I too have been on protest marches. Evey government for over a decade has talked about being hard on immigration and stopping the boats. This lot need not fear that they're doing something the government really doesn't like. They deserve mockery because it's clear that they don't want people to identify them. My guess is that are known neo-nazis, and they want to pretend to be 'ordinary concerned citizens'; my second guess is that they are a rent-a-mob, funded through Nigel's dodgy £5M, and this is a distraction from the C4 illegal donations story. It can be both, of course.
There would be nothing bad with LLMs provided that:
They weren't based on colossal scale appropriation of people's copyrighted work - are there any like that? The companies are actually laundering their IP addresses so that they can't be blocked (see recent article on the LKML for an example). I don't call that "fair use".
They weren't being powered by building new fossil-fuel generators in the middle of heatwaves that make it very clear that the climate emergency is here and now (the idea that LLMs are going to solve that problem for us is laughable).
I could go on. Nothing bad, so long as we ignore all the bad parts.
Clarkson who, after starting to run a farm, told us that his previous climate change denial was all a joke. He doesn't even have the guts to own it. Let him look at his scorched fields and know that he helped make this happen.
It's such a stupid framing. If the NHS is responsible for fewer years in good health now, then it was equally responsible for more years in good health 15 years ago.
So we should ask what has changed in the NHS to make the outcomes worse? Austerity and creeping privatisation, for a start.
If they didn't like it when they heard the judgement, the government could have decided to change the law. They can't say "it was the Supreme Court, our hands are tied"; they're the government, and they have a majority. There was nothing in the King's Speech, so they have chosen to keep it as it is. This is the government's transphobia, not the Supreme Court's.
Nothing wrong with a good nitpick.
I too have been on protest marches. Evey government for over a decade has talked about being hard on immigration and stopping the boats. This lot need not fear that they're doing something the government really doesn't like. They deserve mockery because it's clear that they don't want people to identify them. My guess is that are known neo-nazis, and they want to pretend to be 'ordinary concerned citizens'; my second guess is that they are a rent-a-mob, funded through Nigel's dodgy £5M, and this is a distraction from the C4 illegal donations story. It can be both, of course.
Why do legitimate protesters have to hide their faces? What are they ashamed of?
There would be nothing bad with LLMs provided that:
They weren't based on colossal scale appropriation of people's copyrighted work - are there any like that? The companies are actually laundering their IP addresses so that they can't be blocked (see recent article on the LKML for an example). I don't call that "fair use".
They weren't being powered by building new fossil-fuel generators in the middle of heatwaves that make it very clear that the climate emergency is here and now (the idea that LLMs are going to solve that problem for us is laughable).
I could go on. Nothing bad, so long as we ignore all the bad parts.
How is it that we're missing our carbon targets? I guess we'll never know.
Clarkson who, after starting to run a farm, told us that his previous climate change denial was all a joke. He doesn't even have the guts to own it. Let him look at his scorched fields and know that he helped make this happen.
It's such a stupid framing. If the NHS is responsible for fewer years in good health now, then it was equally responsible for more years in good health 15 years ago.
So we should ask what has changed in the NHS to make the outcomes worse? Austerity and creeping privatisation, for a start.
3rd largest economy in the World.
Merz: this is not working - Germans are too lazy - we need to change something.
Because they realized that forcing people with a highly infectious disease to go and speak to the doctor in person was not the best idea!
He says that it's a competitive disadvantage as if other countries already have policies like this.
And the German citizens who are so dishonest are the ones who voted him into power, so what does that say about him?
What tips does the article have to share? "Just use a fan".
I could say the same about some of my co-workers.
"in two weeks" (never)
And I'm sure that handing big NHS contracts to American companies owned by billionaires doesn't contribute to that in any way.
Oh that's not true. Peter likes him.
If they didn't like it when they heard the judgement, the government could have decided to change the law. They can't say "it was the Supreme Court, our hands are tied"; they're the government, and they have a majority. There was nothing in the King's Speech, so they have chosen to keep it as it is. This is the government's transphobia, not the Supreme Court's.
Indeed. What Daniel actually said was that, if you have already used the other AI tools to find bugs, Mythos is unlikely to find more.
I never saw any eagle elements to it. I have taken another look, and I still don't. It looks like demogorgon - admittedly with 4 arms instead of 2!
As we know, Wes "use the spare capacity of the private sector" Streeting is totally opposed to privatisation by stealth.
Nobody seems to be talking about the demogorgon in the top middle. Its head is cropped out in this example, but you can see it in the others.
What on Earth did they use for a prompt, that it included that?