No, work done only cares about the start and the end. What happened in-between doesn't matter.
In this case, the kinetic energy is 0 at the start and end, but the potential energy of the mass increased by mgh. 5 kg * 9.81 m/s^2^ * 2 m = 98.1 J (1 J = 1 N•m).
It's not as easy as applying work = force * sloped distance, since she's not simply accelerating the mass. If she did, it would have horizontal kinetic energy at the end. She's stopping it too (well, the friction is stopping it, but we're ignoring friction).
10x probe with 2v per division setting only showing 9.81V
The scope is clipping (limiting the voltage to protect the internal ADC). Notice CH1 in the bottom left is red. You can fix this by increasing the voltage scale
The OpenHantek6022 manual describes the limits of each voltage scale setting
Edit: I have exactly the same scope. If you need any help, you can reach out to me
There are plenty of ways to sandbox it. Treat it as an employee, i.e. give it its own user account, use cgroups, API tokens with custom permissions, etc. Unfortunately, the defaults aren't very secure. And I'm sure most users will just stick with the defaults
That's true for any conversation that isn't a DM, though. All popular search engines let you enter a string in quotes and find pages that matches exactly. But if someone wanted to make fun of me on the internet, I would prefer if they censored my name.
I chose Xamarin in the early days of Bitwarden because it was a technology that I was proficient at (.NET and C#) and it afforded me the time to maintain a mobile app along with all the other apps I was building for Bitwarden. Xamarin is a real time saver, for sure and it has served us well over the past 8 years, but it comes with some downsides as well: ...
OP specifically asked about the sloped distance:
No, work done only cares about the start and the end. What happened in-between doesn't matter.
In this case, the kinetic energy is 0 at the start and end, but the potential energy of the mass increased by mgh. 5 kg * 9.81 m/s^2^ * 2 m = 98.1 J (1 J = 1 N•m).
It's not as easy as applying work = force * sloped distance, since she's not simply accelerating the mass. If she did, it would have horizontal kinetic energy at the end. She's stopping it too (well, the friction is stopping it, but we're ignoring friction).
The scope is clipping (limiting the voltage to protect the internal ADC). Notice CH1 in the bottom left is red. You can fix this by increasing the voltage scale
The OpenHantek6022 manual describes the limits of each voltage scale setting
Edit: I have exactly the same scope. If you need any help, you can reach out to me
Isn't that what the downvote button is for?
Yes, you can do chores: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Maintenance
There are plenty of ways to sandbox it. Treat it as an employee, i.e. give it its own user account, use cgroups, API tokens with custom permissions, etc. Unfortunately, the defaults aren't very secure. And I'm sure most users will just stick with the defaults
Pretty sure this will only affect 3D printing businesses. It will be very hard to enforce for individuals
Nano has one of the lightest nodes, making it quite eco friendly. And Atto's node can run on a 1 GB VPS (the minimum requirements are here)
Nano, Atto and a few other payment-focused coins
What's worse is that there are modern alternatives that can process hundreds of transactions per second without any mining at all
But Bitcoin people don't care about that because they don't use Bitcoin for actual payments, they use the price to pump their bags
I like to think that he forgets, keeps trying and then makes a new post about it
How dare you not close your trololo's
Ad hominem dodging of the question. Classic.
That's true for any conversation that isn't a DM, though. All popular search engines let you enter a string in quotes and find pages that matches exactly. But if someone wanted to make fun of me on the internet, I would prefer if they censored my name.
The monthly pet rent is outrageous
We all checked.
Workers are just obstacles to their labour
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/42/how-can-i-use-a-vertical-space-between-paragraphs-rather-than-indentation