some 80% or more of the global soybean crop is pressed for oil. it's the industrial waste from that process that we give to animals, thus conserving resources.
inconvenience, social ostracization, and aesthetic deprivation are actual downsides. further you don't actually know what is good for them: you're not their doctor. finally, it would be better for the animals if it shrunk industry. the industry grows every year, so it is not any better for the animals.
veganism is quantifiably healthier and correlated with longevity.
in some respects for some people. some of the studies (china study, for instance) have been debunked, though.
you aren't a dietician. even if you are (i admit, i was guessing), you aren't my dietician, so maybe you shouldn't be telling other people what a healthy diet would be for them.
it's not for them, it's for anyone who might be taken in by them.
and i can't bring myself to think of them in dehumanizing terms like "bot" or even "shill". that level of discourse is toxic and thought-terminating. we should elevate the conversation.
itt: people justifying why their institution of mass murder is actually good
some 80% or more of the global soybean crop is pressed for oil. it's the industrial waste from that process that we give to animals, thus conserving resources.
it was quieter. it was easier to avoid distractions.
liberals are handing out blocks now? can I get one?
another user said it's like how christians call non-believers sinners. that makes sense to me.
lemmy with extra censorship tools
make any excuse you want. you don't know anything about me.
didn't you literally run away instead of staying and fighting in america?
inconvenience, social ostracization, and aesthetic deprivation are actual downsides. further you don't actually know what is good for them: you're not their doctor. finally, it would be better for the animals if it shrunk industry. the industry grows every year, so it is not any better for the animals.
because it's ineffective at addressing the issues facing the environment.
all of agriculture is only about 20% of our emissions, so this just can't be true.
in some respects for some people. some of the studies (china study, for instance) have been debunked, though.
you aren't a dietician. even if you are (i admit, i was guessing), you aren't my dietician, so maybe you shouldn't be telling other people what a healthy diet would be for them.
but if I vote for Biden, he might win. I don't want that, either
it's not for them, it's for anyone who might be taken in by them.
and i can't bring myself to think of them in dehumanizing terms like "bot" or even "shill". that level of discourse is toxic and thought-terminating. we should elevate the conversation.
this is election misinformation. my vote must be counted like anybody else.
this is election misinformation. my vote must be counted just like everyone else.
the people responsible for the victory of any candidate are the people who vote for that candidate. I'll be voting against trump
it's not biden's vote, it's mine, and Biden needs to earn it if he wants it.
only a vote for a candidate helps that candidate.
a vote for West is a vote against Trump and Biden.
it's not biden's vote, it's mine, and Biden needs to earn it if he wants it.
it's not biden's vote, it's mine, and Biden needs to earn it if he wants it.