This is why some cities have banned the rental services. Paris has plenty of electric scooters, but they banned the rental services. Keeps the benefits of the scooters for micro mobility, but no scooters lying everywhere.
A lot of the answers here are short or quippy. So, here's a more detailed take. LLMs don't "know" how good a source is. They are word association machines. They are very good at that. When you use something like Perplexity, an external API feeds information from the search queries into the LLM, and then it summarizes that text in (hopefully) a coherent way. There are ways to reduce hallucination rate and check factualness of sources, e.g. by comparing the generated text against authoritative information. But how much of that is employed by Perplexity et al I have no idea.
It is a full Linux stack. It is not Android. It has its own set of apps. Written in Qt with C++ (mostly) and their own UI framework, Silica. It can run Android apps through a layer similar to Waydroid.
Well when Roosevelt was elected 4 times, it was actually legal back then. And he's the reason why the 2 term limit amendment exists. But of course, that requires actually following the law, so...
This is probably one of the best actual uses for something like generative AI. With enough data, they should be able to vectorize and translate dolphin language, assuming there is one.
Well if she is acquitted on appeal for example. But no idea how the sentencing works in cases like this. Maybe someone with knowledge of French law can chime in.
Sounds about right. Also illegal.
What state?
North Carolina?
I know. I have NodeBB as a backup.
I imagine that was part of it, but I doubt it's the actual main reason. More of a post justification.
Or if you just ignore federal courts, which seems to be the current fashion.
This is why some cities have banned the rental services. Paris has plenty of electric scooters, but they banned the rental services. Keeps the benefits of the scooters for micro mobility, but no scooters lying everywhere.
Rclone can do file mounts as well as sync.
A lot of the answers here are short or quippy. So, here's a more detailed take. LLMs don't "know" how good a source is. They are word association machines. They are very good at that. When you use something like Perplexity, an external API feeds information from the search queries into the LLM, and then it summarizes that text in (hopefully) a coherent way. There are ways to reduce hallucination rate and check factualness of sources, e.g. by comparing the generated text against authoritative information. But how much of that is employed by Perplexity et al I have no idea.
What is actually happening to the computer in the image?
I think you have the wrong full generation parameters here.
Can you link the feeds?
Is the code available somewhere?
It is a full Linux stack. It is not Android. It has its own set of apps. Written in Qt with C++ (mostly) and their own UI framework, Silica. It can run Android apps through a layer similar to Waydroid.
Well when Roosevelt was elected 4 times, it was actually legal back then. And he's the reason why the 2 term limit amendment exists. But of course, that requires actually following the law, so...
Because of the porn or AI? 🙃
This is probably one of the best actual uses for something like generative AI. With enough data, they should be able to vectorize and translate dolphin language, assuming there is one.
Well if she is acquitted on appeal for example. But no idea how the sentencing works in cases like this. Maybe someone with knowledge of French law can chime in.
1 scenario tested is better than 0 tested.
This guy would fit in well at my previous job where the founder discouraged writing unit tests because "there are too many scenarios to test."
Like, wtf...