Das isch doch kei Dräck, das isch hochstehendä, präzisä, schwiizer journalismus. Da muess mindestens "Reich", "Fuess" und "TikTok" drin stah, den lässed das au alli /s
Für das hätt sogar de Neo sich müese us de Matrix begäh. Es isch scho extrem wichtig, das die junge lüüt vo hüt wüssed, das mer kei lehr oder schuel muess machä - influenzer oder fuessmodel isch gnau so guet und den no lukrativer. /s
Good point, but i would still call it segregation, because to me it somehow is - even if it only was because of people who like the color blue, still segregation. Because you put these people in a "special" box where people who like the color red do not fit in.
I know what you mean, but maybe i am ignorant and completely wrong on this one but.. why do we need to segregate people from people? we're all humans. I know there are people that get discriminated for what they want to be or feel. But isn't it the wrong way to create something "especially for this group" because of this? Shouldn't we rather just normalize how we do things anyway?
What i don't understand is the mindset behind this. You're creating a special, separated section and will then seen as "special". But do people really want this? In my mind, it would be easier if everyone is treated and handled exactly the same - so no differences in ethnics, sexualities, color, etc.. Or am i wrong here?
As far as i know, such demos are organized in small circles and made public in personal chats and topic specific websites.
I heard about it on the radio and apparently most of these ftm surgeries were breast removals only.
Love the title, really a great name for our over-65 years old.
D News-Scouts wüsset halt scho was richtig intressant isch. Wart nur bis dä emal es wachtel-ei gseht.. Schocker
Läck Bobby, jetzt isch gnueg heu dune, bi dem ablick wird ja de frischischti emmetaler ranzig.
Das isch doch kei Dräck, das isch hochstehendä, präzisä, schwiizer journalismus. Da muess mindestens "Reich", "Fuess" und "TikTok" drin stah, den lässed das au alli /s
Für das hätt sogar de Neo sich müese us de Matrix begäh. Es isch scho extrem wichtig, das die junge lüüt vo hüt wüssed, das mer kei lehr oder schuel muess machä - influenzer oder fuessmodel isch gnau so guet und den no lukrativer. /s
Schwach, hett jetzt also scho e Platin-Duschi erwartet, smh /s
So they needed too much "resources" for their "destroy" process so they took it away from them.
Was? Die alte chläber muemer wegneh?
Wie hockt dä da? Wär stützt sini ärm ufem WC-Ring anstatt uf sine bei ab?
I totally agree and this is not because they really want to segregate them.
Good point, but i would still call it segregation, because to me it somehow is - even if it only was because of people who like the color blue, still segregation. Because you put these people in a "special" box where people who like the color red do not fit in.
Edit: Typo
I know what you mean, but maybe i am ignorant and completely wrong on this one but.. why do we need to segregate people from people? we're all humans. I know there are people that get discriminated for what they want to be or feel. But isn't it the wrong way to create something "especially for this group" because of this? Shouldn't we rather just normalize how we do things anyway?
What i don't understand is the mindset behind this. You're creating a special, separated section and will then seen as "special". But do people really want this? In my mind, it would be easier if everyone is treated and handled exactly the same - so no differences in ethnics, sexualities, color, etc.. Or am i wrong here?
It seems the "confiscate and destroy" part was not clear enough.. /s
Ab und zu mal eis an deckel - dänn gseht d wält wieder chli anderst us!
Less transparency was never the answer and never will be. If you're afraid being misrepresented, make your own footage and show them.
Also weniger transparenz? Nope
Ja voll in ordnig solang ich nöd muess mitlose. Aber fertig lustig isch den wennd 10ni gsi isch - den chasch gad abfahre..