piefed.social's server is coping fine but I recommend new people join any other instance. Look for one with a rocket or lightning icon - https://piefed.social/auth/instance_chooser
Hm, I wouldn't have known rocket is faster, since lightning is instantaneous in real life.
Perhaps a speedometer at different speeds and color chunks (low adds first 3rd is filled green, medium adds yellow to the next 3rd, fast adds red to last chunk) would be more intuitive? Though that could also be interpreted as server capacity if the word speed isn't next to the icon. Maybe a little icon legend somewhere nearby could help, or a question mark sign next to the speed icon that explains what it is?
It's not a technical stability we're talking about there - it's more human. Number of admins with SSH access, whether there are donations coming in, if there are daily backups.
I'm guessing it's because we fund our instances out of our own pockets, and donations don't cover the entire cost? If you're looking for future improvement ideas, I'd much rather that information be exposed directly, than the word "stability" which implies we have uptime issues
Although, with low social stability eventually there will be 0% uptime so they are related.
I think that's a bit harsh. As it is, Kaity and I would both have to get hit by buses for us to lose the ability to fund our instances. We're both well in to our careers, with sufficient earning power to cover the finances. We would both have to lose our incomes for the long term, before the site itself became threatened. Long enough to ask for community funding if it came to that.
In real world terms, we've been hosting fediverse instances out of our own pocket for over 3 years now, which is a time period few fediverse instances can match, and even fewer threadiverse instances.
Which is to say, I think our social stability is pretty reasonable by fediverse standards. There absolutely are instances out there with higher levels of social stability, but that's not because they have more community funding, it's because they have more users and more admins, which also comes with requisite organisational structures that lets them run their instances without any individual admins being the point of failure.
The intent of that checkbox in the instance chooser settings is really about gauging financial stability. So for people in your position donations from users don't matter so much and you could just tick it. I'm not auditing anyone!
Yes, this isn't a personal judgement about your particular circumstances. The instance chooser embeds assumptions about what tends to happen on average. As such it can never fully represent every situation.
how so. 2000 to 3000 is a 50% increase. in a period of days. I mean its not like the numbers are not there and the rate of increase for the year before is like 1600 to 2000 so like 30%. for the whole year.
I understand that but when I see a graph that does not start at zero I can take it into account. I get you though about best practice. Usually this type of thing I think is from software defaulting to it to avoid white space. At the extreme if you have something that is at a million and goes up to 1.1 million that can be a huge jump for a particular time span but if you started at zero it would just look like a straight line.
That's not what i meant to say, taking a closer look and trying to undestand it all is obbiously good.
But graphs have a big glance value and should be able to convey key information at a glance.
thats fair enough. I get the importance. Like this was to me easy enough to read but I know under different circumstances it can create a kind of mental gymnastics where its like, man, this should not take this much to figure out. Its not exactly the same scenario but I had a park near me put up a vertical map on the mouth of an east/west trail on the south side. The map follows the standard thing where up is north. I hit them up requesting the move the map structure to the other side of the trail because its exhausting turning everything around in your head where if it faced north everything would line up more naturally mentally.
Yeah... That works in the context where people actually share links. Various news communities definitely fit that description, but then there are several discussion communities where links aren't the main point. Take ask lemmy or no stupid questions for example. Oh, and then there are also picture communities like superbowl.
Lumping all of them together with "link aggregator" platforms doesn't fit very well. From a historical perspective that's fine though. As far as I know, Reddit started as a link aggregator, and diversified later.
yea I was just joking lol, there was recently a discussion about how join-lemmy was still saying "link aggregator" and everyone thought it was a terrible description
But I guess that's still technically correct, the best kind of correct. Still sounds odd, but I guess it kinda works as long as you use the term because of historical reasons.
Regardless, now that Lemmy/Piefed has become such diverse platforms, it's getting harder to nail it down into a single convenient term.
I think the defining feature of these platforms is the topic focused approach. On Mastodon, you care about the people who write whatever, while on Lemmy/Piefed, you care about a topic written by whoever.
Maybe this is showing my age and the association will not materialize in the minds of younger people, but boardnet makes me think of a bunch of old-school phpBB message board forums.
The forums I visited in those days was threaded, with trees to view commons. It was a proto version of the way Lemmy/Piefed/Reddit comments work, you just could only see one comment at a time. I never liked the flat style of PHPBB and the like.
