If you got bored by Fedora is probably the right choice for you. Otherwise nothing compares to Arch, esp if you "I’m still learning and only know some basics, but I want to go deeper and really understand how things work under the hood.". Another safer-nobrainer is Tumbleweed.
It is the gold standard.
Your opinion is outdated.
Void Linux doesn't use systemd.
Alacritty, one of the first rust based terminals. Fast, simple config. Had no problems. Foot as a second if you want an alternative.
Love this guys, hope he lives forever!
If you got bored by Fedora is probably the right choice for you. Otherwise nothing compares to Arch, esp if you "I’m still learning and only know some basics, but I want to go deeper and really understand how things work under the hood.". Another safer-nobrainer is Tumbleweed.
Using a filesystem which has NONE of modern features because you "noticed" performance tradeoffs...
Encryption in btrfs? https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Btrfs#Encryption
Nice combination, using something similar on my laptop. Check yazi as a filemanager.
yikes
Ditch Debian. FreeBSD has the current version...
Its not about liking, its about how people use it and what for. AUR shouldn't be used willynillyngly.
Which model?
I agree, AUR and pacman (syntax) suck. Apart from that Arch is one of the best.
You misstyped fish.
Upvote for acknowledging this blatant flaw while working on everything else KDE does at the moment.
Keeping away from sudo, got it.
So why would somebody run that on their homeserver compared to tried and true staples with tons of documentation? 🍿
Running exotic niche server images out in the wild...
Wait your previous comment was not sarcastic? 😱