Ofcourse, we don't get proper footage from the ground from "fact checkers" to check if blue things indeed are untouched.
I'm interested to read what details they fact-check to 'debunk' the main issue.
And if anyone has proper drone footage supporting/debunking it, i'm interested as well
well, i've been denied many things over those years because i didn't get the jab, while seeing our ministers flat out lying (because i knew which Pfizer phase 2/3 trials for pregnant women >18jr were still ongoing at the time).
And the whole Covid-era was abruptly stopped when Ukraine came, and suddenly nothing about corona?! wtf. who are we kidding.
Oh.. and media calling Bill Gates a philanthropist. What a joke.
So yes, i'm against the narrative, because it's been well organized and censored.
The bashing of HCQ was started of by a fraud piece. The Lancet published that study which made all media go crazy, making all doctors using HCQ out for a quacks and losing/risking their license. Only a few weeks later Lancet retracted that peer reviewed paper of Surgisphere, because "HCQ quacks" looked at the actual data and realized it couldn't be proper and asked Lancet to audit it. i.e. so much for the mainstream "fact checkers".
Similar happened with Ivermectin. (my brother has a strong case for the efficacy of ivermectin with covid19. More on IVM at http://www.flccc.net )
They're making sure to crack down on any alternative, because otherwise the EUA/CMA license can't be approved for the covid19 gene therapy injections.
And if that's not all, quite a few instructions went against normal conduct, like;
denying lung patients antibiotics and insisting on laying them still, which are both anti-standard practice, as i heard a lung nurse vent.
pushing a new medicine Remdesivir while having questionable study outcome.
insisting you stay at home and do nothing other than taking Aspirin, thus getting sicker, and when sick enough and getting pneumonia(which is the deadly stage) you go to the hospital possibly on a ventilator.
like a HCQ study being setup, ignoring results from the field regarding efficacy increasing combinations & dosage, ignoring suggestions by peers. One study even used toxic dosage, while HCQ safety profile is known for 50 years already.
Dutch government pretending the covid-measures(lockdowns etc) were legal while they weren't. It hadn't even passed the 1st chamber.
But let's not mention the excess mortality going on in some countries, not since covid19, but since the jabs.. Media etc is silent for some reason. And in case heart/stroke mortality is reported, they're making people believe it's because of warmth🤦♂️
What worries me; The next wave the WHO has everything in place legal wise, and Dutch govt even signed(like many WHO affiliates) to follow WHO mandates(sidestepping our government) whenever WHO calls a self-proclaimed pandemic.. And without the mrna-jab(s) you increasingly will be excluded, there's multiple bodies steering in that direction.
No one is stopping you from taking ivermectin or stopping your doctor prescribing it to you.
Found these articles about suspended licenses because of prescribing IVM. Found them by using another search engine than Google. Only side-stream news is reporting on it, it seems..
And indeed EMA and FDA have the same narrative regarding the covid jabs. Have you even heard of CMA and EUA licenses? Your fact-checkers probably left that out of the equation.
If you were interested in the least, you would have been surprised that in EU, US and AU the same bashing and banning occurred. Did you even know youtube ghosted comments and deleting comments mentioning ivermectin? (While FDA didn't "prohibit" ivermectin?!).
I'm quite annoyed by you provided a nonsense fact check, having no answers to anything, and even calling the conspiracy flag. To me you're like the rest of the science deniers and fact check followers.
Fyi, if you use google for searching information which are 'fact check' category , then google switches to 'safe mode'. better use other search engine in that case
Depends who you listen to. I know multiple including my brother, whose outcome changed drastically within 4 days(after 10 days bed ridden)
Have you seen http://flccc.net ?
FDA(US), EMA(EU) do exactly the same regarding covid19 treatments. Where EUA-license was granted to the new injections by FDA, the EMA granted the CMA-license. EUA and CMA are essentially the same. Those licenses were only allowed if nothing else was a viable option. fyi; Many have speculated this being the reason for the crackdown on anything remotely effective( i.e. CQ, HCQ, IVM )
Arup is a global collective of designers, engineering and sustainability consultants, advisors and experts dedicated to sustainable development, and to using imagination, technology and rigour to shape a better world.
Christianity has many streams, all trying to do better than the other, in following the words of the Bible.
Scientology doesn't follow the Bible.
And then there are people who were far into dark spiritual practices(goes by many forms and names), like the host of that youtube channel, who found out that turning to the ressurrected Jesus Christ made their "spirit guides"(which Jesus points out as demonic spirits) tremble.
2GB documentary video https://rumble.com/v39qsw4-maui-fires-a-complete-deep-dive-discover-47-facts-about-the.html
Many shorts on tiktok
https://www.tiktok.com/tag/westmauifires
Locals voicing their views:
https://twitter.com/TheThe1776/status/1690501144999780352
https://twitter.com/TheThe1776/status/1690479662592643072
https://twitter.com/Ivankalema01/status/1690637790323560448
(if you want to save twitter video's: https://twittervideodownloader.com/ , for many other video platforms https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp )
Detailed Drone footage
https://odysee.com/@Adult_White_Female:9/day-after-fire-Drone-Lahaina-Maui-Detailed-Aerial:b
Ofcourse, we don't get proper footage from the ground from "fact checkers" to check if blue things indeed are untouched. I'm interested to read what details they fact-check to 'debunk' the main issue. And if anyone has proper drone footage supporting/debunking it, i'm interested as well
well, i've been denied many things over those years because i didn't get the jab, while seeing our ministers flat out lying (because i knew which Pfizer phase 2/3 trials for pregnant women >18jr were still ongoing at the time).