It wasn't a common format for sure. It was the forums for BYOND, a "game engine" specifically designed to make multiplayer games easily. You could think of it as a proto roblox.
Every time I hear “censorship” cried in relation to piefed, I think of the same cries with Voat, another Reddit clone/refuge. It never compromised on that.
And it turned into a (now long dead) toxic wasteland. As that ethos smothered all the interesting niche communities.
IMO, the #1 Fediverse dev priority should be UX that discourages toxicity. That’s what will keep it alive. A militantly, forcibly “unbiased” UX is a quaint old internet ideal, yet it always seems to snowball into an unsustainable toxic monoculture.
So, if piefed uses “opinionated” defaults to stave that off, good.
"if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance"
Let’s see if piefed is as open as it claims to be. The creator and maintainer actually injects their own opinion into the source code. There are so many deny lists and a social score built into the system.
Piefed is great at putting in new features and making everything pretty. But it’s so opinionated, you’re better off on Reddit, imo.
You have point but on the other side, its goal is to avoid karma farming and help mods, admins for creating a serene place for discussion.
There is two distinct score : reputation, attitude.
Reputation is people's reaction to your comment and post.
attitude is how you vote. If you do mass downvote, your ability to downvote is removed until you reach a balance between upvote/downvote.
When we post a gif, and everyone laugh, it's easy to get a good reputation whereas elsewhere, i might post several terrible comments. That's why posting gif doesn't credit you reputation. You can't use gif to bypass bad comment and get a good reputation.
I'm now intervening as a mod. The povokative passive-aggressive tone you used is a big no.
Please, can you edit your comment and just tell us that you disagree with the score system and remove your source and reddit part ?
Maybe you wanted to see your post removed for proving your point even futher as "See ? Piefed's staff censorship ideas they doesn't agree."
I went to the your gif and read comments : you won't see that kind of content here. I also asked users to edit their comment, here, when they critized lemmy and i expect you to do the same.
Our goal, is to create a serene space for discussion. Nothing more.
Yes, i disagree with lemmy dev's political opinions but that's not the main reason we enjoy Piefed. And when Nutomic asked me to share lemmy contact and documentation in iceshrimp dev's channel, i helped him. :)
Let's go back to your post :
The beggining is aggressive. Are you testing if Piefed is open ?
The meme link. We are from various countries, so the american flag...
opiniated ? A software isn't neutral, it follows our ideas. For example i enjoy the rational discourse toolkit. :)
Reddit, was it necessary ? Last time i went there, i was surprised by the huge amount of bots and ads...we are better of on the fediverse, don't you think ?
You can disagree with the score system, the no federated vote...and explain your point, why this and that...but not the way you did.
So please edit your comment and remove those above part
Users can choose what they prefer :
the way communities are moderated and managed
their software and its features, ui...
And i'm happy for them they can choose their favorite pie. If you prefer Lemmy, that's great. :)
I cannot use a tone via text easily: see Poe’s law. It was meant to be informative and sort of speculative to the future of Piefed. I was happy when Piefed came around but this changed my view a little. I want all federation to succeed but having these things be embedded in the code and not flags to set (even though you can turn most off) just strikes me as concerning. I’m glad users have choices though, but we will still call out bad choices, as many do when calling out shitty instances like hexbear or .ml.
I will not remove the source and my opinion on it. I’ve been nothing but civil and understanding in the replies to my post and it’s clear it’s an opinion with using “imo”.
Your "source" is not a source of information : It is a meme. It doesn't create the conditions for discussion and debate. A meme doesn't invite people to share their thinking, people react.
That's quite different from someone explaining that Piefed has a set of rules that rate our behaviour. The mood and reaction is quite different from there. Do you notice it ?
No, i'm not asking you to remove your opinion that you disagree with piefed score. I never told you that. I'm asking you to rewrite your post and create a proper space for discussion. And i explained why above...
I have already had a proper space for discussion. I’ve been civil in the replies. This is crazy to even be arguing about. If it’s a meme, why do you care? Are we to just discuss and bicker on the internet or create a better space?
Remove it if you want for not conforming to your rules of speech. I’m done.
Oh I see your issue. You thought I was linking the meme post, not the comment. Look at the comment I linked. That’s my source. I don’t give a crap about the meme, but the comment is a deep dive into the source code.
