TechCrunch has that article tagged as "evergreens", which I think is their code for "we can probably get away with reposting this later and pretending it's brand new."
TechCrunch has that article tagged as "evergreens", which I think is their code for "we can probably get away with reposting this later and pretending it's brand new."
Spanish investigators have confirmed that the Russian cargo vessel Ursa Major, which sank off the coast of Cartagena in December 2024, was carrying undeclared nuclear reactor components likely bound for North Korea.
According to La Verdad, the ship was part of Russia’s shadow fleet and took an unusual route from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok through the Mediterranean.
Though the ship’s manifest listed only empty containers and port equipment, aerial images revealed two large, undeclared containers at the stern. Authorities later identified them as housings for VM-4SG nuclear reactors.
What does a housing for a nuclear reactor look like?
They linked it because of the reason Volkswagen was selling the factory.
You either didn't read the article (I get it, it's paywalled) or you're intentionally misrepresenting the link.
Either one makes your argument look bad.
::: spoiler Transcript of the article
Volkswagen VOW3 -0.38% has sold a car plant in China’s Xinjiang region that has drawn scrutiny over alleged human-rights abuses.
The Urumqi site, which is owned by a joint venture between VW and local partner SAIC Motor 600104 -0.32%, has been a source of controversy in recent years because of China’s alleged persecution of Uyghur minorities in the Xinjiang region.
:::
TOKYO: A man was arrested after stabbing eight people and injuring seven others with what was believed to be bleach at a rubber factory in central Japan on Friday (Dec 26), officials said.
What did Susan do to deserve that?
Grok | XCancel
TechCrunch has that article tagged as "evergreens", which I think is their code for "we can probably get away with reposting this later and pretending it's brand new."
Case in point, this article was published in 2023.
Me, too. I don't know why. I assume TechCrunch deleted the 2003 article, but that shouldn't impact a snapshot.
TechCrunch has that article tagged as "evergreens", which I think is their code for "we can probably get away with reposting this later and pretending it's brand new."
Case in point, this article was published in 2023.
The subtitle does not give confidence that the author knows wtf they're talking about.
College Humor had it right. (Catbox alt)
I'm calling Sir Bravas. (Catbox alt)
But enough about that.
VOXI(?) | XCancel | Catbox
CEO: Yes, Mr. Jackson, I am the CEO! Please stop cursing.
What does a housing for a nuclear reactor look like?
They linked it because of the reason Volkswagen was selling the factory.
You either didn't read the article (I get it, it's paywalled) or you're intentionally misrepresenting the link.
Either one makes your argument look bad.
::: spoiler Transcript of the article
Volkswagen VOW3 -0.38% has sold a car plant in China’s Xinjiang region that has drawn scrutiny over alleged human-rights abuses.
The Urumqi site, which is owned by a joint venture between VW and local partner SAIC Motor 600104 -0.32%, has been a source of controversy in recent years because of China’s alleged persecution of Uyghur minorities in the Xinjiang region. :::
Something wrong with that link
No, like this:
inaspacefront
Curious to find out the backstory.
There's not really an article.
Turning Point OU tweeted screenshots of the assignment, the essay, and the professors' responses.
I transcribed them in the OP under spoiler accordions, to make them easier to read and so you're not blasted with the whole thing all at once.
I love this thread. It's like a quick list for who to block.
I used to have narcissism, but then I helped myself out of it.
I did such an amazing job (the best job, in fact) that I don't have it anymore.
They also got the student's last name wrong for some reason.
Might check out GRIME or Blasphemous.