I'm not sure about the data sources for this image but from some quick research it looks like this includes scope 3 (end user emissions) for shell and chevron by not the others. The data realistically looks a bit more like this:
πΈπ¦ Saudi Aramco: ~2.0 Billion metric tons (Estimated; excludes Scope 3 from official tracking)
π¬π§ Shell: ~1.1 Billion metric tons
πΊπΈ ExxonMobil: ~813 Million metric tons
πΊπΈ Chevron: ~600 to 780 Million metric tons (Varies by accounting method)
π¬π§ BP: ~400 Million metric tons
Context: For all these companies, Scope 3 makes up 85% to 95% of their total climate impact. This is why state-owned giants like Aramco and US majors like Exxon/Chevron focus their climate targets almost entirely on their own drilling operations (Scope 1 & 2) while excluding the footprint of the products they sell.
In any case this is pretty bad and we are probably gonners.
I'm not sure about the data sources for this image but from some quick research it looks like this includes scope 3 (end user emissions) for shell and chevron by not the others. The data realistically looks a bit more like this:
πΈπ¦ Saudi Aramco: ~2.0 Billion metric tons (Estimated; excludes Scope 3 from official tracking) π¬π§ Shell: ~1.1 Billion metric tons πΊπΈ ExxonMobil: ~813 Million metric tons πΊπΈ Chevron: ~600 to 780 Million metric tons (Varies by accounting method) π¬π§ BP: ~400 Million metric tons
Context: For all these companies, Scope 3 makes up 85% to 95% of their total climate impact. This is why state-owned giants like Aramco and US majors like Exxon/Chevron focus their climate targets almost entirely on their own drilling operations (Scope 1 & 2) while excluding the footprint of the products they sell.
In any case this is pretty bad and we are probably gonners.
"These walls contain the world's knowledge"
I legit thought you were saying that there are hotels with paywall mirrors in their bathrooms π€¦
I do enjoy how chill it can be at times on grand final day π