Piefed is a different reddit-like software that federates with Lemmy. It's a different take on the same thing that Lemmy is providing, but still compatible with everything, so a piefed user can see and respond to your comment even if you're on Lemmy.
Piefed also has some neat features unique to it, such as:
a very nice gallery view for image heavy communities.
the ability to combine comments from multiple communities under one post, if the same link was posted to all of them. You can see an example of that here (notice how the comments have dividers for each community).
the ability to create and subscribe to a pre-made list of communities, sorta like a multi-reddit.
93 Comments
john_t@piefed.ee · 52 pts · 193d
There are dozens of us!
rimu@piefed.social · 46 pts · 193d
piefed.social's server is coping fine but I recommend new people join any other instance. Look for one with a rocket or lightning icon - https://piefed.social/auth/instance_chooser
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 15 pts · 193d
What do the rocket and lightning icons mean?
Skavau@piefed.social · 21 pts · 193d
server speed
rocket - fast lightning - medium
Zombie@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 192d
But lightning is faster than rockets... What? This doesn't make any sense at all!
ageedizzle@piefed.ca · 1 pts · 187d
turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub · 9 pts · 192d
Phew. Picked my instance based on vibes alone, but it turned out good anyway. Didn't even know about the speed ratings.
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 192d
Hm, I wouldn't have known rocket is faster, since lightning is instantaneous in real life.
Perhaps a speedometer at different speeds and color chunks (low adds first 3rd is filled green, medium adds yellow to the next 3rd, fast adds red to last chunk) would be more intuitive? Though that could also be interpreted as server capacity if the word speed isn't next to the icon. Maybe a little icon legend somewhere nearby could help, or a question mark sign next to the speed icon that explains what it is?
Skavau@piefed.social · 2 pts · 192d
Yes, probably.
Blaze@piefed.zip · 8 pts · 193d
Instance responsiveness compared to your location IIRC
squirrel@piefed.kobel.fyi · 11 pts · 193d
Or host your own on bare metal, docker or yunohost :)
ada@piefed.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 193d
tfw 99.6% uptime is only medium stability :\
rimu@piefed.social · 20 pts · 193d
It's not a technical stability we're talking about there - it's more human. Number of admins with SSH access, whether there are donations coming in, if there are daily backups.
Sorry, all this is undocumented.
ada@piefed.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 193d
I'm guessing it's because we fund our instances out of our own pockets, and donations don't cover the entire cost? If you're looking for future improvement ideas, I'd much rather that information be exposed directly, than the word "stability" which implies we have uptime issues
rimu@piefed.social · 11 pts · 193d
Yes I'd be happy to find a better word for it. Although, with low social stability eventually there will be 0% uptime so they are related.
ada@piefed.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 193d
I think that's a bit harsh. As it is, Kaity and I would both have to get hit by buses for us to lose the ability to fund our instances. We're both well in to our careers, with sufficient earning power to cover the finances. We would both have to lose our incomes for the long term, before the site itself became threatened. Long enough to ask for community funding if it came to that.
In real world terms, we've been hosting fediverse instances out of our own pocket for over 3 years now, which is a time period few fediverse instances can match, and even fewer threadiverse instances.
Which is to say, I think our social stability is pretty reasonable by fediverse standards. There absolutely are instances out there with higher levels of social stability, but that's not because they have more community funding, it's because they have more users and more admins, which also comes with requisite organisational structures that lets them run their instances without any individual admins being the point of failure.
rimu@piefed.social · 8 pts · 193d
The intent of that checkbox in the instance chooser settings is really about gauging financial stability. So for people in your position donations from users don't matter so much and you could just tick it. I'm not auditing anyone!
rimu@piefed.social · 6 pts · 193d
Yes, this isn't a personal judgement about your particular circumstances. The instance chooser embeds assumptions about what tends to happen on average. As such it can never fully represent every situation.
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 2 pts · 192d
support? backing? idk
Egonallanon@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 193d
Anything less than 5 9's of uptime indicates a lack of commitment.
Please do not ask about the uptime of my self hosted services.
ada@piefed.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 193d
Oh crap, I was aiming for 9 5's!
bibbasa@piefed.social · 36 pts · 193d
eyyy, i'm one of those. long time mastodon user, but was always intimidated by lemmy, piefed seems a lot more friendly.
Blaze@piefed.zip · 17 pts · 193d
Welcome here!
riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 192d
Joke's on you guys, I'm viewing this post from LEMMY!
texture@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 192d
friendly like community or software experience?
biltong@piefed.co.za · 29 pts · 193d
I wish there was an option for the graph to start at zero. Graphs like this can be misleading.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 10 pts · 193d
how so. 2000 to 3000 is a 50% increase. in a period of days. I mean its not like the numbers are not there and the rate of increase for the year before is like 1600 to 2000 so like 30%. for the whole year.
EkHouVanBraai@piefed.co.za · 14 pts · 193d
This is the same data, but the graph that doesn't start at zero is misleading.
The one bar looks twice as big, when it definitely isn't.
Graphs that don't start at zero can be useful, but it's nice to have the option to choose.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 5 pts · 193d
I understand that but when I see a graph that does not start at zero I can take it into account. I get you though about best practice. Usually this type of thing I think is from software defaulting to it to avoid white space. At the extreme if you have something that is at a million and goes up to 1.1 million that can be a huge jump for a particular time span but if you started at zero it would just look like a straight line.
EkHouVanBraai@piefed.co.za · 4 pts · 192d
Yea I totally get why both exist. Over long timespans starting at zero will just give you a lot of whitespace
AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth · 7 pts · 193d
If you need to read the numbers to interpret a graph it is redundant and bad visulisation.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 1 pts · 193d
TIL I read graphs badly.
AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth · 3 pts · 192d
That's not what i meant to say, taking a closer look and trying to undestand it all is obbiously good. But graphs have a big glance value and should be able to convey key information at a glance.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 1 pts · 192d
thats fair enough. I get the importance. Like this was to me easy enough to read but I know under different circumstances it can create a kind of mental gymnastics where its like, man, this should not take this much to figure out. Its not exactly the same scenario but I had a park near me put up a vertical map on the mouth of an east/west trail on the south side. The map follows the standard thing where up is north. I hit them up requesting the move the map structure to the other side of the trail because its exhausting turning everything around in your head where if it faced north everything would line up more naturally mentally.
Blaze@piefed.zip · 8 pts · 193d
Be ready for many comments mentioning that
squirrel@piefed.kobel.fyi · 4 pts · 191d
I just found out you can freely increase the number of days via the URL on fediverse.observer
https://piefed.fediverse.observer/dailystats&days=2000
Now the graph starts at 0
@HubertManne@piefed.social @EkHouVanBraai@piefed.co.za
biltong@piefed.co.za · 2 pts · 191d
That graph looks pretty good. 🚀
blackn1ght@feddit.uk · 20 pts · 193d
Where's the increase coming from? Users changing from Lemmy or new users to the theadiverse? (I fucking hate that word)
rimu@piefed.social · 25 pts · 193d
From reddit :)
recursive_recursion@piefed.ca · 14 pts · 193d
can confirmđź‘Ť
mesamunefire@piefed.social · 13 pts · 193d
Woo nice!
Blaze@piefed.zip · 9 pts · 193d
Not the biggest fan either, but nobody has better alternative. Compared to Forumverse, Threadiverse is a bit better.
Also a few threads on !fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com and !fedigrow@lemmy.zip
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 5 pts · 193d
Community-verse? Groupiverse? Topicverse? Lol
Blaze@piefed.zip · 11 pts · 193d
Exactly why Threadiverse isn't too bad xD
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 8 pts · 193d
Link-aggregator-verse
turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub · 5 pts · 192d
Yeah... That works in the context where people actually share links. Various news communities definitely fit that description, but then there are several discussion communities where links aren't the main point. Take ask lemmy or no stupid questions for example. Oh, and then there are also picture communities like superbowl.
Lumping all of them together with "link aggregator" platforms doesn't fit very well. From a historical perspective that's fine though. As far as I know, Reddit started as a link aggregator, and diversified later.
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 5 pts · 192d
yea I was just joking lol, there was recently a discussion about how join-lemmy was still saying "link aggregator" and everyone thought it was a terrible description
https://lemmy.ml/post/41719890
turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub · 3 pts · 192d
But I guess that's still technically correct, the best kind of correct. Still sounds odd, but I guess it kinda works as long as you use the term because of historical reasons.
