I wax nostalgic for the days when newsy-type articles didn't start with "so I saw this one thing by my house" with the intent to imply a larger impact.
Pure did the same to me. They'd rather lose lifetime subs and save the traffic than foster customer loyalty. They didn't expect any of us to pay for a recurring subscription after doing what they did.
This is most likely his villain origin story: He tried linux making him a hacker in his mind, broke it and couldn't fix it, the Arch forum told him to RTFM and pointed him to the wik so he reinstalled Windows and has made the entire linux community his arch nemesis.
Admitting some people aren't savvy enough to run linux is his kryptonite.
I definitely wouldn't have thought to label him terrible. Just emotionally delicate enough to not be able to handle dissenting opinions and harboring a sense of powerlessness that has made him want to create an environment where he gets to control the people that try to participate.
I can relate. I might start a "somethingsucks" community and may the Gods help anyone that tries to usurp me.
This one made me giggle. The linuxsucks dude is a trip. I would love to see a psychological workup on a person that creates a 1-person community on an ultra-niche platform and protects against other people joining to the death.
It's less than .05% of his worth. It's like us dropping pocket change in the Red Cross bucket and he'll make more than that in profit from changes the bribe paid for from the great cheetoh.
Celebrities, no. Pets, definitely.
It sounds like you finally learned about hexbear firsthand and don't have to rely on others' reports on their behavior.
I agree. This is schadenfreude, not uplifting.
This seems the wrong community for this. Probably would have fit better in one of the 4 billion us political groups.
Or wait the number of years it takes to be on sale for $20.
I wax nostalgic for the days when newsy-type articles didn't start with "so I saw this one thing by my house" with the intent to imply a larger impact.
And fuck teslers.
It's the internet. Everyone is an expert on everything.
Pure did the same to me. They'd rather lose lifetime subs and save the traffic than foster customer loyalty. They didn't expect any of us to pay for a recurring subscription after doing what they did.
It always gets passed to the customer. The billionaires don't lose money.
What a fragile ego to need your space daddy to dampen your partner's will and personality .
It's cool because we killed the tree.
It's not surprising. History is full of people making holidays for their God.
All hail our Lord and Savior, the great and omnipotent Cheetoh.
This is most likely his villain origin story: He tried linux making him a hacker in his mind, broke it and couldn't fix it, the Arch forum told him to RTFM and pointed him to the wik so he reinstalled Windows and has made the entire linux community his
archnemesis.Admitting some people aren't savvy enough to run linux is his kryptonite.
I know it shouldn't but your experience made me laugh. Not satire, indeed :)
I definitely wouldn't have thought to label him terrible. Just emotionally delicate enough to not be able to handle dissenting opinions and harboring a sense of powerlessness that has made him want to create an environment where he gets to control the people that try to participate.
I can relate. I might start a "somethingsucks" community and may the Gods help anyone that tries to usurp me.
This one made me giggle. The linuxsucks dude is a trip. I would love to see a psychological workup on a person that creates a 1-person community on an ultra-niche platform and protects against other people joining to the death.
It's less than .05% of his worth. It's like us dropping pocket change in the Red Cross bucket and he'll make more than that in profit from changes the bribe paid for from the great cheetoh.
What's the vehicle YMM?