It's basically like with the ps2, there were some ps2 homebrew titles that I remember seeing on YouTube that did something related to 720p, but most retail games didn't fully utilize that. The original Xbox for the most part, (maybe there might be some obscure exceptions) the games would actually show up nice and crisp on a CRT at either a native or close to native CRT resolution, with better graphics then the ps2 and GameCube.
I'm actually afraid the opposite might actually happen.
if users (especially new potential users to the Fediverse.) find that social media requires them to id verifiy most of them will probably just either stick to a narrow smaller few of sites they know people use, or they'l obsolete themselves from the social media aspects of the internet entirely.
I actually want to find out how Google will get out of this one. Without any type of lobbying. Even in the u.s ai search promp resualts are technically considered Googles own speech and they are legally responsible. Sadly no one in government seems interested in enforcing ai and even where there is there is this push to take the power from the states to regulate ai.
I'm not as up to date (like at all lol) with specifically open source ai. Is it any better then corporate ai? Including data center-like resources use? or otherwise?
Rayman and Sonic are some interesting case studies for this type of thing.
Sonic started with 2d when it was at its original peak(SNES.genesis) then dived into 3d in its peak with the Saturn and Dreamcast and ps2 Gamecube, Xbox. and now with the switch Sonic dived back into 2d with games like Sonic mania, and some mobile games, wile still delivering 3d. Sonic has a lot of boht 3d and 2d games from that ip.
Rayman is similarly interesting but what is interesting about it particularly was the first game was 2d but was (for 2d game standards) made for more modern hardware, the ps1/ Atari Jaguar. In the case of Rayman, hardware limitations weren't as much of an issue you can actually view the 2d genre as a genre. Then it dived into 3d with the second and third game. but then interestingly, for their ps3/Xbox 360 and Wii/wii u. Rayman games they again made a 2d game for modern hardware. You could play 2d for the genre itself not strictly because of hardware limitations. Rayman is probally one of the better games to fairly compare 2d and 3d games in the same IP.
Both of these are platformers however. not fighting games or others particularly.
Why can't people talk about flock in a public forum? They claim its because there's lots of them. I think it's because they just don't want to hear what people think about it. Some kind of ai spy tracking agenda.
Here's a legal tip you likely don't hear everyday.
Wear clothing worn by a smaller percent. This could reduce the chance of false accusations if you truly are innocent. I mean in this specific case it probally could.
Realistically what good would it do once you already had scraped the pattern of news sites it's already over. All this is doing in actuality is preventing new start ups from competing in the ai space. so really this is the fastest enshitification world record of a medium. Whether you like or hate ai this is actually an enshitification of it. ( I hate ai.)
This is literally impossible even with ai and a dangerous bill for big tech. While for smaller Fediverse Communities it's much much easier to moderate that type of content since
a. we don't have to rely on a corporation to provide the tools we need.
b. you would only be responsible (I think) for content on your own local feeds. However if you are responsible for federated content appealing as well, might want to federate with servers with some type of user verification (not id verification) but like verifying your use purpose of a server they are joining. and defederate from other servers that are not moderating their local feeds.
The idea is good but even with ai measures minors can easily fake an ai face id verification. I don't think it's possible to prevent 100% of cases.
But hopefully if this actual results in the ai tech improving at preventing a over whelming majority of kids faking their ages it would be extremely rare. If not.. the amount of fines tech companies might risk facing could potentially bankrupt them if too many kept sneeking past the ai and the gov acted against Google for that. the fines for that type of content isn't usually a small matter.
Can they actually force a write of a large file to test it or do they look at your specs? If they can actually force a large file writing whether it's 100 mb or 50 gb, 1tb this isn't even really a privacy issue it's just a, tech companies can just step all over you and your ardwae st to make sure your human or to make sure they can track your preferences.
That is 100% true u.s states laws are essentially federated. However, Google and Meta are big 'monopolistic' the companies who want to be able to profit and age verification opens that up for them and so expect them to use terms like 'global regulations' or any excuses to further push for verification.
As much as they (alt right/conservatives) talk about being censored. I don't think any u.s democrat elected official has ever went this far against their networks, as much as they disliked their views. This doesn't look good.
Is the recaptcha on Google search engine, apps, android os more than one? or is it strictly 3rd party websites?
Yeah, for Facebook. Will people trust smaller sites like Piefed.zip, in droves?
It's basically like with the ps2, there were some ps2 homebrew titles that I remember seeing on YouTube that did something related to 720p, but most retail games didn't fully utilize that. The original Xbox for the most part, (maybe there might be some obscure exceptions) the games would actually show up nice and crisp on a CRT at either a native or close to native CRT resolution, with better graphics then the ps2 and GameCube.
I'm actually afraid the opposite might actually happen.
if users (especially new potential users to the Fediverse.) find that social media requires them to id verifiy most of them will probably just either stick to a narrow smaller few of sites they know people use, or they'l obsolete themselves from the social media aspects of the internet entirely.
I actually want to find out how Google will get out of this one. Without any type of lobbying. Even in the u.s ai search promp resualts are technically considered Googles own speech and they are legally responsible. Sadly no one in government seems interested in enforcing ai and even where there is there is this push to take the power from the states to regulate ai.
I'm not as up to date (like at all lol) with specifically open source ai. Is it any better then corporate ai? Including data center-like resources use? or otherwise?
Rayman and Sonic are some interesting case studies for this type of thing.
Sonic started with 2d when it was at its original peak(SNES.genesis) then dived into 3d in its peak with the Saturn and Dreamcast and ps2 Gamecube, Xbox. and now with the switch Sonic dived back into 2d with games like Sonic mania, and some mobile games, wile still delivering 3d. Sonic has a lot of boht 3d and 2d games from that ip.
Rayman is similarly interesting but what is interesting about it particularly was the first game was 2d but was (for 2d game standards) made for more modern hardware, the ps1/ Atari Jaguar. In the case of Rayman, hardware limitations weren't as much of an issue you can actually view the 2d genre as a genre. Then it dived into 3d with the second and third game. but then interestingly, for their ps3/Xbox 360 and Wii/wii u. Rayman games they again made a 2d game for modern hardware. You could play 2d for the genre itself not strictly because of hardware limitations. Rayman is probally one of the better games to fairly compare 2d and 3d games in the same IP.
Both of these are platformers however. not fighting games or others particularly.
Why can't people talk about flock in a public forum? They claim its because there's lots of them. I think it's because they just don't want to hear what people think about it. Some kind of ai spy tracking agenda.
Here's a legal tip you likely don't hear everyday.
Wear clothing worn by a smaller percent. This could reduce the chance of false accusations if you truly are innocent. I mean in this specific case it probally could.
or just let people opt out entirely flat out?
Realistically what good would it do once you already had scraped the pattern of news sites it's already over. All this is doing in actuality is preventing new start ups from competing in the ai space. so really this is the fastest enshitification world record of a medium. Whether you like or hate ai this is actually an enshitification of it. ( I hate ai.)
This is literally impossible even with ai and a dangerous bill for big tech. While for smaller Fediverse Communities it's much much easier to moderate that type of content since
a. we don't have to rely on a corporation to provide the tools we need.
b. you would only be responsible (I think) for content on your own local feeds. However if you are responsible for federated content appealing as well, might want to federate with servers with some type of user verification (not id verification) but like verifying your use purpose of a server they are joining. and defederate from other servers that are not moderating their local feeds.
That's what i'm concerned about.
The idea is good but even with ai measures minors can easily fake an ai face id verification. I don't think it's possible to prevent 100% of cases.
But hopefully if this actual results in the ai tech improving at preventing a over whelming majority of kids faking their ages it would be extremely rare. If not.. the amount of fines tech companies might risk facing could potentially bankrupt them if too many kept sneeking past the ai and the gov acted against Google for that. the fines for that type of content isn't usually a small matter.
Hopefully ai bot traffic isn't surpassing human users yet on the Fediverse.
How easy is it to just install a firewall and block the parent moderating app from getting any data?
Can they actually force a write of a large file to test it or do they look at your specs? If they can actually force a large file writing whether it's 100 mb or 50 gb, 1tb this isn't even really a privacy issue it's just a, tech companies can just step all over you and your ardwae st to make sure your human or to make sure they can track your preferences.
Does this appear on Google search or on specific websites that use this REcapcha?
That is 100% true u.s states laws are essentially federated. However, Google and Meta are big 'monopolistic' the companies who want to be able to profit and age verification opens that up for them and so expect them to use terms like 'global regulations' or any excuses to further push for verification.
As much as they (alt right/conservatives) talk about being censored. I don't think any u.s democrat elected official has ever went this far against their networks, as much as they disliked their views. This doesn't look good.