As a data analyst, the way the two graphs are setup terribly. There's really not enough information to come up with any conclusions from the charts.
Also, first, there's not enough information from the graphs to determine the situation since it's only by percentages and not population. Second, our system is based on the winners of each state and used by the electoral votes. So overall popular vote isn't going to determine who got elected, even if the chart showed all blue for all demographics.
The problem is that if he does not scrap it, he knows his life will be in danger, if not just terrorized by MAGA supporters. I really hope he does not scrap it, as it will set up a new precedent for Trump crimes.
I don't think you understand American politics. If Democrats control 60% of the Senate, they still do not have the majority needed to pass laws. They need to control at least 67% of the Senate to pass laws. Otherwise Republicans can block their vote. That's why the Democrats could not convict Trump on impeachment even though they controlled more than 50% of the Senate at the time.
That's incorrect. There's a lot of obstruction from Republicans to allow Democrats to do anything since most decisions required 2/3rds vote to pass. Democrats could not convict Trump of impeachment with 57% of the vote since they needed more Republicans to push it over 2/3rds.
I'm pretty sure it's still very popular for a lot of Republicans considering that conservatives have only won the popular vote once in the last 35-ish years. The only time they won was George W. Bush's second term after the events of 9/11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
When I went to college early 2000's, my SSN was printed directly on my student ID card. It was the unique ID that the university used for each student. Then like a year or two later, they required all the students to get new IDs without the SSN printed on them.
I'm pretty sure it did. Usually these are exclusivity releases are negotiated with the platform companies. They'll still probably make an offer to Sony, but at a significantly higher price to compensate for lost sales during the first year. After the first year, it seems like it's allowed to go on other platforms.
I feel like disqualifying him would be more advantageous to the Republicans than the Democrats, since he would bite into voters that would lean conservative. What advantage would this be for the Democrats?
Bold of you to assume there will be another election.
Pretty sure Brian Driscoll is going to be terminated within a week after what he did.
Hmmm, not only a government-controlled TikTok, but a TRUMP/MUSK government-controlled TikTok. I see no red flags....
If it's free, then it's 100% a security risk. If it's from a reputable company like Nord VPN or Windscribe, you will be fine.
Abortion rights was always how it had been in my lifetime, but look at us now.
As a data analyst, the way the two graphs are setup terribly. There's really not enough information to come up with any conclusions from the charts.
Also, first, there's not enough information from the graphs to determine the situation since it's only by percentages and not population. Second, our system is based on the winners of each state and used by the electoral votes. So overall popular vote isn't going to determine who got elected, even if the chart showed all blue for all demographics.
Yup. It was used to transfer photos from a camera to a phone back in the day when cameras didn't have wireless transfer features.
I'm surprised he hasn't nominated Putin for a cabinet role.
The problem is that if he does not scrap it, he knows his life will be in danger, if not just terrorized by MAGA supporters. I really hope he does not scrap it, as it will set up a new precedent for Trump crimes.
Thanks for the corrections!
I don't think you understand American politics. If Democrats control 60% of the Senate, they still do not have the majority needed to pass laws. They need to control at least 67% of the Senate to pass laws. Otherwise Republicans can block their vote. That's why the Democrats could not convict Trump on impeachment even though they controlled more than 50% of the Senate at the time.
That's incorrect. There's a lot of obstruction from Republicans to allow Democrats to do anything since most decisions required 2/3rds vote to pass. Democrats could not convict Trump of impeachment with 57% of the vote since they needed more Republicans to push it over 2/3rds.
Tasker. Pretty much programming your Android to automate things. Such a powerful app.
So he sued her friends, why didn't he try using the ex-wife that actually had the abortion? Sounds like a real piece of shit guy.
I'm pretty sure it's still very popular for a lot of Republicans considering that conservatives have only won the popular vote once in the last 35-ish years. The only time they won was George W. Bush's second term after the events of 9/11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
When I went to college early 2000's, my SSN was printed directly on my student ID card. It was the unique ID that the university used for each student. Then like a year or two later, they required all the students to get new IDs without the SSN printed on them.
There used to be an S-Mart in southern California too, but it closed down. It was a Korean supermarket similar to H-mart.
I'm pretty sure it did. Usually these are exclusivity releases are negotiated with the platform companies. They'll still probably make an offer to Sony, but at a significantly higher price to compensate for lost sales during the first year. After the first year, it seems like it's allowed to go on other platforms.
This is definitely what SE wants, but that's going to depend on how much Sony is willing to pay for 1 year of exclusivity in the future.
I feel like disqualifying him would be more advantageous to the Republicans than the Democrats, since he would bite into voters that would lean conservative. What advantage would this be for the Democrats?