On the bright side, Germany is attracting Chinese scientists and students. Students will help the economy since they pay tuition, and some will stay and apply their talent. I'm surprised many Chinese scientists and students want to learn to speak German. Germany should encourage more to come.
Ukraine is not really application of the flypaper theory since Russia took the initiative in invading Ukraine. The West did not draw Russia to invade. However, to stop Russia's hybrid attacks on Europe, Europe could supply Ukraine with more weapons such as Germany's Taurus missile and France's Rafale jet fighter.
It is debatable whether the UK and France had the military capability to stop Hitler or simply didn't have the will.
Why would Russia use SAS veterans to train their troops? Russia has its own special forces, Spetsnaz. Spetsnaz would be more familiar with Russian weapons, tactics, and the type of war in Ukraine.
You have to review the context of our discussion. It concerned the solution to Russia's hybrid war against Europe. You mistakenly thought I said use Ukraine as a fly paper. In response I said Europe would prefer that it be the fly paper.
The president of Czechoslovakia, Edouard Benes was unwilling to give the Sudetenland to Hitler and appealed to France with whom Czechoslovakia had a defensive alliance. France asked the UK for help.
The UK and France thought that letting Hitler have the Sudetenland would appease him and prevent a war. It didn't.
The flypaper theory is correct but in the Battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French underestimated the Viet Minh. Specifically, the French didn't believe the Viet Minh would be able to haul artillery up the surrounding mountains.
What I said was that Europe would prefer that Russia attack it rather than Ukraine. Then the combined forces of Europe would be able to defeat Russia. War might be inevitable if Russia continues to attack Ukraine and provoke Europe with hybrid war. The UK and France gave Hitler the Sudetenland hoping that this would appease him and avoid war but it didn't.
The Battle of Dien Bien Phu used the flypaper theory in that the French attempted to draw the Viet Minh into attacking Dien Bien Phu where the French thought they could destroy them.
War between Europe and Russia would be destructive but Europe has to decide a solution to Russia's hybrid war against it.
The TPS program should be ended. People can be helped in their own countries. However, those already here should be given a chance to stay if they qualify.
Since the CDU has already adopted a tougher immigration policy, the AfD is exploiting Germany's economic problems just as Hitler rose to power because the democratic Weimar Republic couldn't control inflation. The CDU has to ask how the AfD plans to solve Germany's economic problems. Some believe that Hitler's economic policies would not have worked but they were masked by the war.
The Battle of Dien Bien Phu is a better example of the Flypaper Strategy. In the case of Ukraine, Europe is not trying to draw Russia to attack Ukraine but it's Putin making that choice. Actually, it would be better to attract Russia to attack Europe where it could be destroyed by the combined European armies and perhaps the US but don't count on Trump. In the present situation, Europe could help Ukraine more. France could supply its Rafale fighter and Germany its Taurus missile.
This shows the importance of helping Ukraine win. As long as Russia is fighting in Ukraine, it is difficult for it to turn its attention elsewhere. If Ukraine wins, Europe will have Ukraine on its side.
The accusation of antisemitism wouldn't work because most American Jews would be opposed to removing Palestinians forcibly from Gaza. Removing Palestinians would diminish the Holocaust since people would see Israelis as no different than the Nazis.
Yes, if it does not go along. That's reasonable since Europe is spending money supplying weapons and in my proposal the UK and France are willing to send in troops if Putin rejects the proposal.
The British and French air forces might be able to gain air superiority. British and French troops would boost Ukrainian morale possibly increasing enlistment. The UK and France are no weaker than Russia which is having a difficult time defeating Ukraine.
The West has to decide whether it wants Ukraine to win or lose. Ukraine cannot win if Europe is afraid of antagonizing Putin. Remember at one time the West was afraid to supply jet fighters and tanks to Ukraine. If Putin realizes the West is afraid of nuclear weapons, then he will threaten to use them every time the West wants to give Ukraine an edge. Of course, some caution is necessary. That's the reason in my proposal only the UK and France would supply troops. If too many European countries join, Putin will say he must use nuclear weapons because he is being overwhelmed.
On the bright side, Germany is attracting Chinese scientists and students. Students will help the economy since they pay tuition, and some will stay and apply their talent. I'm surprised many Chinese scientists and students want to learn to speak German. Germany should encourage more to come.
