faint_marble_noise

u/faint_marble_noise@programming.dev
0 posts · 27 comments

Recent posts

No posts.

Recent comments

Imagine pesticides, radioactive substances, or highly toxic chemicals would have been introduced in such a manner.

Sadly, there is no need to imagine. There is no limit to people's greed. And guardrails are only installed after there is no way to hide damage done.

For every women who gets a female driver there will be one, who don't. The only beneficiary of this change is Uber, they got positive publicity from delusional people unable to add 2 and 2. With regard to your point, I do not see a good solution in general, but adding more of it certainly does not help.

I still have win on my laptop, but I barely use it. I decided to install CachyOS on my new desktop, and it works better than I expected) Still have some problems, though, and they mostly come down to my reluctance to do research. Here are the main ones: My azeron is not supported. There is antimicrox program recomended to map inputs, and it worked first time I configured it. But then I decided to change it a little, and changes will not apply, keeping my first configuration. After I leave computer unattended for several minutes, it won't properly wake up. Strangely, it wakes up normally if I send it to sleep manually. Some programs (mainly Steam). Take unexpectedly long to startup after boot. What is worse, window system completely freezes while it starts up, the experience I last had with Windows))

Anyway, I'm happy and not going back

The narrative is a little more nuanced and is being built slowly to be more believable and less obvious. They are trying to convince everybody that AI is powerful technology, which means that it is worth to develop, but also comes with serious risks. Therefore, only established corps with experience and processes in AI development can handle it. Regulation abd certification follows, making it almost impossible for startups and OSS to enter the scene and compete.

Doesn't look like Vacnet solves anything. Not even wall-hacks. I'm not defending kernel level anticheats btw. I'm argueing that dismissive comments like "devs are lazy" do not have real world basis. It is possible that comprehensive anti cheat is an unsolvable problem. Trust based solutions may be the right way, but in the form of peers trusting each other, as opposed to third party having obscure trust to participants system.

All of those things are already computed on server. The purpouse of anti cheat is to not let computer to game for you. To not precisely click heads, step out of danger within 1ms of seeing it or reliably hit timings and combos. Such things can be hard to detect, and it is an ongoing battle between detectors and cheats. And ordinary people are on the loosing side, as they face forced kernel rootkits, false cheat detections and grace periods during which cheaters are still allowed to play.