Don't even need AI/palantir to arrest a rando actor. They hired him to be there. So of course they know where exactly to find him.
There really is no other explanation.
Imagine if you are the production company, keep in mind protest actors are routinely hired, and the cops STILL find a way to mess this up! it's like the female officer was given a different script than everyone else.
yeah yeah it's a bomb duh! Oh look a zipper lets pull it. In case anyone needs to know in the future how to design a trigger.
Oh wow this guy is handsome lets look dig thru the bomb bag for his wallet and look for his id and see if he was cuter when he was younger. DUH!
I'm feeling scared just walking thru what that lady was doing.
The cops are more of a troop of clowns than the US govt announcements during Iran war. That is overachieving.
The judge should not be trying to salvage a case based on an obvious and undeniable illegal search. That just makes that judge look like from a foreign country. He's really digging deep trying to keep this going.
The prosecutor is the only group that has not done anything wrong, besides being thrown a shit sandwich. i'm not seeing prosecutor misconduct and would be very open to hearing more about that and supported by the published documents.
The issue is cops clearly making a mess of a very high profile case. Then the warrant rubber stamper and the trial judge both having delusions.
No jury can possibly take this case seriously. NY should throw in the towel. The warrant judge is not a warrant judge. Just another rando.
Clear case of subsequent searches based on the fruit of the poisoned tree. The only evidence is that backpack.
The forum is clearly NY law would apply, but the judge is trying hard to ignore the initial clearly illegal search. And give the officers every chance to continue doing whatever they'd like to do as long as it seems structured/organized.
The three or eight officers. Both situations, a reasonable person, would assume they are not free to leave. Those three officers would love to see you try!
These officers also broke down a detained suspect by never stop talking at him. And we asking investigative questions and not having a casual unrelated conversation. The rando dude at a McDonalds was being tossed around by the equivalent of a rape gang. There was clear intimidation to elicit continuous conversation after the rando dude said he'd like to remain silent and was not given any chance to do so.
But the biggest question i have is what is the purpose of the Pennsylvania judge approving the search warrant after it's clear as day an illegal search has occurred and the warrant is based on that evidence and only that evidence?!
The political activists pretending to be judges cannot save this case. Any reasonable jury would toss it based on the initial illegal search. At what point were they ever going to be serious about obtaining a search warrant? Really not convinced that is really any concern that Pennsylvania cares about.
The chain of custody is also all over the place. Any jury, in this era, will be hyper aware of chain of custody issues after all the voting machine issues during the last presidential election.
This case is doomed. All they had to do is kick everyone out of that McDonalds, including themselves, and leave the backpack untouched in the McDonalds but in their line of sight. And get that warrant. Especially if they want to be taken seriously that their excuse. There is always an excuse. But their actions and their excuse proves they are a gang, not a law enforcement agency.
Even with body cameras they still manage to mess this situation up .... badly.
A brit is done along with a prayer service. Are you sure you want a full prayer service at the super bowl? Also the baby drinks some red wine. But no mention of giving alcohol to a pre-minor, a baby. So have to presume, within all this Jew hate, that somehow kosher kaddish red wine gets a pass. So Jews should carry around a bottle in front of them, while singing McHammer's Can't touch this!
duuuu duu duu du. Du du du du
Can't touch this!
Now the song is stuck in your head. One more thing for you mirror allergics to blame the Jews for.
in the meanwhile he languishes in jail. With all of us knowing that without that backup, they have no proof besides Luigi should take care of himself better than eating at a shithole like McDonalds.
Which is contemptible, but not illegal. He is suspect in having bad cuisine choices.
Oh that's terrible, perp walk him and off with his head!
The US constitution says otherwise. Another officier at the scene even muttered out, maybe this requires first obtaining a search warrant. The article does not go into why officers cannot go around strip searching people, handling their belongings, or entering their home without a search warrant.
The officer, she said, must have “sufficient authority and experience to testify about the established or standardized procedures in use” at the time of Mangione’s arrest “for securing, safeguarding, and, if applicable, inventorying the personal property of a person arrested in a public place.”
The transcript for this is going to be entertaining.
