Subd. 3. Exemption. The prohibitions in subdivision 2 do not apply when the website, application, software, program, or other service requires the technical skill of a user to nudify an image or video.
I get the idea, but this doesn't comfort me, because what is "technical skill" here? That seems subjective and will ultimately be up to a court to decide. What constitutes a skill? It's prompting a skill? Is prompting Photoshop's AI a skill? Their lasso tool is pretty easy to use. The line isn't clear, and a clever lawyer, or a judge, or a jury could come down differently on what counts and what doesn't.
I get the goal here. But I think we were already covered by the existing law that made distribution of these artificial nudes illegal.
Creating and distributing AI nudes of people was already illegal in Minnesota. This is a separate law that makes hosting or providing any service or "software" that has the ability to do that illegal. It is broadly worded and makes more than the intended target illegal, which was already illegal to begin with.
Those were already illegal in Minnesota. This is a law that goes further and bans services or "software" that has the ability to remove clothing from images of people.
This is all so easily avoidable if they would spend a little more money to make them quieter, water efficient, and pay for their own energy. The technology exists. We could engineer a solution.
But I guess it's cheaper to bribe a few councilmen.
Not smooth, just that the PATRIOTS showed out in such numbers that Xi couldn't print enough ballots to overcome them. Factories cranking out millions of fake DEMONRAT ballots were beaten by the hard working PATRIOTS showing up in numbers never seen before! Some say the biggest numbers.
My only comment is that I like this.
They would never. Surely.
That's not a very... European sounding last name. He must not be aware that he is not immune from the hate machine.
I could, if forced, allow 72, or 128. That's the best I can do.
Speed limits should be in powers of 2, e.g. 16, 32, and 64. That's all we need.
Unfortunately a lot of democrats share these shitty views on "others" like transgender people, gay people, etc.
Double humiliating.
How humiliating it must be to work for this man.
Things can be both funny and extraordinary cruel. That's just the human condition.
I get the idea, but this doesn't comfort me, because what is "technical skill" here? That seems subjective and will ultimately be up to a court to decide. What constitutes a skill? It's prompting a skill? Is prompting Photoshop's AI a skill? Their lasso tool is pretty easy to use. The line isn't clear, and a clever lawyer, or a judge, or a jury could come down differently on what counts and what doesn't.
I get the goal here. But I think we were already covered by the existing law that made distribution of these artificial nudes illegal.
Creating and distributing AI nudes of people was already illegal in Minnesota. This is a separate law that makes hosting or providing any service or "software" that has the ability to do that illegal. It is broadly worded and makes more than the intended target illegal, which was already illegal to begin with.
Those were already illegal in Minnesota. This is a law that goes further and bans services or "software" that has the ability to remove clothing from images of people.
ok
As soon as we fix all the problems that stem from it, we can shut up about it. Until then... 🤷
So many people seem to have missed that this is the shitpost magazine.
This is all so easily avoidable if they would spend a little more money to make them quieter, water efficient, and pay for their own energy. The technology exists. We could engineer a solution.
But I guess it's cheaper to bribe a few councilmen.
The list, if anyone was curious:
Not smooth, just that the PATRIOTS showed out in such numbers that Xi couldn't print enough ballots to overcome them. Factories cranking out millions of fake DEMONRAT ballots were beaten by the hard working PATRIOTS showing up in numbers never seen before! Some say the biggest numbers.
programmin'