Seriously, this is such a self-own. If you find something they're saying thoughtful, say what that thing is, don't just tweet out "Hey, I don't agree with these people, but y'all should listen to them anyway."
President Javier Milei slashed inflation and spending, but it wasn’t enough to stave off an economic crisis. President Trump has offered him a lifeline.
I don't have a NYT sub.
This credulous nonsense of a subheader reminded me why.
Has someone explained to them that sometimes sacrifices have to be made in order to stop that trans girl in Minnesota from playing volleyball? They just need to see the bigger picture.
A brain surgeon makes money by working on brains and therefore is in the working class; the person that owns the hospital makes money by extracting rents from the brain surgeon and therefore is in the capitalist class.
Upper class and middle class don't necessarily correspond directly with those terms.
The GOP’s self-styled image as the party of “law and order” has purchase insofar as it contrasts with the Democrats who turned a blind eye to crimes committed by the right people...
Yeah, "capitalism" is when a the private equity firm buys the farm and now instead of producing enough to live on, or even just "as much as they did last year, now they must show year over year profits.. Every year.. Forever
Cambridge Dictionary:
"Net neutrality is the idea that Internet providers must treat all content equally."
Brittanica:
"net neutrality, principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) should not discriminate among providers of content."
"Traffic congestion" is the reasoning ISPs use to defend subverting net neutrality, but it still results in certain viewpoints being favored over others. If Spectrum decides to throttle Fox News and not CNN, it doesn't matter if their reasoning is that Fox News uses more bandwidth, the result is still that the viewpoint that Fox espouses is throttled while that of CNN is not. Sure it's conjecture that is or will happen, but it is the case that the doctrine of net neutrality is what is standing in opposition to it.
It's the right to bear arms. So it's illegal to carry just one gun at a time.
I hear in communist countries 3 dollars only gets you a piece of chicken, a piece of broccoli, a corn tortilla, and one other thing. Sounds bleak.
Seriously, this is such a self-own. If you find something they're saying thoughtful, say what that thing is, don't just tweet out "Hey, I don't agree with these people, but y'all should listen to them anyway."
Yep! I for one will be carrying a sign promoting www.generalstrikeus.com as the next big step we can take as a people against the ruling class.
I don't have a NYT sub. This credulous nonsense of a subheader reminded me why.
Why are these people so desperate to find some external factor for autism?
It's lucky there weren't any T-bones.
Relevant bit from Airplane!
Absolutely. They fully intend for the next hurricane floodwall to come and sweep away these people.
Has someone explained to them that sometimes sacrifices have to be made in order to stop that trans girl in Minnesota from playing volleyball? They just need to see the bigger picture.
A brain surgeon makes money by working on brains and therefore is in the working class; the person that owns the hospital makes money by extracting rents from the brain surgeon and therefore is in the capitalist class.
Upper class and middle class don't necessarily correspond directly with those terms.
And that's enough fiction for today.
Yeah, "capitalism" is when a the private equity firm buys the farm and now instead of producing enough to live on, or even just "as much as they did last year, now they must show year over year profits.. Every year.. Forever
Here's some of those clear definitions
Cambridge Dictionary: "Net neutrality is the idea that Internet providers must treat all content equally."
Brittanica: "net neutrality, principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) should not discriminate among providers of content."
"Traffic congestion" is the reasoning ISPs use to defend subverting net neutrality, but it still results in certain viewpoints being favored over others. If Spectrum decides to throttle Fox News and not CNN, it doesn't matter if their reasoning is that Fox News uses more bandwidth, the result is still that the viewpoint that Fox espouses is throttled while that of CNN is not. Sure it's conjecture that is or will happen, but it is the case that the doctrine of net neutrality is what is standing in opposition to it.
Replace "Netflix" and "Max" with "Substack" and 'Washington Post" and what you wrote absolutely applies to viewpoint.
RFCs are Requests For Comment, published technical documents describing proposed standards.
Two or three fingers?
Yep. I said it then and it's only become more true that Jan 6th was Trump's Beer Hall Putsch and we're set to repeat history.
Thanks for providing the link
I agree that Politico is a rag, but this sounds made up.