"avoids direct responsibility" au sens où ce ne sont pas les autorités qui commettent les gestes... mais évidemment, comme la vidéo le présente bien, la complicité demeure via, par exemple, les armes procurées en pleine connaissance de cause... et donc une part importante de responsabilité revient aux autorités...
"don't kid yourself" is an obvious logical fallacy, as if any form of disagreement with a proposition were de facto invalid though no evidence whatsoever is provided that could inclusively rule out all disagreement... truth needs no such artifice...
"Support for the U.S. military conflict with Iran remains low, with only 33% to 37% of Americans approving of the military strikes, according to nationwide polls.
Key metrics from the latest polling include:
Approval: Just 33% to 37% of respondents approve of U.S. military strikes against Iran.
Disapproval: Roughly 59% to 62% of Americans oppose the conflict or disapprove of President Trump's handling of the situation." [Google AI Overview]
this seems highly doubtful... the POTUS is already under pressure following the 2 deaths at the US base in Jordan...
also :
"The Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll is not officially affiliated with either political party, but it has a documented house effect that often skews more favorably toward conservative politicians and Republican talking points than other national surveys." [Google AI Overview]
good luck with that... at least provide some sort of argumentation maybe ?
the institutions that have been put in place to deliver order and justice (e.g. the ICJ, the ICC, the UNSC, ...) at the international level sorely need upgrading and upfunding... the systems mostly work, though reforms are needed (e.g. UNSC vetoes), but for now their responses seem way too slow, and the public are understandably wary of investing their faith in them...
again, you might want to consider upgrading your knowledge of religion...
merely parroting the usual misrepresentations about religion proves absolutely nothing...
and a warning is not a threat...
furthermore, the language you have been using from the beginning of your presence here clearly raises serious doubts about your position : no one who genuinely knows the struggles of attaining higher moral ground would risk undermining the advantage through such irresponsible speech...
good luck supporting such a wild claim with verifiable facts...
and you might want to consider upgrading your knowledge of religion... you are clearly missing out on important wisdom regarding human nature and its requirements...
the problem is not the people themselves, but some of the ideology, parts of the culture, some of the aims and methods, the atrocious operations and crimes, and similar actions and attitudes along those lines... vilifying people as "nazis" misses the mark when the problem is actually the nazism...
@InternetDev @palestine@a.gup.pe @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com
"avoids direct responsibility" au sens où ce ne sont pas les autorités qui commettent les gestes... mais évidemment, comme la vidéo le présente bien, la complicité demeure via, par exemple, les armes procurées en pleine connaissance de cause... et donc une part importante de responsabilité revient aux autorités...
@nocomment @palestine@a.gup.pe @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com
"don't kid yourself" is an obvious logical fallacy, as if any form of disagreement with a proposition were de facto invalid though no evidence whatsoever is provided that could inclusively rule out all disagreement... truth needs no such artifice...
@nocomment @palestine@a.gup.pe @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com
and :
"Support for the U.S. military conflict with Iran remains low, with only 33% to 37% of Americans approving of the military strikes, according to nationwide polls.
Key metrics from the latest polling include:
Approval: Just 33% to 37% of respondents approve of U.S. military strikes against Iran.
Disapproval: Roughly 59% to 62% of Americans oppose the conflict or disapprove of President Trump's handling of the situation." [Google AI Overview]
@nocomment @palestine@a.gup.pe @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com
this seems highly doubtful... the POTUS is already under pressure following the 2 deaths at the US base in Jordan...
also :
"The Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll is not officially affiliated with either political party, but it has a documented house effect that often skews more favorably toward conservative politicians and Republican talking points than other national surveys." [Google AI Overview]
+++
@nocomment @palestine@a.gup.pe @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com
good luck with that... at least provide some sort of argumentation maybe ?
the institutions that have been put in place to deliver order and justice (e.g. the ICJ, the ICC, the UNSC, ...) at the international level sorely need upgrading and upfunding... the systems mostly work, though reforms are needed (e.g. UNSC vetoes), but for now their responses seem way too slow, and the public are understandably wary of investing their faith in them...
@matthurtme
again, you might want to consider upgrading your knowledge of religion...
merely parroting the usual misrepresentations about religion proves absolutely nothing...
and a warning is not a threat...
furthermore, the language you have been using from the beginning of your presence here clearly raises serious doubts about your position : no one who genuinely knows the struggles of attaining higher moral ground would risk undermining the advantage through such irresponsible speech...
@matthurtme
good luck supporting such a wild claim with verifiable facts...
and you might want to consider upgrading your knowledge of religion... you are clearly missing out on important wisdom regarding human nature and its requirements...
@SocialistVibes01
depending on what you mean by "World Cup online commitment" ?
@matthurtme
#reported for hate speech...
@SocialistVibes01
many are trying... but 10% seems like a tall order...
@umbrella
the problem is not the people themselves, but some of the ideology, parts of the culture, some of the aims and methods, the atrocious operations and crimes, and similar actions and attitudes along those lines... vilifying people as "nazis" misses the mark when the problem is actually the nazism...
@rzeta0 @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com
i specifically used the words "we collectively" to refer to the movement as a whole...
@rzeta0 @palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@fedibird.com
or we collectively must do a better job at reaching and convincing everyone...
@frightful_hobgoblin
it depends on who you're refering to through the "we"...
and it seems like at least some of "they" needed not merely to be told, but to experience that first hand...