Regardless, now that Lemmy/Piefed has become such diverse platforms, it's getting harder to nail it down into a single convenient term.
I think the defining feature of these platforms is the topic focused approach. On Mastodon, you care about the people who write whatever, while on Lemmy/Piefed, you care about a topic written by whoever.
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 192d
I don't see why it has to end in verse. Like, boardnet sounds good (in my opinion), board network, because Lemmy/piefed is a network of boards.
Coelacanth@feddit.nu · 4 pts · 192d
Maybe this is showing my age and the association will not materialize in the minds of younger people, but boardnet makes me think of a bunch of old-school phpBB message board forums.
greybeard@feddit.online · 1 pts · 192d
The forums I visited in those days was threaded, with trees to view commons. It was a proto version of the way Lemmy/Piefed/Reddit comments work, you just could only see one comment at a time. I never liked the flat style of PHPBB and the like.
Coelacanth@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 192d
Really? I don't have any memories of forums like that, only the old school flat threads with one comment at a time in chronological order.
greybeard@feddit.online · 1 pts · 192d
It wasn't a common format for sure. It was the forums for BYOND, a "game engine" specifically designed to make multiplayer games easily. You could think of it as a proto roblox.
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 192d
We used to have https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmyBB?tab=readme-ov-file
Blaze@piefed.zip · 2 pts · 192d
Boardnet, doesn't sound too bad indeed. Maybe you should post it somewhere as a suggested alternative to Threadiverse
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 2 pts · 192d
I kinda like that actually
cabbage@piefed.social · 2 pts · 192d
The social web is the grown up sounding alternative I guess.
Blaze@piefed.zip · 4 pts · 192d
People will think the social Web is existing social networks
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 192d
That also encompasses microblogs like mastodon, and bluesky.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 192d
i heard its being promoted on reddit, could be from there.
recursive_recursion@piefed.ca · 6 pts · 193d
If you hate the term threadiverse I'd happily recommend fediverse!🌻
sik0fewl@piefed.ca · 15 pts · 193d
Threadiverse is a subset of the fediverse, though.
Blaze@piefed.zip · 10 pts · 193d
You still can't follow a Mastodon user from Lemmy or Piefed. The compatibility exists but is definitely not the same level than Mbin/Piefed/Lemmy
Both words describe different concepts.
OpenStars@piefed.social · 4 pts · 192d
Nobody loves it, but fewer people including several major contributors seem to hate it than any alternative.
It might be nice if The Verse won. It won't, and it shouldn't, but it's a nice thought regardless:-).
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 192d
Please don't be bots....
ada@piefed.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 193d
Love to see it!
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 192d
Every time I hear “censorship” cried in relation to piefed, I think of the same cries with Voat, another Reddit clone/refuge. It never compromised on that.
And it turned into a (now long dead) toxic wasteland. As that ethos smothered all the interesting niche communities.
IMO, the #1 Fediverse dev priority should be UX that discourages toxicity. That’s what will keep it alive. A militantly, forcibly “unbiased” UX is a quaint old internet ideal, yet it always seems to snowball into an unsustainable toxic monoculture.
So, if piefed uses “opinionated” defaults to stave that off, good.
Blaze@piefed.zip · 4 pts · 192d
Thank you
Complexicate@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 192d
It's a good example of the Paradox of Tolerance:
"if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance"
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 192d
Let’s see if piefed is as open as it claims to be. The creator and maintainer actually injects their own opinion into the source code. There are so many deny lists and a social score built into the system.
Piefed is great at putting in new features and making everything pretty. But it’s so opinionated, you’re better off on Reddit, imo.
Source: https://lemmy.ml/comment/23662293
Skavau@piefed.social · 15 pts · 192d
Almost all of these are able to be turned off.
By "social credit" you just mean a toned down version of Reddits karma (that doesn't track positive score)?
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 192d
No, like posting a gif leads you to have -1 social score, hidden, because you posted a gif. There’s so many opinions in the code.
Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.fr · 3 pts · 192d
You have point but on the other side, its goal is to avoid karma farming and help mods, admins for creating a serene place for discussion.
There is two distinct score : reputation, attitude.
