hmn

u/hmn@lemmy.staphup.nl
83 posts · 14 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

Hi there,

i'm quite new to all of this, but i found this guy who has soem interesting info regarding grouding/coupling in designs.

Because you said any help is appreciated, maybe you're interested. Basically Hans Rosenberg has a 4 part yt lecture as a teaser to his free 9 part minicourse. His free minicourse is "Module 1" of his paid full course.

In his 4 part teaser he also throws in an example for digital signals

  • For CCTV alike stuff you could consider https://lavrsen.dk/foswiki/bin/view/Motion/MotionGuideInstallation . it runs on RaspberryPI as well.
  • For a baby-cam (Not exactly what you're looking for)
    • i use a Raspberry pi 4,
      • running Jami.net - p2p softphone, open source, run on any device, no central server, no centrally stored credentials. Enabled auto-pick-up on it.
      • connected a selfy-webcam. The white leds i replaced with IR leds, and removed the IR-filter from the lens, to achieve active night-vision.
    • connect to it using Jami on my Laptop, or mobile from anywhere

The CDC did a study and from that, they claimed the rate was 0.001%, or one out of 100,000. (Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538893/#:~:text=In%20this%20study%2C%20the%20incidence,two%20doses%20of%20the%20vaccine. )

2.8% is a lot higher than 0.001%. Another 0.3% had “probable myocarditis,” putting the total at over 3%. That is 3000 times higher than the US government claimed

In this small study, nobody had serious complications, but with a myocarditis complication rate of 3%, you would have to expect that giving out hundreds of millions of doses is a pretty risky proposition.

One oddity was that the rate of myocarditis among the participants was heavily weighted toward women, not men. That could be an artifact of the sample, or it could indicate that women are more likely to get a complication, but the complications are more likely to be serious among men.

(source)

imo, There's too many "probably"s in your reply

im thinking; if they were so concerned about safety, they should also not start prescribing asperin from the getgo, for the same reasons they banned ivermectin, not knowing how the body would react. (Remember ivermectin safety is also already documented since 1970)

Actually, asperin is imo also contraversial, as scientific literature can't come to a single conclusion. one of those studies warning against using asperin