And the whole Covid-era was abruptly stopped when Ukraine came, and suddenly nothing about corona?! wtf. who are we kidding.
Oh.. and media calling Bill Gates a philanthropist. What a joke.
So yes, i'm against the narrative, because it's been well organized and censored.
The bashing of HCQ was started of by a fraud piece. The Lancet published that study which made all media go crazy, making all doctors using HCQ out for a quacks and losing/risking their license. Only a few weeks later Lancet retracted that peer reviewed paper of Surgisphere, because "HCQ quacks" looked at the actual data and realized it couldn't be proper and asked Lancet to audit it. i.e. so much for the mainstream "fact checkers".
Similar happened with Ivermectin. (my brother has a strong case for the efficacy of ivermectin with covid19. More on IVM at http://www.flccc.net )
They're making sure to crack down on any alternative, because otherwise the EUA/CMA license can't be approved for the covid19 gene therapy injections.
And if that's not all, quite a few instructions went against normal conduct, like;
But let's not mention the excess mortality going on in some countries, not since covid19, but since the jabs.. Media etc is silent for some reason. And in case heart/stroke mortality is reported, they're making people believe it's because of warmth🤦♂️
What worries me; The next wave the WHO has everything in place legal wise, and Dutch govt even signed(like many WHO affiliates) to follow WHO mandates(sidestepping our government) whenever WHO calls a self-proclaimed pandemic.. And without the mrna-jab(s) you increasingly will be excluded, there's multiple bodies steering in that direction.
Found these articles about suspended licenses because of prescribing IVM. Found them by using another search engine than Google. Only side-stream news is reporting on it, it seems..
i hope you find out that youtube is censoring, google is censoring, fact checkers only sit on specific topics for a specific outcome.
Cheers
Maybe i should have informed you that that is AU and not US?
It's interesting to me that the FDA, NIH and Medical board all play a role. But finding actual facts regarding doctors losing their license via Google turns out to nothing. While e.g. Scott Jensen has legal trouble, you can't find it in google. It only gives some suggestive articles; https://minnesotareformer.com/2022/07/14/scott-jensen-should-lose-his-minnesota-medical-license/
i don't claim "some shit about FDA"
And indeed EMA and FDA have the same narrative regarding the covid jabs. Have you even heard of CMA and EUA licenses? Your fact-checkers probably left that out of the equation.
If you were interested in the least, you would have been surprised that in EU, US and AU the same bashing and banning occurred. Did you even know youtube ghosted comments and deleting comments mentioning ivermectin? (While FDA didn't "prohibit" ivermectin?!).
I'm quite annoyed by you provided a nonsense fact check, having no answers to anything, and even calling the conspiracy flag. To me you're like the rest of the science deniers and fact check followers.
Fyi, if you use google for searching information which are 'fact check' category , then google switches to 'safe mode'. better use other search engine in that case
Except for the fact that EMA and FDA both follow exactly the same covid19 narrative
Depends who you listen to. I know multiple including my brother, whose outcome changed drastically within 4 days(after 10 days bed ridden) Have you seen http://flccc.net ?
i found a mainstream article, showing that there was indeed a ban (implying; Any doctor who would use it, had a problem) https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/may/05/ivermectin-ban-ended-by-australian-regulator-amid-warning-it-should-not-be-used-as-covid-treatment
The Dutch part i know from close by.
FDA(US), EMA(EU) do exactly the same regarding covid19 treatments. Where EUA-license was granted to the new injections by FDA, the EMA granted the CMA-license. EUA and CMA are essentially the same. Those licenses were only allowed if nothing else was a viable option. fyi; Many have speculated this being the reason for the crackdown on anything remotely effective( i.e. CQ, HCQ, IVM )
I guess the censorship and such tactics did wonders. (You really haven't noticed?) Looking at the downvotes, people really are ignorant of that fact🤔
Oh indeed! i added an url and an image, but the url was overwritten🙈 i updated the post.
e.g. in Netherlands; "IGJ" instituted the witch-hunt literally asking pharmacy to snitch on doctors. https://www.igj.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/03/25/boete-voor-artsen-die-hydroxychloroquine-of-ivermectine-voorschrijven-tegen-corona
Didn't you pick up on the horsepaste issue? And all the censorship on anyone mentioning ivermectin on youtube, facebook, linkedin etc?
Actually, in Netherlands customs, started to confiscate all ivermectin people took with them at the same time that IGJ started.
the "fact check" doesn't fit this video
The presenter describes statements done in court hearings, and points at the disingenuous statements by FDA.
So now that court has established that FDA didn't "prohibit" the use of ivermectin for treatment of covid19,
Please stop the downvote abuse! This is plain NEWS & education for the downvoters
Who has the original article for this?
First article i found, here
https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/the-future-of-urban-consumption-in-a-1-5c-world where you can download the ARUP report in PDF format. (PDF seems to be from 2020 https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://www.arup.com/-/media/arup/files/publications/c/arup-c40-the-future-of-urban-consumption-in-a-1-5c-world.pdf )
These guys wrote about it
https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/by-2030-you-will-not-eat-meat-will-only-be-allowed-to-buy-3-clothing-items-a-year-report-says
and these mentioned it again on August 20, 2023
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/14-u-s-cities-sign-wef-treaty-to-ban-meat-diary-private-cars-by-2030/
Christianity has many streams, all trying to do better than the other, in following the words of the Bible.
Scientology doesn't follow the Bible.
And then there are people who were far into dark spiritual practices(goes by many forms and names), like the host of that youtube channel, who found out that turning to the ressurrected Jesus Christ made their "spirit guides"(which Jesus points out as demonic spirits) tremble.