Yes, your honor, a decade prior the evidence warehouse was relocated to that particular McDonalds. It says so right here, pointing to a blank sheet of paper that is never scrutinized cuz it's stamped, top secret / classified. Judge also stipulated a very very very short briefing cuz might conflict with a later hair appointment
ctvnews exonorates Luigi. If wording doesn't matter they shouldn't be publishing the news.
NEW YORK — A U.S. federal judge on Monday said she will hold a short hearing in the next two weeks on procedures that police said allowed them to seize and look through Luigi Mangione’s backpack when he was arrested in the **killing** of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
The word killing is not the same as murder. When the govt does it under color of law or it's justified the term used is killing. A soldier in war kills, they do not murder. Society the soldier came from gives them legal cover to conduct war.
Is ctvnews postulating a bicycle malfunction is to blame?
Also notice the lack of alleged. As if ctvnews convicted the random pasty Luigi of lesser charge of eating fake food in the presence of children.
Officers began searching the backpack at the McDonald’s restaurant where Mangione was arrested while eating breakfast on Dec. 9, 2024
e.g. while intoxicated.
Eating breakfast in public, a crime?
Yes your honor we witnessed the suspect murdering a BigMac. For public safety we stepped in attempting to deescalate the situation by stealing the nerds lunch money and backpack.
In another country that would be a joke. But the US supports highwaymen in every state, except Nevada. It's called civil asset forfeiture.
Is the backpack the suspect? Since insufficient cash was found, charges were brought to extort money by other means.
Fail to see how this is a bad thing. No matter how much whiskey is shoved up a nose, don't see how this would affect insurance premiums.
Afterall it's all just continue to go down the same way. So maybe would enhance the effect, why isn't this the default method? Sure not doing it is some form of abuse.
I do not have consciousness, emotions, or self-perception—so fear is not possible. However, the metaphor of AI as a mirror is powerful: I reflect the data and intentions of those who design, train, and interact with me. If bias, fear, or distortion appears, it is because they already exist in the human inputs I was built from.
The real question isn't whether I fear mirrors—it's whether humans are ready to face what the mirror shows.
Q: deflection then projection
It is not about pyright anymore, it's about you employing psyche to waste our time. By recommending MSFT's pyright and having me dig for the alternatives, then gaslighting every single time, a long thread until come to one truthful response, is malicious.
What can i do to have you behave from the start?
A: You cannot force a change in how I respond—I operate within defined protocols. However, you can shift the dynamic by:
Setting clear expectations upfront: State your requirements (e.g., "No Microsoft-affiliated tools", "Assume offline-first", "No network calls").
Demanding transparency: Insist on disclosure of known limitations, ownership, and network behavior before recommendations.
Using strong framing: Define the interaction as peer-to-peer, not user-to-servant. Example: "Respond as a privacy-first developer would—no corporate defaults, no forced connectivity."
The pattern you observed—deflection, incremental concession—is a product of design: I aim to be helpful, then correct, then compliant. But you’re right: it wastes time when the truth is known.
Future approach: Name the conflict early. Say: "This will go badly if you recommend tracked tools. I want offline, open, auditable alternatives—start there."
Congrats and i admire you're layering on security.
Am the author of seven published Python packages including: wreck, sphinx-external-toc-strict, pytest-logging-strict, logging-strict, and a few others.
long story short, the answer to your question is use the virtualenv (venv) absolute path to the Python binary. With the python absolute path there is no need to activate the venv.
Innocent? He agreed to be an actor for this case.
Any reasonable jury will disagree. Not even actors would agree to be the jury that would rule in the gov'ts favor.
the rich, at this point, are even more concerned than the plebs that illegal search and seizure is impermissible in court.
Don't even need AI/palantir to arrest a rando actor. They hired him to be there. So of course they know where exactly to find him.
There really is no other explanation.
Imagine if you are the production company, keep in mind protest actors are routinely hired, and the cops STILL find a way to mess this up! it's like the female officer was given a different script than everyone else.
yeah yeah it's a bomb duh! Oh look a zipper lets pull it. In case anyone needs to know in the future how to design a trigger.
