excursion22

u/excursion22@piefed.ca
6 posts · 177 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

on What do we think? · c/degoogle · 1 pts · 19h

Basically Organic Maps' private owners planned to commercialize and make components of the application closed source. Very much not in the Open Source spirit that had been touted, for which many external contributors donated their time. So, those who actually gave a shit about being open source forked the project into CoMaps. That is why the two apps very much look the same, because they more or less are, aside from the intentions of their developers.

I run many of the usual suspects, but I would say Home Assistant is on the top of the list.

  • Integrates with seemingly endless smart home devices
  • Make automations that make your house seem like magic
  • Make it look just how you want it to
  • and best of all, it costs numerous hours of tinkering nothing!

I'm well aware of how heat pumps work. What I meant by that was that some electrical grids, like Saskatchewan, for example, have a high GHG intensity. So, despite a heat pump's high efficiency, it can still result in higher overall GHG emissions than if the same amount of heat were delivered by burning natural gas in a condensing furnace.

Now Saskatchewan has been making good progress on cleaning up their grid, so it might not quite be the case now, but energy and GHG modelling I did a couple years ago showed just the case above.

Heat pumps aren't a very effective solution. Depending on generation source, the electricity a heat pump uses to heat could be dirtier than the fuel that would otherwise be burned.

A better solution is to first reduce demand. For existing buildings, start with improving airtightness and reducing summer solar gain (add shading), then insulate where practical (following good building science), and only after that, modify mechanical systems to suit the new, reduced demand. New buildings take the same approach.

It's not so different from professional exams in Canada/Untied States. Applicants with some wealth to put into a tutor are often more successful, while also requiring a not insignificant fee to write the exam, effectively gatekeeping professional colleges from the less well-off.

E: to clear up some confusion...there is a fee paid by the person taking/writing/being assessed by the exam. Apparently the meaning 'to write' an exam is not consistent, but I intended the Canadian/British English meaning.

Anecdotal, but I've been using Fauxx for a month or two and have noticed that ads I see (those few that manage to get through my blockers) are more generic, don't apply to my demographic, or are even in a language I don't speak.

I do practice basic data privacy, but I think that data poisoning also has a positive impact in obscuring your digital footprint. There will always be data from when I was less privacy-minded, so I feel it'll be more effective to both create a vacuum and fill that void with junk data.

PPL minimum in Canada is 45 flight hours and it's common for students to solo in 10. "Full license" also doesn't really mean anything. There's a recreational pilot permit, private pilot license, and commercial pilot license, with various ratings/endorsements among those.

An Argentinian PPL is likely different, given the article's mention of the pilot needing to still build time with an instructor. Though, it could've been a rental checkout of some sort.