If you’re branching logic due to the existence or non-existence of a field rather than the value of a field (or treating undefined different from null), I’m going to say you’re the one doing something wrong, not the Java dev.
These two things SHOULD be treated the same by anybody in most cases, with the possible exception of rejecting the later due to schema mismatch (i.e. when a “name” field should never be defined, regardless of the value).
That’s an embarrassingly small number of games for a PC… a PC should have access to far more games than that.
I’m sure that’s just the “verified” games, but it’s pretty dumb to flaunt it like it’s something impressive.
Sure, just like the “leakers” guessed it would come out last year, and the year before that, and the year before that… don’t worry, just keep moving that goalpost, you’ll get it right one day.
Yeah, this time the “leaks” are “different”, just like they were “different” last time, and the time before that, and the time before that, and…
What this shows is how terrible raw JS is, when all of this crap is required to fix all of the edge cases and make things actually work the way it’s supposed to.
In other words, this is just them saying “shut up, we already knew and we’re not doing anything about it” to all the people that don’t know anything about copyrights that keep spamming them.
If you’re branching logic due to the existence or non-existence of a field rather than the value of a field (or treating undefined different from null), I’m going to say you’re the one doing something wrong, not the Java dev.
These two things SHOULD be treated the same by anybody in most cases, with the possible exception of rejecting the later due to schema mismatch (i.e. when a “name” field should never be defined, regardless of the value).
You wish it was like that in the medical industry, but it absolutely is not
Buy a keyboard and monitor
NGL, this looks kinda terrible
And the only thing even worse than SCRUM is literally every other option
I just used it in the US last month, it definitely is.
Kinda dumb to do that when they already repair them for free (including shipping) with < 1 week turnaround.
That’s an embarrassingly small number of games for a PC… a PC should have access to far more games than that. I’m sure that’s just the “verified” games, but it’s pretty dumb to flaunt it like it’s something impressive.
No, that’s not how that works.
Users can generate their own keys, and you know it’s the same user as long as they have the same key, even if they’re on different servers.
No certificate authority is required for this kind of use case.
Remote Desktop
If they ask the SAME question and you score still goes DOWN I’m gonna go ahead and call that “a bad sign”.
Sure, just like the “leakers” guessed it would come out last year, and the year before that, and the year before that… don’t worry, just keep moving that goalpost, you’ll get it right one day.
Yeah, this time the “leaks” are “different”, just like they were “different” last time, and the time before that, and the time before that, and…
What this shows is how terrible raw JS is, when all of this crap is required to fix all of the edge cases and make things actually work the way it’s supposed to.
Oddsparks
Dyson Sphere Program
I will leave a negative review on any game without full keybind support.
Maybe one day devs (especially Japanese ones) will understand that this is the bare MINIMUM for accessibility.
You should never write a single line of code at any point in the development of a game that involves hard-coding a key input.
Only most of a decade too late
Like a cartoon villain twiddling their mustache thinking of more ways to be evil?
We should be giving even more respect to the ones that kept their own salary reasonable in the first place so that a pay cut wasn’t necessary.
In other words, this is just them saying “shut up, we already knew and we’re not doing anything about it” to all the people that don’t know anything about copyrights that keep spamming them.
And there’s nothing wrong with that