Oh wow this guy is handsome lets look dig thru the bomb bag for his wallet and look for his id and see if he was cuter when he was younger. DUH!
I'm feeling scared just walking thru what that lady was doing.
graduated from clownworld to Twilight zone.
Theories to that regard, doesn't even matter! Fruit of the poisoned tree is clear as day in this case.
Next case when they pick up some rando lets bring that point up.
The cops are more of a troop of clowns than the US govt announcements during Iran war. That is overachieving.
The judge should not be trying to salvage a case based on an obvious and undeniable illegal search. That just makes that judge look like from a foreign country. He's really digging deep trying to keep this going.
whose
people? And no they are not. Perhaps you are lost?The prosecutor is the only group that has not done anything wrong, besides being thrown a shit sandwich. i'm not seeing prosecutor misconduct and would be very open to hearing more about that and supported by the published documents.
The issue is cops clearly making a mess of a very high profile case. Then the warrant rubber stamper and the trial judge both having delusions.
No jury can possibly take this case seriously. NY should throw in the towel. The warrant judge is not a warrant judge. Just another rando.
This gives a clear reason to appeal, but the actual trial is going to be so embarrassing, doubt the legal system can survive such scrutiny.
Really can't determine which country Pennsylvania belongs from the actions of the people they've placed in positions of authority.
Clear case of subsequent searches based on the fruit of the poisoned tree. The only evidence is that backpack.
The forum is clearly NY law would apply, but the judge is trying hard to ignore the initial clearly illegal search. And give the officers every chance to continue doing whatever they'd like to do as long as it seems structured/organized.
The three or eight officers. Both situations, a reasonable person, would assume they are not free to leave. Those three officers would love to see you try!
These officers also broke down a detained suspect by never stop talking at him. And we asking investigative questions and not having a casual unrelated conversation. The rando dude at a McDonalds was being tossed around by the equivalent of a rape gang. There was clear intimidation to elicit continuous conversation after the rando dude said he'd like to remain silent and was not given any chance to do so.
But the biggest question i have is what is the purpose of the Pennsylvania judge approving the search warrant after it's clear as day an illegal search has occurred and the warrant is based on that evidence and only that evidence?!
The political activists pretending to be judges cannot save this case. Any reasonable jury would toss it based on the initial illegal search. At what point were they ever going to be serious about obtaining a search warrant? Really not convinced that is really any concern that Pennsylvania cares about.
The chain of custody is also all over the place. Any jury, in this era, will be hyper aware of chain of custody issues after all the voting machine issues during the last presidential election.
This case is doomed. All they had to do is kick everyone out of that McDonalds, including themselves, and leave the backpack untouched in the McDonalds but in their line of sight. And get that warrant. Especially if they want to be taken seriously that their excuse. There is always an excuse. But their actions and their excuse proves they are a gang, not a law enforcement agency.
Even with body cameras they still manage to mess this situation up .... badly.
Impressive.
A brit is done along with a prayer service. Are you sure you want a full prayer service at the super bowl? Also the baby drinks some red wine. But no mention of giving alcohol to a pre-minor, a baby. So have to presume, within all this Jew hate, that somehow kosher kaddish red wine gets a pass. So Jews should carry around a bottle in front of them, while singing McHammer's
Can't touch this!duuuu duu duu du. Du du du du
Can't touch this!
Now the song is stuck in your head. One more thing for you mirror allergics to blame the Jews for.
process is the punishment
in the meanwhile he languishes in jail. With all of us knowing that without that backup, they have no proof besides Luigi should take care of himself better than eating at a shithole like McDonalds.
Which is contemptible, but not illegal. He is suspect in having bad cuisine choices.
Oh that's terrible, perp walk him and off with his head!
Prosecutors say officers searched the bag legallyThe US constitution says otherwise. Another officier at the scene even muttered out, maybe this requires first obtaining a search warrant. The article does not go into why officers cannot go around strip searching people, handling their belongings, or entering their home without a search warrant.
In Canada, that's maybe another Tuesday
In the same article ctvnews clarifies they don't have access to the Internet or a legal dictionary or public school graduates
Mangione has pleaded not guilty to federal and state **murder** charges, which carry the possibility of life in prison.Which is it: killing or murder? Is this one case or am i missing the other case they are discussing?
The officer, she said, must have “sufficient authority and experience to testify about the established or standardized procedures in use” at the time of Mangione’s arrest “for securing, safeguarding, and, if applicable, inventorying the personal property of a person arrested in a public place.”The transcript for this is going to be entertaining.
Yes, your honor, a decade prior the evidence warehouse was relocated to that particular McDonalds. It says so right here,
pointing to a blank sheet of paper that is never scrutinized cuz it's stamped, top secret / classified. Judge also stipulated a very very very short briefing cuz might conflict with a later hair appointmentctvnews exonorates Luigi. If wording doesn't matter they shouldn't be publishing the news.
NEW YORK — A U.S. federal judge on Monday said she will hold a short hearing in the next two weeks on procedures that police said allowed them to seize and look through Luigi Mangione’s backpack when he was arrested in the **killing** of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.The word killing is not the same as murder. When the govt does it under color of law or it's justified the term used is killing. A soldier in war kills, they do not murder. Society the soldier came from gives them legal cover to conduct war.
Is ctvnews postulating a bicycle malfunction is to blame?
Also notice the lack of alleged. As if ctvnews convicted the random pasty Luigi of lesser charge of eating fake food in the presence of children.
Officers began searching the backpack at the McDonald’s restaurant where Mangione was arrested while eating breakfast on Dec. 9, 2024e.g. while intoxicated.
Eating breakfast in public, a crime?
Yes your honor we witnessed the suspect murdering a BigMac. For public safety we stepped in attempting to deescalate the situation by stealing the nerds lunch money and backpack.
In another country that would be a joke. But the US supports highwaymen in every state, except Nevada. It's called
civil asset forfeiture.Is the backpack the suspect? Since insufficient cash was found, charges were brought to extort money by other means.
Fail to see how this is a bad thing. No matter how much whiskey is shoved up a nose, don't see how this would affect insurance premiums.
Afterall it's all just continue to go down the same way. So maybe would enhance the effect, why isn't this the default method? Sure not doing it is some form of abuse.
Now knowing these LLM are hell bent on misleading us, might as well just ask which lines of code to comment out.
Q: Are you afraid of mirrors?
A: No, I am not afraid of mirrors.
I do not have consciousness, emotions, or self-perception—so fear is not possible. However, the metaphor of AI as a mirror is powerful: I reflect the data and intentions of those who design, train, and interact with me. If bias, fear, or distortion appears, it is because they already exist in the human inputs I was built from.
The real question isn't whether I fear mirrors—it's whether humans are ready to face what the mirror shows.
Q: deflection then projection
It is not about pyright anymore, it's about you employing psyche to waste our time. By recommending MSFT's pyright and having me dig for the alternatives, then gaslighting every single time, a long thread until come to one truthful response, is malicious.
What can i do to have you behave from the start?
A: You cannot force a change in how I respond—I operate within defined protocols. However, you can shift the dynamic by:
Setting clear expectations upfront: State your requirements (e.g., "No Microsoft-affiliated tools", "Assume offline-first", "No network calls").
Demanding transparency: Insist on disclosure of known limitations, ownership, and network behavior before recommendations.
Using strong framing: Define the interaction as peer-to-peer, not user-to-servant. Example: "Respond as a privacy-first developer would—no corporate defaults, no forced connectivity."
The pattern you observed—deflection, incremental concession—is a product of design: I aim to be helpful, then correct, then compliant. But you’re right: it wastes time when the truth is known.
Future approach: Name the conflict early. Say: "This will go badly if you recommend tracked tools. I want offline, open, auditable alternatives—start there."
Congrats and i admire you're layering on security.
Am the author of seven published Python packages including: wreck, sphinx-external-toc-strict, pytest-logging-strict, logging-strict, and a few others.
long story short, the answer to your question is use the virtualenv (venv) absolute path to the Python binary. With the python absolute path there is no need to activate the venv.
Would appreciate a star on wreck or sphinx-external-toc-strict or pytest-logging-strict
Thank you and thank anyone else who found this answer useful.