocide in the first place. No, targeting bearded people that espouse violent Muslim interpretations of Islam in order to "correct" their beliefs to non violent interpretation does not constitute cultural genocide (even if wasnt fully informed on the targeting of ideologically violent bearded people. That maybe constituting racial profiling, but not cultural genocide)
Your questions doesn't make sense, unless you consider US southern states in the US to be occupied as well
Do you consider southern states in the US occupied or a part of the US?
Can you name the countries that recognize Taiwan?
That's why you always read the reports from all perspectives to fill in the gaps. You literally discount the "our freedom fighters" vs. "Their terrorists" speak yourself, instead of your convenient solution of appealing to mbfc (appeal to authority)
It would be great if you actually lived by your own words and engaged with the topic at hand and not lazily cite mbfc.
Pretty good tbh. I was torn between Zorin, PopOS and Mint and settled Zorin because it also syncs nice with Graphene/Android via the App. You can choose between Mac, Windows and other type of Desktop looks and don't need an Terminal if you don't want to
Yeah, fuck Harris (And Trump).
Yes? What do you think I'm saying?
OP implied Capitalism isn't the economic base of fascism, the way I read it and were I'm responding to.
Good, because you'd get dunked on lib
Lol
Volkswagen, Siemens, IBM, Hugo Boss, and many others. Also socialists known to like privatization, not like the Nazis invented that, rightt?
IBM, IG Farben, Coca Cola, Hugo Boss, Volkswagen, Krupp, and many others were just doing regular business. And "privatization" definitely wasn't something invented by the Nazis. Got it.
When you are concern trolling about a characters sexual orientation in the movie sub, then you had it coming.
If you indeed asked in good faith, then there's a appeal process. Remember to more carefully word your questions pertaing to sexual minorities.
History started only in the 2000s for you. I understand.
Putting just randomly invading Ukraine. No interests, no security concerns, no geopolitics involved, am I right?
Oh so you don’t care about Israelis, just letting the Palestinians take hostages, got it.
Can you explain why supporting US interests in the middle east is bad (among others arms sales in "Israel"), but supporting US interests in Ukraine (arms sales, privatization) is good somehow?
Free Palestine, Fuck NATO.
NATO expansion
You can stop, I don't think BE will notice you
I acknowledged it, by telling you to focus on proving cultural genocide in the first place. No, targeting bearded people that espouse violent Muslim interpretations of Islam in order to "correct" their beliefs to non violent interpretation does not constitute cultural genocide (even if wasnt fully informed on the targeting of ideologically violent bearded people. That maybe constituting racial profiling, but not cultural genocide)
There are like this source BE uses https://medium.com/@sunfeiyang/breaking-down-the-bbcs-visit-to-hotan-xinjiang-e284934a7aab
Nothing to deny. You haven't proved it.