Does the result of the experiment change if there's a sensor active that records data to a hard drive that no one ever looks at and it just gets deleted
Yes. It collapses the wave function. There is no need for something 'conscious' to count as an 'observer'.
Your second question is moot, because the first part counted as an observation.
I've been a professional developer for over a decade.
Find something simple to solve a problem you actually have.
Who cares if its been done better a thousand times. Thats not the point.
The point is that the only way you get better is by doing it shittly first, and then learn from mistakes. After a while you make less.
Black jack inna terminal is a good one, a to do app, or time tracker, or automated stop watch. Whatever.
Even better if you find one that's been done before. Do it yourself, then compare with what someone else did. What you like and dislike about how they did it, and keep learning.
So you are saying the us shouldn't have launched the campaign? Because that sounds exactly like how your responding as well. They're all terrorists, look at what you made me do......
What about the american terrorism? Glossing over that?
What I'm pointing out here,
Is that Americans and Israels have been the terrorist for decades in that region. Assisinating generals they feel like, bombing schools, developing nukes, the list goes on so much more than Iran and its proxies. So o don't understand how you can primailry denounce the little guy, at the expense of the angry shark in the room.
Because there likely wouldn't be as much terrorism, if not for the decades of antagonist behaviours.
There are plenty of crazies who have their PhD in some branch of physics/math. One of the reasons I stopped at a bachelor's in physics.
Its almost a prerequisite. But from what I've read of him in the past, he's pretty far out there.
Plausible!
I had a bachelor's in physics a decade ago.
But here's how my memory describes how we discovered, or at least how we did it in my computational physics class.
You have stars of known size, and there for light output as its directly proportional to size. You also have a known distance.
You can then calculate how bright the star should be. But its wrong.
Meaning there's things in the way thats blocking light.
So we call it dark matter because it hasn't been directly observed and its clearly there. It could be our fundamentals are wrong, but that's unlikely.
It could very well follow gravitational fields, and then attracted to galaxies with large masses.
But it could also be something in the vacuum. We just have no evidence to suggest either way.
Autistic people who have trouble telling jokes exist.
Yes. It collapses the wave function. There is no need for something 'conscious' to count as an 'observer'.
Your second question is moot, because the first part counted as an observation.
The last few comments are talking about hating Jews, not isralies.
I've been a professional developer for over a decade.
Find something simple to solve a problem you actually have.
Who cares if its been done better a thousand times. Thats not the point.
The point is that the only way you get better is by doing it shittly first, and then learn from mistakes. After a while you make less.
Black jack inna terminal is a good one, a to do app, or time tracker, or automated stop watch. Whatever.
Even better if you find one that's been done before. Do it yourself, then compare with what someone else did. What you like and dislike about how they did it, and keep learning.
That's missing the point of maybe we don't need to travel indiscriminately?
Your now making the claim those are similar, so post your figures.
Because you really believe the carbon footprint of a tube of paint and its shipping is comparable to a gas turbine generator running 24/7, and the Google data centre using 2 million gallons per day.
Okay buddy.
Edit:
When was the last time tubes of paint Made someone's home electrical rates rise
S again, you think it was just the picture, not just who made it.
So that means they must be right?
Do you actually think your convincing anyone with a meme, AI or not?
You say that like the greatest terrorist organisation isnt the US military.
What I'm pushing agaisnt is who your letting define twrrosit, because to most west asia (and even east Asia), the terorista are the US military.
So you are saying the us shouldn't have launched the campaign? Because that sounds exactly like how your responding as well. They're all terrorists, look at what you made me do......
What makes Iran terorists and the us not one?
What about the american terrorism? Glossing over that?
What I'm pointing out here,
Is that Americans and Israels have been the terrorist for decades in that region. Assisinating generals they feel like, bombing schools, developing nukes, the list goes on so much more than Iran and its proxies. So o don't understand how you can primailry denounce the little guy, at the expense of the angry shark in the room.
Because there likely wouldn't be as much terrorism, if not for the decades of antagonist behaviours.
I can be mad at both, and still believe Iran is in the right to defend itself from American and Israeli imperialism first.
As have yours by the way.