Cockroach comes from the 17th century, the scientific method can be anywhere between at least ancient egypt and 20th century depending on how strict you go about what does and does not count as the scientific method.
Or you can be silly and pin both on the year 1620, meaning cockroaches as a word is exactly as old as the scientific method
What the article fails to mention is that the models have been "slightly modified while remaining visually very close to the actual product", meaning these are meant for CAD design and rendering, not for performance testing or 3D printing. Their announcement says as much and that's most likely the reason behind the winky face in the tweet.
Whoever wrote the article couldn't've been bothered to read two extra paragraphs and skipped straight to the word "disclaimer", I guess
They must be from the silent generation
Conversely, an average Tesla worker did Musk's annual workload every 4.2 seconds
already switched to airvpn. their client isn't as polished, but I'd rather have my living standards reduced than willingly give money to a nazi
If Hartlepool is anything to go by, he can just take it off. I think he'd wear it anyways, if not always then at least occassionally
From where CEOs stand, an average paying job is no different from the lowest paying job
At that point is there anything that doesn't fit this definition? xdd
I guess income that goes to luxury things such as groceries and bills would still get taxed
it's a quote from the article
Estrodjinn, even
same thing happens when you look up hatsune miku, kasane teto, or the yellow one
*disintegrates into chalk*
Cockroach comes from the 17th century, the scientific method can be anywhere between at least ancient egypt and 20th century depending on how strict you go about what does and does not count as the scientific method.
Or you can be silly and pin both on the year 1620, meaning cockroaches as a word is exactly as old as the scientific method
Can't use the billionaire tax money because it doesn't exist
What the article fails to mention is that the models have been "slightly modified while remaining visually very close to the actual product", meaning these are meant for CAD design and rendering, not for performance testing or 3D printing. Their announcement says as much and that's most likely the reason behind the winky face in the tweet.
Whoever wrote the article couldn't've been bothered to read two extra paragraphs and skipped straight to the word "disclaimer", I guess
why would it be painful?
coming right after
might sound silly, but they're being truthful. They are not standing by while T rights are legislated away, they actively support it.
Perchance this person would prefer it being LGB instead
Spock explained what a question is
the hateful eight
good time to plug the technology connections video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM