i'm opposed to keeping any president at all. i'm opposed to the senate conducting any business. you can't think the people who were at j6 thought they were pulling an insurrection. at least, i don't believe that.
These are not my “pet definitions” but accepted definitions of what a dictator/dictatorship is in the political sphere. It’s called context.
can you substantiate this claim, that governing by dictate is not an accepted definition"in the political sphere". while we're on it, what do you define as "the political sphere"?
That’s not what a dictatorship is. A dictatorship is where one person (the dictator) has almost complete control over the government with few, if any, restrictions.
they are literally creating policy by dictate. your pet definition seems crafted to exclude this obvious use of dictate.
this isn't a quote. it's just libel.
i don't name-call. i don't post misinformation. i comply with tos.
erroneously removed comments
i'm opposed to keeping any president at all. i'm opposed to the senate conducting any business. you can't think the people who were at j6 thought they were pulling an insurrection. at least, i don't believe that.
i've seen explications before, but i'm open to the possibility that you have a novel theory that is testable, falsifiable, and valid.
can you substantiate this claim, that governing by dictate is not an accepted definition"in the political sphere". while we're on it, what do you define as "the political sphere"?
i think he's a dummy, and he may be operating on my folksy definition of "dictator". my assumption is just as valid as yours.
so it's dumb to say it that way, but i don't believe he ever said he's planning to "end democracy" or even meant to imply that.
no, they're not. calling your storytelling "math" doesn't change its veracity.
it's a problem on .world, too, including their matrix instance.
they are literally creating policy by dictate. your pet definition seems crafted to exclude this obvious use of dictate.