When we post a gif, and everyone laugh, it's easy to get a good reputation whereas elsewhere, i might post several terrible comments. That's why posting gif doesn't credit you reputation. You can't use gif to bypass bad comment and get a good reputation.
That's why it works like that.
IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 192d
Personally I'm fine with a comment getting removed if all they replied with is "this." Sure that's opinionated, but it's a good opinion.
Skavau@piefed.social · 8 pts · 192d
It can be turned off anyway, most of the others do turn it off.
Ofiuco@piefed.ca · 6 pts · 192d
Blaze@piefed.zip · 4 pts · 192d
https://piefed.zip/c/fediverse/p/1005977/piefed-admin-settings-that-allow-to-enable-or-disable-content-filters-they-are-disabled-by#post_replies
Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.fr · 3 pts · 192d
I'm now intervening as a mod. The povokative passive-aggressive tone you used is a big no.
Please, can you edit your comment and just tell us that you disagree with the score system and remove your source and reddit part ?
Maybe you wanted to see your post removed for proving your point even futher as "See ? Piefed's staff censorship ideas they doesn't agree."
I went to the your gif and read comments : you won't see that kind of content here. I also asked users to edit their comment, here, when they critized lemmy and i expect you to do the same.
Yes, i disagree with lemmy dev's political opinions but that's not the main reason we enjoy Piefed. And when Nutomic asked me to share lemmy contact and documentation in iceshrimp dev's channel, i helped him. :)
Let's go back to your post :
You can disagree with the score system, the no federated vote...and explain your point, why this and that...but not the way you did.
So please edit your comment and remove those above part
Users can choose what they prefer :
And i'm happy for them they can choose their favorite pie. If you prefer Lemmy, that's great. :)
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 192d
I cannot use a tone via text easily: see Poe’s law. It was meant to be informative and sort of speculative to the future of Piefed. I was happy when Piefed came around but this changed my view a little. I want all federation to succeed but having these things be embedded in the code and not flags to set (even though you can turn most off) just strikes me as concerning. I’m glad users have choices though, but we will still call out bad choices, as many do when calling out shitty instances like hexbear or .ml.
I will not remove the source and my opinion on it. I’ve been nothing but civil and understanding in the replies to my post and it’s clear it’s an opinion with using “imo”.
Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.fr · 2 pts · 190d
Your "source" is not a source of information : It is a meme. It doesn't create the conditions for discussion and debate. A meme doesn't invite people to share their thinking, people react.
That's quite different from someone explaining that Piefed has a set of rules that rate our behaviour. The mood and reaction is quite different from there. Do you notice it ?
No, i'm not asking you to remove your opinion that you disagree with piefed score. I never told you that. I'm asking you to rewrite your post and create a proper space for discussion. And i explained why above...
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 190d
I have already had a proper space for discussion. I’ve been civil in the replies. This is crazy to even be arguing about. If it’s a meme, why do you care? Are we to just discuss and bicker on the internet or create a better space?
Remove it if you want for not conforming to your rules of speech. I’m done.
Flames5123@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 190d
Oh I see your issue. You thought I was linking the meme post, not the comment. Look at the comment I linked. That’s my source. I don’t give a crap about the meme, but the comment is a deep dive into the source code.
Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 190d
Piefed is clearly an honeypot, you need to have severe brain injury to not understand it.
“ah…i cant wait to have my hidden social score, let’s join this unknown pit of shite.” -not a cop
Skavau@piefed.social · 1 pts · 190d
Honeypot to what, exactly?
October1@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 193d
Wtf is piefed
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net · 27 pts · 193d
Piefed is a different reddit-like software that federates with Lemmy. It's a different take on the same thing that Lemmy is providing, but still compatible with everything, so a piefed user can see and respond to your comment even if you're on Lemmy.
Piefed also has some neat features unique to it, such as:
core@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 192d
lemmy with extra censorship tools
mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 192d
anti-tankie lemmy
njm1314@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 191d
And by tankie you mean anything to the left of neoliberals.
mesamunefire@piefed.social · 8 pts · 193d
🥰
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 7 pts · 193d
Love how that looks like a screwy-faced smiley from a distance.
apftwb@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 192d
I sure hope these are users and not bots...
Skavau@piefed.social · 5 pts · 192d
It's from a few promotional posts on Reddit, so it's users.
w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 192d
But...there's no pie!!!