Ukraine is not really application of the flypaper theory since Russia took the initiative in invading Ukraine. The West did not draw Russia to invade. However, to stop Russia's hybrid attacks on Europe, Europe could supply Ukraine with more weapons such as Germany's Taurus missile and France's Rafale jet fighter.
It is debatable whether the UK and France had the military capability to stop Hitler or simply didn't have the will.
Why would Russia use SAS veterans to train their troops? Russia has its own special forces, Spetsnaz. Spetsnaz would be more familiar with Russian weapons, tactics, and the type of war in Ukraine.
You have to review the context of our discussion. It concerned the solution to Russia's hybrid war against Europe. You mistakenly thought I said use Ukraine as a fly paper. In response I said Europe would prefer that it be the fly paper.
The president of Czechoslovakia, Edouard Benes was unwilling to give the Sudetenland to Hitler and appealed to France with whom Czechoslovakia had a defensive alliance. France asked the UK for help.
The UK and France thought that letting Hitler have the Sudetenland would appease him and prevent a war. It didn't.
The flypaper theory is correct but in the Battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French underestimated the Viet Minh. Specifically, the French didn't believe the Viet Minh would be able to haul artillery up the surrounding mountains.
What I said was that Europe would prefer that Russia attack it rather than Ukraine. Then the combined forces of Europe would be able to defeat Russia. War might be inevitable if Russia continues to attack Ukraine and provoke Europe with hybrid war. The UK and France gave Hitler the Sudetenland hoping that this would appease him and avoid war but it didn't.
Summoning the US ambassador won't do any good. The most important thing is for the world to know that Trump loves power and control.
The Battle of Dien Bien Phu used the flypaper theory in that the French attempted to draw the Viet Minh into attacking Dien Bien Phu where the French thought they could destroy them.
War between Europe and Russia would be destructive but Europe has to decide a solution to Russia's hybrid war against it.
The TPS program should be ended. People can be helped in their own countries. However, those already here should be given a chance to stay if they qualify.
On the bright side, this must mean China is that advanced in some forms of semiconductor technology.
Since the CDU has already adopted a tougher immigration policy, the AfD is exploiting Germany's economic problems just as Hitler rose to power because the democratic Weimar Republic couldn't control inflation. The CDU has to ask how the AfD plans to solve Germany's economic problems. Some believe that Hitler's economic policies would not have worked but they were masked by the war.
The Battle of Dien Bien Phu is a better example of the Flypaper Strategy. In the case of Ukraine, Europe is not trying to draw Russia to attack Ukraine but it's Putin making that choice. Actually, it would be better to attract Russia to attack Europe where it could be destroyed by the combined European armies and perhaps the US but don't count on Trump. In the present situation, Europe could help Ukraine more. France could supply its Rafale fighter and Germany its Taurus missile.
This shows the importance of helping Ukraine win. As long as Russia is fighting in Ukraine, it is difficult for it to turn its attention elsewhere. If Ukraine wins, Europe will have Ukraine on its side.
Perhaps this will increase Germany's employment. This is the way to stop the AfD.
The accusation of antisemitism wouldn't work because most American Jews would be opposed to removing Palestinians forcibly from Gaza. Removing Palestinians would diminish the Holocaust since people would see Israelis as no different than the Nazis.
Well, under Putin's strong leadership Russia is having a difficult time defeating Ukraine.
Yes, if it does not go along. That's reasonable since Europe is spending money supplying weapons and in my proposal the UK and France are willing to send in troops if Putin rejects the proposal.
There are two ways to stop gerrymandering, proportional representation or have a computer program draw congressional districts.
Since Europe supplies Ukraine with weapons, Ukraine will accept the deal if Europe does.
The British and French air forces might be able to gain air superiority. British and French troops would boost Ukrainian morale possibly increasing enlistment. The UK and France are no weaker than Russia which is having a difficult time defeating Ukraine.
The West has to decide whether it wants Ukraine to win or lose. Ukraine cannot win if Europe is afraid of antagonizing Putin. Remember at one time the West was afraid to supply jet fighters and tanks to Ukraine. If Putin realizes the West is afraid of nuclear weapons, then he will threaten to use them every time the West wants to give Ukraine an edge. Of course, some caution is necessary. That's the reason in my proposal only the UK and France would supply troops. If too many European countries join, Putin will say he must use nuclear weapons because he is being overwhelmed.